Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Invaginations by Multiple-Slice Computed Tomography in Adults

Erişkinlerde İnvajinasyonların Çok Kesitli Bilgisayarlı Tomografi İle Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
322–326
Publication Date
2020-08-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When all patients in our study were evaluated, a malignant pathology was observed in 10 patients (23%) and a benign pathology was observed in 20 patients (45%).No etiologic factor was found in 14 patients (32%) and they were accepted as idiopathic.When the length of the invaded segment was evaluated, it was found to be 5 cm (2-20 cm) in colon invagination, 3,6 cm (1-13 cm) in the small bowel segments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to present the computed tomography (CT) imaging features and etiologic causes of invagination, which is one of the causes of abdominal pain in adults, and to emphasize the recognition of invagination.Materials and Methods: In our study, images of patients who were admitted to our clinic for abdominal pain between January 2010 and July 2019 and diagnosed with invagination in intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal CT were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated the age and sex, level of invagination, length of invaded segment, causes of invagination.Results: In our study, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT of 44 patients (23 (52%) male and 21 (48%) female) were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When all patients in our study were evaluated, a malignant pathology was observed in 10 patients (23%) and a benign pathology was observed in 20 patients (45%).No etiologic factor was found in 14 patients (32%) and they were accepted as idiopathic.When the length of the invaded segment was evaluated, it was found to be 5 cm (2-20 cm) in colon invagination, 3,6 cm (1-13 cm) in the small bowel segments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Erişkin · İnvajinasyon · Bilgisayarlı tomografi

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to present the computed tomography (CT) imaging features and etiologic causes of invagination, which is one of the causes of abdominal pain in adults, and to emphasize the recognition of invagination.Materials and Methods: In our study, images of patients who were admitted to our clinic for abdominal pain between January 2010 and July 2019 and diagnosed with invagination in intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal CT were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the age and sex, level of invagination, length of invaded segment, causes of invagination.Results: In our study, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT of 44 patients (23 (52%) male and 21 (48%) female) were examined. The mean age of the patients was 39.1 (18-78). Eight (18%) patients had colon invagination, 35 patients (79%) had small bowel and 1 patient (2%) had ileocolic invagination.Malignancy was the most common cause of colon invagination (62.5%) and benign pathology was the most common cause of intestinal invagination (48.5%). When all patients in our study were evaluated, a malignant pathology was observed in 10 patients (23%) and a benign pathology was observed in 20 patients (45%).No etiologic factor was found in 14 patients (32%) and they were accepted as idiopathic.When the length of the invaded segment was evaluated, it was found to be 5 cm (2-20 cm) in colon invagination, 3,6 cm (1-13 cm) in the small bowel segments. The relatively long segment was affected in the colon loops.Conclusion: In our study, 18% of invaginations were located in colon and 79% of small intestine. Sixty eight percent of total cases had malignant or benign pathology. Computed tomography shortens the diagnosis of invaginations, a cause of abdominal pain in adults, and can determine the etiologic cause to a large extent.Key words: Adult, Invagination, Computed Tomography, Malignancy

