Journals / Forestist / 2017 / Cilt: 67 Sayı: 2

Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey

Kaya yuvarlanmalarından etkilenen orman alanlarının belirlenmesi: İnebolu örneği

Journal
Forestist
Pages
136–149
Publication Date
2017-04-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Enerhi hattı açısı · koruma ormanı · kaya yuvarlanması

Abstract

Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey

Özet

Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, A., EKER, R. (2017). Forest mapping against rockfalls on a regional scale in Inebolu-Turkey. Forestist, Cilt: 67 Sayı: 2, 136–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/990316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Albisetti, A.D.K., Brang, P., Schönenberger, W., Bugmann, H., 2003. Decay of Picea abies snag stands on steep mountain slopes. The Forestry Chronicle 79: 247-252.
  2. Aydın, A., Köse, N., Akkemik, Ü., Yurtseven, H., 2012. Assessment and analysis of rockfall-caused tree injuries in a Turkish fir stand: A case study from Kastamonu-Turkey. Journal of Mountain Science 9:137-146.
  3. Bebi, P., Kienast, F., Schönenberger, W., 2001. Assessing structures in mountain forests as a basis for investigating the forests’ dynamics and protective function. Forest Ecology and Management 145: 3-14.
  4. Berger, F., Quetel, C., Dorren, L.K.A., 2002. Forest: a natural protection means against rockfalls, but with which efficiency? In: Proceedings of the International Congress Interpraevent 2002, Proceedings book Vol 2:815-826,
  5. Pacific Rim-Matsumoto, Japan. Berger, F., Rey, F., 2004. Mountain protection forests against natural hazards and risks: new French developments by integrating forests in risk zoning. Natural Hazards 33: 395-404.
  6. Berger, F., Dorren, L.K.A., 2007. Principles of the tool Rockfor.net for quantifying the rockfall hazard below a protection forest. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen 6:157-165.
  7. Berger, F., Clouet, N., Toe, D., 2012. Avalanches and rockfall regional analysis with a special focus on protective role of forest. In: Tacnet, JM, editor. Decision support guidelines methods, procedures and tools developed in PARAmount (WP 7). IRSTEA, UR ETGR (Snow Avalanches Engineering and Torrent Control Research Unit), 2 Rue de la Papeterie BP 76, 38402 Saint Martin d’Hères, France. Berger, F., Dorren, L., Kleemayr, K., Maier, B., Planinsek, S., Bigot, C., Bourrier, F., Jancke, O., Toe, D., Cerbu, G., 2013. Eco-Engineering and Protection Forests against Rockfalls and Snow Avalanches. In: Cerbu G, editor. Management Strategies to Adapt Alpine Space Forests to Climate Change Risks. ISBN: 978-953-51-1194-8,
  8. InTech, DOI: 10.5772/56275. Bigot, C., Dorren, L.K.A., Berger, F., 2009. Quantifying the protective function of a forest against rockfall for past, present and future scenarios using two modelling approaches. Natural Hazards 49: 99-111.
  9. Brang, P., 2001. Resistance and elasticity: promising concepts for the management of protection forests in the European Alps. Forest Ecology and Management 145: 107-119.
  10. Brang, P., Schönenberger, W., Ott, E., Gardner, B., 2001. Forests as protection from natural hazards. In: Evans J, editor. The forests handbook, Vol. 2: Applying forest sci