SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitimde Politika Analizleri ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 - Cilt 10, Sayı 1, 2015

A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey

Sümer Aktan
Pages
59–70
Publication Date
2016-05-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the final chapter of the study, the significance of the studies developed around the education history in Turkey within the context of the curriculum history and the relations between the education history and the curriculum history were analyzed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Curriculum is generally defined based on the philosophical perspectives of the individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the second chapter, the period between 1918 and 1938 in the USA, during which curriculum studies have been institutionalized, was described and then the development process of the curriculum history as a field in curriculum studies was analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the final chapter of the study, the significance of the studies developed around the education history in Turkey within the context of the curriculum history and the relations between the education history and the curriculum history were analyzed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Curriculum studies · the curriculum history · research on the curriculum history

Abstract

Curriculum is generally defined based on the philosophical perspectives of the individuals. One of the definitions of curriculum states that curriculum is a field of academic study and research, having an intrinsic research systematic, theory, and tradition. From this perspective, this study is designed as three main chapters. The first chapter consists of the development process of curriculum as a field of academic study. In the second chapter, the period between 1918 and 1938 in the USA, during which curriculum studies have been institutionalized, was described and then the development process of the curriculum history as a field in curriculum studies was analyzed. In the final chapter of the study, the significance of the studies developed around the education history in Turkey within the context of the curriculum history and the relations between the education history and the curriculum history were analyzed

🔖

Cite This Article

Aktan, S. (2016). A Review of Curriculum History and the Conceptual Framework of Curriculum History in Turkey. Eğitimde Politika Analizleri ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 - Cilt 10, Sayı 1, 2015, 59–70. https://ajindex.com/articles/986178

References (10)

  1. Bailyn, B. (1960). Education in the forming of American society: Needs and oppotunities for study. Virginia: Chapel Hill. University of North Carolina Press. Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi / The Ottoman Archive of Prime Ministery [BOA]. Mf. Mkt. 1331/1118. 30; Mf. Mkt. 1313 / 283.19; Mf. Mkt. 1325 / 997.52. Behar-Horenstein, S. L. (2000). Can the modern view of curriculum be refined by postmodern criticism? In J. Glanz & L.S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Paradigm debates in curriculum and supervision: Modern and postmodern perspectives. Westport: Bergin & Garvey. Bellack, A. A. (1969). History of curriculum thought and practice. Review of Educational Research, 39 (3), pp. 283-292.
  2. Bobbitt, J. F. (1918). The curriculum. Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company. Bobbitt, J. F. (1924). How to make a curriculum.Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Company Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Compayré, G. (1886). The history of pedagogy. (W. H. Payne, Trans.). Boston: D. C. Heath & Company. Compayré, G. (1907). Herbert and education by instruction. (M. A. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. Publishers.
  3. Cremin, L. A. (1964). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education. New York: Vintage Books. Cubberley, P. E. (1947). Public education in the United States: A study and interpretation of American educational history. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. DeGarmo, C. (1895). Herbert and the Herbertians. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Dunkel, B. H. (1969). Herbertianism comes to America: Part II. History of Education Quarterly, 9(3). pp. 376-390.
  4. Ergin, O. (1977). Türk maarif tarihi. İstanbul:
  5. Eser Matbaası. Ertürk, S. (1972). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara:
  6. Meteksan. Fortna, B. C. (2005). Mekteb-i Hümayun: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun son döneminde İslam, devlet ve eğitim. (P. Siral, Çev.). İstanbul:
  7. İletişim Yayınları.
  8. Giroux, H., Penna, A., & Pinar, W. (1981). Curriculum and instruction: Alternatives in education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. Goodlad, J. I. (1985). Curriculum as a field of study. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education. Pergamon: Oxford. pp. 1141-1144.
  9. Gökmenoğlu, T. & Eret, E. (2010). Eğitim programları ve öğretim anabilim dalı araştırma görevlilerinin bakış açısıyla Türkiye’de program geliştirme. İlköğretim Online, 10(2), 667-681. [Online]: http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
  10. Herbart, J. F. (1896). The science of ed