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı erişkinlerde karın ağrısı sebeplerinden biri olan invajinasyon olgularının bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) görüntüleme özelliklerini ve etyolojik nedenlerini sunmak ve böylece invajinasyonun tanınabilirliğini vurgulamaktır.Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmamızda Ocak 2010-Temmuz 2019 tarihleri arasında kliniğimize karın ağrısı nedeniyle başvurmuş ve intravenöz kontrastlı batın BT’de invajinasyon tanısı almış hastaların görüntüleri retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Hastalar; yaş ve cinsiyet, invajinasyon düzeyi, invaje segment uzunluğu, invajinasyon sebepleri açısından değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Çalışmamızda 23 (%52) ü erkek, 21 (%48) i kadın olmak üzere toplam 44 hastanın kontrastlı batın BT si incelendi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 39,1 (18-78) yıl idi. İnvajinasyon 8 (%18) hastada kolon; 35 (%79) hastada ince bağırsak, 1 hastada (%2) ileokolik yerleşimliydi. Kolon invajinasyonlarında en sık neden (%62,5) malignite, ince bağırsak invajinasyonlarında en sık neden (%48,5) benign bir patoloji idi. Çalışmamızdaki bütün hastalar değerlendirildiğinde 10 hastada (%23) malign bir patoloji, 20 hastada (%45) benign bir patoloji izlenmiş olup 14 hastada (%32) etyolojik faktör bulunamamış ve idiyopatik olarak kabul edilmiştir.İnvaje segment uzunluğuna bakıldığında kolon anslarında ortalama 5 (2-20 cm) cm; ince bağırsak segmentlerinde ortalama 3,6 cm (1-13 cm) idi. Kolon anslarında nispeten daha uzun segment etkilenmişti.Sonuç: Çalışmamızda invajinasyonların %18 i kolon, %79 u ince bağırsak yerleşimliydi. Toplam %68 olguda etyolojide malign veya benign bir patoloji mevcuttu. Bilgisayarlı tomografi erişkinlerde karın ağrısının bir sebebi olan invajinasyonların tanısını kolaylaştırmakta ve etyolojik nedeni büyük oranda saptayabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZ, M. A., DENİZ, Z. T. (2020). Evaluation of Invaginations by Multiple-Slice Computed Tomography in Adults. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 322–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/99048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Federle M. P. Jeffrey R. B., Woodward P. J. Diagnostic Imaging Abdomen İkinci baskı,2013
  2. II-5-56-57 2. Haas EM, Etter EL, Ellis S, Taylor TV. Adult intussusception. Am J Surg 2003
  3. Gordon RS, O’Dell KB, Namon AJ, Becker LB. Intussusception in the adult-a rare disease. J Emerg Med 1991
  4. Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997
  5. 138 5. Chiang JM, Lin YS. Tumor spectrum of adult intussusception. J Surg Oncol 2008
  6. 98(6): 444-7. 6. Rea JD, Lockhart ME, Yarbrough DE, Leeth RR, Bledsoe SE, Clements RH. Approach to management of intussusception in adults: a new paradigm in the computed tomography era. Am Surg 2007
  7. 73(11): 1098-105. 7. Omori H, Asahi H, Inoue Y, Irinoda T, Takahashi M, Saito K. Intussusception in adults: a 21-year experience in the university-affiliated emergency center and indication for nonoperative reduction. Dig Surg 2003
  8. 20(5): 433-9. 8. M. P. Guillén-Paredes, A. Campillo-Soto, J. G. Martín-Lorenzo, J. A. Torralba-Martinez, M. Mengual-Ballester, M. J. Cases-Baldó and J. L. Aguayo-Albasini. Adult intussusception - 14 case reports and their outcomes. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2010
  9. 102 (1): 32-40 9. Begos DG, Sander A, Modlin IM. The diagnosis and mangement of adult intussusception. Am J Surg 1997
  10. 88–94 10. Weilbaecher D, Bolin JA, Hearn D, Ogden W. Intsussusseption in adults. Am J Surg1971
  11. 531–5 11. Savas Yakan, Cemil Calıskan, Ozer Makay, Ali Galip Deneclı, Mustafa Ali Korkut Intussusception in adults: Clinical characteristics, diagnosis and operative strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2009 April 28
  12. 15(16): 1985-1989 12. Barussaud M, Regenet N, Briennon X ve ark. Clinical spectrum and surgical approach of adult intussusceptions: a multicentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006
  13. 834–9. 13. Erkan N, Haciyanli M, Yildirim M, Sayhan H, Vardar E, Polat AF. Intussusception in adults: an unusual and challenging condition for surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005
  14. 452–6. 14. Wang N, Cui XY, Liu Y, Long J, Xu YH, Guo RX, et al. Adult intussusception: a retrospective review of 41 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2009
  15. 15(26):3303-8. 15. Ali Harlak, Gürkan Öztürk, Özcan Altınel, Öner Mentes, Tahir Özer, Sezai Demirbas, Nail Ersöz, Kagan Coskun, Taner Yigit. Eriskinlerde Görülen Intestinal Invajinasyonların Klinik Seyri. The Eurasian Journal of Medicine EAJM: 39, Nisan 2007 37-40 16. Prater JM, Olshemski FC. Adult intussusception. Am Fam Physician 1993
  16. Abbas Aras, Cevher Akarsu, M