However, the fact that Turkey has been exposed to internal and external political developments in the last decade negatively affected the amount of financial resources coming to Turkey through foreign direct investment.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, foreign direct investment is one of the most important tools that allow countries to make progress in the economic development processes and to integrate with the world economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that Turkey was declared to be a candidate country to the EU in 2005 encouraged foreign direct investments to tend towards Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the fact that Turkey has been exposed to internal and external political developments in the last decade negatively affected the amount of financial resources coming to Turkey through foreign direct investment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Foreign Direct Investment · Place of InvestmentPreference · Turkish Economy
Abstract
Today, foreign direct investment is one of the most important tools that allow countries to make progress in the economic development processes and to integrate with the world economy. Countries that can correctly construe the advantages offered by the globalization process are looking for a way to make their national markets attractive for foreign investors. Turkey is also one of the countries that make efforts in this regard. The fact that Turkey was declared to be a candidate country to the EU in 2005 encouraged foreign direct investments to tend towards Turkey. However, the fact that Turkey has been exposed to internal and external political developments in the last decade negatively affected the amount of financial resources coming to Turkey through foreign direct investment.
Gullu, I., Kılıc, N. O. (2017). An Evaluation on the Attractiveness of Turkish Economy in Terms of Foreign Direct Investments. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 70–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/988012
. Cahit Aydemir, Arslan İbrahim ve Uncu Funda, “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Gelişimi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 23, 2012, 69-104.
. Nuri, Yavan, Hamdi, Kara, 2003, “Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Bölgesel Dağılışı”, Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:1, Sayı: 1, ss:19-42.
.H. Seyidoğlu, Uluslararası Finans, Geliştirilmiş 4.Baskı, Güzem Can yayınları, İstanbul, 2003.
. R. Karluk, Türkiye’de Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları, İstanbul, İ.T.O., Ekonomik Yayınlar Dizisi, No. 13, 1983, s. 70, 85, 101.
. IMF. Manuel de la balance des paiements et de la position extérieure globale, sixiemedition, Washington DC, USA, 2009,1-372.
. OECD. « Performancesdesfilialesétrangères dans lespays de l’OCDE », Paris 1994, p15.
. OECD. Définition de référence de l’OCDE des Investissements Directs Internationaux, 2008.
. Resmi Gazete, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Kanunu, Kanun No: 4875, Erişim Tarihi: 17 Haziran 2003.
. H. Seyidoğlu, Uluslararası Finans, Geliştirilmiş 4.Baskı, Güzem Can yayınları, İstanbul, 2003.
. Muhsin Kar ve Kara M., “Türkiye’ye Yönelik Sermaye Hareketleri ve Krizler”, Dış Ticaret Dergisi, Temmuz, Yıl:8, Sayı:29, 2003, 46-80
. Cahit Aydemir, Arslan İbrahim ve Uncu Funda, “Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki Gelişimi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 23, 2012, 69-104.
.World Bank WDI, 2016.
. World Investment Report, UNCTAD, 2009.
. World Investment Report, UNCTAD, 2014.
. Açıkalın Sezgin, Ünal Seyfettin, 2008, “Doğrudan Yatırımlar ve Portföy Yatırımları, Global ve Yerel Faktörlerin Türkiye Üzerindeki Göreceli Etkisi”, Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım.
. M. Emin, Erçakar ve Erdal, Tanas, Karagöl, 2011, “Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar”, SETA Analiz, s.9.
. Harun, Bal ve Göz, Devlet, “Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Ve Türkiye”, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 19, Sayı 2, 2010, Sayfa 450 – 467.
.World Bank WDI, 2016
.T.C. Ekonomi Bakanlığı, Uluslararası Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar 2013 Yılı Raporu, Aralık 2014.
. OECD «L'investissementdirectétrangerau service dudéveloppement. Optimiserlesavantages, minimiserlescoûts", Paris, 2002, p:60.
. Baud P.,Bourgeat S., et Bras C., Dictionnaire de géographie, Hatier, Collectioninitial, 544p, 2003, pp. 137-138.
. DiMéo G., « Quevoulons-nous dire quandnousparlonsd’espace ? », in Lévy J., etLussault M., (sous la direction de), Logiques de l’espace, espritdeslieuxgéographies àCerisy, Paris, Edition Belin, 2000, pp. 37-48.
. Camagni R., « Compétitivitéterritoriale, milieuxlocaux et apprentissagecollectif:unecontre- réflexioncritique», Revued’EconomieRégionale et Urbaine, N°4, 2002, pp 553-578.
. BenoîtCoeuré et IsabelleRabaud, Attractivité de la France:analyse, perception et mesure, Économie et Statistique, 2003, N° 363-364-365.
. Banque de France Bulletin de la Banque de France, N 123, 2004, Mars 1-39.
. Muchielli, J-L., « De nouvellesformes de multinationalisation: lesalliancesstratégiques », Problèmeséconomiques, n°. 2234, 1991, pp 25-32, Juillet.