Journals / ENT Updates / 2012 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Comparison of the effectiveness of two different combinations of oral ketamine and midazolam premedication in autistic children

Otistik çocuklarda iki farklı oral ketamin+midazolam premedikasyonunun etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
100–105
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our results showed that both dose regimens provided successful premedication in autistic children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Effective premedication is one of the key factors for anesthetic management of autistic children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study in 142 autistic children, aged 1-17 years, undergoing brain SPECT imaging procedure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our results showed that both dose regimens provided successful premedication in autistic children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Oral · premedikasyon · midazolam

Abstract

Objective: Effective premedication is one of the key factors for anesthetic management of autistic children. We designed a study protocol to compare two different dose regimens of midazolam plus ketamine for premedication of autistic children. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study in 142 autistic children, aged 1-17 years, undergoing brain SPECT imaging procedure. Group I received oral 0.5 mg/kg midazolam with 3 mg/kg ketamine and Group II received oral midazolam 0.25 mg/kg with ketamine 6 mg/kg. Onset of sedation and sedation score just before the induction of anesthesia were recorded. Anxiety of children was assessed by a four point scale at admittance, during separation from parents and at venipuncture. Post-anesthetic recovery was assessed using the modified Aldrete score. Postoperative vomiting and any other side effects were recorded when seen. Ten days after the procedure, parents were interviewed for changes in behaviors, sleep disturbances and feeding difficulties. Results: Acceptable sedation scores were obtained in both groups. Success rates for parental separation and intravenous cannulation were higher than 85% in both groups. There were no differences between two groups in terms of sedation onset time, intravenous cannulation anxiety score, parental separation anxiety score, side effects and changes in behaviors, sleep disturbances and feeding difficulties. The only significant difference between two groups is sedation scores before induction of anesthesia. Children in high ketamine group had deeper sedation state than those in the other group. Conclusion: Our results showed that both dose regimens provided successful premedication in autistic children.

Özet

Amaç: Otistik çocukların anestezi yönetiminde etkin bir premedikasyon hayati önem taşır. Çalışmamızda otistik çocuklarda premedikasyon amacıyla kullanılan iki farklı midazolam+ketamin kombinasyonunun etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Prospektif, randomize ve çift-kör olan bu çalışmaya beyin SPECT görüntüleme yöntemi uygulanabilecek yaşları 1-17 arasında 142 otistik çocuk dâhil edilmiştir. 1. gruba 0.5 mg/kg midazolam + 3 mg/kg ketamin, 2. gruba ise 0.25 mg/kg midazolam + 6 mg/kg ketamin oral yoldan verilmiştir. Sedasyon başlama süresi ve anestezi indüksiyonu öncesi sedasyon skoru kayıt edilmiştir. Çocuklarda başlangıçta, aileden ayrılırken ve damar yolu açılırken anksiyete dörtlü bir skala ile, anestezi sonrası derlenme ise modifiye Aldrete skoru ile değerlendirilmiştir. Postoperatif dönemde bulantı ve benzeri yan etkiler kayıt edilmiştir. İşlemden 10 gün sonra hasta yakınları aranmış ve davranış değişiklikleri, uyku bozuklukları ve beslenme sorunları açısından sorgulanmıştır. Bulgular: Her iki grupta da kabul edilebilir sedasyon skorları elde edilmiş, aileden ayrılma ve intravenöz kanülasyonda %85'in üstünde başarı elde edilmiştir. Sedasyon başlangıç süresi, aileden ayrılma, intravenöz kanülasyonda anksiyete skorları, yan etkiler, postoperatif davranış değişiklikleri ve beslenme sorunları açısından iki grup arasında bir fark bulunmamıştır. Gruplar arasında tek anlamlı fark, indüksiyon öncesi sedasyon skorunda tespit edilmiş, yüksek doz ketamin içeren grupta daha derin bir sedasyon düzeyi sağlanmıştır. Sonuç: Her iki rejimin de otistik çocuklarda başarılı premedikasyon sağladığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

CİĞERLİ, O. K., TUĞRUL, M., YAKUPOĞLU, S., KINACI, C., AKPİR, K. (2012). Comparison of the effectiveness of two different combinations of oral ketamine and midazolam premedication in autistic children. ENT Updates, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 100–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/986839

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, et al. Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1648-54.
  2. Mc Caan ME, Kain ZN. The management of preoperative anxiety in children: an update. Anesth Analg 2001;93:98-105.
  3. Van der Walt JH, Moran C. An audit of perioperative management of autistic children. Paediatr Anaesth 2001;11:401-8. Rainey L, van der Walt JH. The anesthetic management of autistic children. Anaesth Intensive Care 1998;26:682-6. Bachenberg KL. Oral ketamine for the management of combative autistic children. Anesthesiology 1988;89:549-50.
  4. Chistiansen E, Chambers N. Induction of anesthesia in a combative child; management and issues. Paediatr Anesth 2005;15:421-5.
  5. Shah S, Shah S, Apuya J, Gopalakrishnan S, Martin T. Combination of oral ketamine and midazolam as a premedication for a severely autistic and combative patient. J.Anesth 2009;23:126-8.
  6. Gutstein H, Johnson K, Heard M, Gregory G. Oral ketamine preanesthetic medication in children. Anesthesiology 1992;76:28-3.
  7. Sekerci CM, Donmez A, Ates Y, Okten F. Oral ketamine premedication in children (placebo controlled double blind study). Eur J Anaesthesiol 1996;13:606-11.
  8. Viitanen H, Annila P, Viitanen M, Tarkkila. Premedication with midazolam delays recovery after ambulatory sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg 1999;89:75-9.
  9. Viitanen H, Annila P, Viitanen M, Yli-Hankala A. Midazolam premedication delays recovery from propofol-induced sevoflurane anesthesia in children 1-3 yr. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:76671. Filatov SM, Baer GA, Rorarius G, Oikkonen. Efficacy and safety of premedication with oral ketamine for day-case adenoidectomy compared with rectal diazepam/diclofenac and EMLA. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:118-24.
  10. Debnath S, Pande Y. A comparative study of oral premedication in children with ketamine and midazolam. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2003;47:45-7. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 89 -91. Darlong V, Shende D, Subramanyam MS, Sunder R, Naik A. Oral ketamine or midazolam or low dose combination for premedication in children. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004;32:246-9.
  11. Funk W, Jakob W, Riedl T, Taeger K. Oral preanaesthetic premedication for children: double-blind randomized study of combination of midazolam and ketamine alone. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:335-40.
  12. Warner DL, Cabaret J, Velling D. Ketamine plus midazolam, a most effective pediatric premedicant. Paediatr Anaesth 1995