SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of General Medicine / 2011 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy

Mustafa KOPLAY
Elif AKSAKALLİ
Serdar TOKER
Seda OZBEK
Ali Sami KİVRAK
Pages
31–35
Publication Date
2011-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Özet

-

🔖

Cite This Article

KOPLAY, M., AKSAKALLİ, E., TOKER, S., OZBEK, S., KİVRAK, A. S. (2011). Diagnostic accuracy of 0.2 Tesla open MRI unit in detecting meniscal tears: Correlation with arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 31–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/987732

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a com- parative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
  2. Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field ver- sus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
  3. Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
  4. Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of menis- cal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
  5. Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 pa- tients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80. Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
  6. Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic reso- nance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
  7. Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the dif- ferentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
  8. Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, et al. Diagnostic per- formance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1155-60.
  9. Kladny B, Glückert K, Swoboda B, Beyer W, Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:281-6.
  10. Cotten A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1093-7
  11. Krampla W, Roesel M, Svoboda K, Nachbagauer A, Gschwantler M, Hruby W. MRI of the knee: how do field strength and radiologist's experience influence diagnostic accuracy and interobserver correlation in assessing chon- dral and meniscal lesions and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1519-28.