SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL RISKS AND FIRM VALUE: AN APPLICATION ON ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE COMPANIES

FİNANSAL RİSKLER İLE FİRMA DEĞERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN BELİRLENMESİ: BORSA İSTANBUL FİRMALARI ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Emre Esat TOPALOĞLU
Pages
287–301
Publication Date
2018-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it has been revealed that in order to increase their firm value, Borsa Istanbul 100 index firms should consider sales and receivable policies, financial decisions, liquidity position and exchange rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is aimed at revealing the relationship between financial risks and firm value.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the data from the firms, whose shares are continuously traded on Borsa Istanbul 100 Index between 2012-2017, is analyzed by the panel data analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it has been revealed that in order to increase their firm value, Borsa Istanbul 100 index firms should consider sales and receivable policies, financial decisions, liquidity position and exchange rates.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Finansal Riskler · Firma Değeri · Borsa İstanbul

Abstract

This study is aimed at revealing the relationship between financial risks and firm value. In this context, the data from the firms, whose shares are continuously traded on Borsa Istanbul 100 Index between 2012-2017, is analyzed by the panel data analysis. Financial risks are represented by interest, capital, currency, liquidity and credit risks. Firm value is measured by Tobin Q, Market Value/Book Value and Price/Earning ratios. Within the scope of the analysis, three different models are specified. In the first model, while a negative and significant relationship was found between capital and liquidity risks and Tobin Q, no significant relationship was observed with currency, credit and interest risk. In the second model, while a negative and significant relationship was found between credit risk and Market Value/Book Value, no significant relationship was observed with interest, capital, currency and liquidity risks. In the third model, while a negative and significant relationship was found between credit and currency risks and Price/Earning ratio, no significant relationship was observed with interest, capital and liquidity risks. Consequently, it has been revealed that in order to increase their firm value, Borsa Istanbul 100 index firms should consider sales and receivable policies, financial decisions, liquidity position and exchange rates.

Özet

Çalışmada, finansal riskler ile firma değeri arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, 2012-2017 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul 100 Endeksinde pay senetleri devamlı olarak işlem gören firmalara ilişkin veriler, panel veri analizi ile incelenmiştir. Finansal riskler, faiz, sermaye, kur, likidite ve kredi riskleri ile temsil edilmiştir. Firma değeri ise Tobin’s Q, Piyasa Değeri/Defter Değeri ve Fiyat/Kazanç oranları ile ölçülmüştür. Analiz kapsamında üç farklı model oluşturulmuştur. Birinci modelde sermaye ve likidite riskleri ile TQ arasında anlamlı ve negatif ilişki tespit edilirken, kur, kredi ve faiz riski ile anlamlı herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. İkinci modelde, kredi riski ile Piyasa Değeri/Defter Değeri oranı arasında anlamlı ve negatif ilişki tespit edilirken, faiz, sermaye, kur ve likidite riskleri ile anlamlı herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir. Üçüncü modelde ise kur ve kredi riskleri ile Fiyat/Kazanç oranı arasında anlamlı ve negatif ilişki tespit edilirken, faiz, sermaye ve likidite riskleri ile anlamlı herhangi bir ilişki tespit edilememiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPALOĞLU, E. E. (2018). DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL RISKS AND FIRM VALUE: AN APPLICATION ON ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE COMPANIES. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 287–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/98456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ALLAYANNIS, G. ve WESTON, J. P. (2001). The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm Market Value, Review of Financial Studies, 14 (1), 243-276.
  2. AZİM, A., HASSAN, M. ve ZAKİA, A. (2015). Risk Management And Disclosure And Their Impact on Firm Value: The Case of Egypt, International Journal of Business, Accounting, & Finance, 9(1), 30-43.
  3. BALTAGI, B. H. (2013).
  4. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Fifth Edition Chichester: Jhon Wiley&Sons Ltd. BALTAGI, B. H. ve LI, Q. (1991). A Joint Test for Serial Correlation and Random Individual Effects, Statistics and Probability Letters, 11, 277-280.
  5. BALTAGI, H. B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. England: Wiley. BECK, N. ve KATZ, J. (1995). What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data, American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.
  6. BHARGAVA, A., FRANZINI, L. ve NARENDRANATHAN, W. (1982). Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model, The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4), 533–549.
  7. BORN, B., BREITUNG, J. (2016). Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models, Econometric Reviews, 35(7), 1290-1316. BORSA İSTANBUL (www.borsaistanbul.com), Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2018.
  8. BREUSCH, T. S. ve PAGAN, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test And Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  9. ÇAĞDAŞ, B. ve GÜRSOY, C. T. (2003). Şirketlerde Finansal Risk Yönetimi Amaçlı Bir Modelin Geliştirilmesi Yöntem ve Aşamaları, İtüdergisi/d mühendislik, 2(3), 55-64.
  10. DAMODARAN, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any of Any Asset, USA: John Wiley & Sons. FATHI, S., ZAREI, F. ve ESFAHANI, S. S. (2012). Studying the Role of Financial Risk Management on Return on Equity, International Journal of Business and Management, 7(9), 215-221.
  11. GONZALEZ, F. P. ve YUN, H. (2013). Risk Management and Firm Value: Evidence from Weather Derivatives, The Journal of Finance, 68(5), 2143-2176.
  12. GREGORY, J. (2015). The XVA Challenge: Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral and Capital, John Wiley & Sons: United Kingdom. HAIR, J., ANDERSON, R., TATHAM, R. ve BLACK, W. (1998).
  13. Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. HONDA, Y. (1985). Testing The Error Components Model With Non-Normal Disturbances, Review of Economic Studies, 52, 681-690.
  14. MUTETI, S. R. (2014). Relationship Between Financial Risk Management And Financial Performance of Commercial Banks In Kenya, Kenya: A Research Project, Co