Journals / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2013 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Plagiarism: Examination of Conceptual Issues and Evaluation of Research Findings on Using Detection Services

Pages
212–221
Publication Date
2013-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the authors discuss their own perspective on the issue of implementing PDS in various educational contexts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this review is to analyze and evaluate the research findings on using Plagiarism Detection Services (PDS) in universities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Subsequently, the pragmatic forms of student plagiarism are listed and PDS strategies on detecting plagiarism are accounted briefly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the authors discuss their own perspective on the issue of implementing PDS in various educational contexts.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Plagiarism detection services · Plagiarism forms · Plagiarism prevention

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to analyze and evaluate the research findings on using Plagiarism Detection Services (PDS) in universities. In order to do that, conceptual issues about plagiarism are examined and the complex nature of plagiarism is discussed. Subsequently, the pragmatic forms of student plagiarism are listed and PDS strategies on detecting plagiarism are accounted briefly. Research findings are categorized into four interconnected areas: (a) effectiveness and efficiency of PDS; (b) university and course context; (c) perceptions and attitudes towards use of PDS from educators; and (d) perceptions and attitudes towards use of PDS from students. Finally, the authors discuss their own perspective on the issue of implementing PDS in various educational contexts.

🔖

Cite This Article

KONSTANTİNİDİS, A., THEODOSİADOU, D., PAPPOS, C. (2013). Plagiarism: Examination of Conceptual Issues and Evaluation of Research Findings on Using Detection Services. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 212–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/984520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anderson, I. (2009). Avoiding plagiarism in academic writing. Nursing Standard, 23(18), 35-37.
  2. Atkinson, D. & Yeoh, S. (2008). Student and staff perceptions of the effectiveness of plagiarism detection software. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 222-240.
  3. Badge, J.L., Cann, A.J., & Scott, J. (2007). To cheat or not to cheat? A trial of the JISC Plagiarism Detection Service with biological sciences students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 433-439.
  4. Badge, J. & Scott, J. (2009). Dealing with plagiarism in the digital age. School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester. Retrieved on 10 may 2013 from http://evidencenet. pbworks.com/f/Badge_Scott_plagiarism.pdf Barrett, R. & Malcolm, J. (2006). Embedding plagiarism education in the assessment process. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(1), 38-45. Retrieved on 10 may 2013 from: http://www.ojs. unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/viewFile/23/18 Bilic-Zulle, L., Azman, J., Frkovic, V., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students from Plagiarizing? Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 139-147.
  5. Bouville, M. (2008). Plagiarism: Words and Ideas. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 311-322.
  6. Braumoeller, B.F. & Gaines, B.J. (2001). Actions do speak louder than words: Deterring plagiarism with the use of plagiarism-detection software. Political Science & Politics, 34, 835-839.
  7. Bretag, T. & Mahmud, S. (2009). A model for determining student plagiarism: Electronic detection and academic judgment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(1), Article 6. Retrieved on 10 may 2013 from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article= 1076&context=jutlp Burg, B., Gilroy, S., Heath, K., Herron, J., Jehn, T., Orbán, K., Rosenzweig, J., Ryan,S., Sommers, N., Sutherland, S., & Zakarin, B. (2007).
  8. Writing with Internet Sources, Expository Writing Program, Harvard College, USA. Retrieved on 10 may 2013 from http://isites.harvard. edu/fs/docs/icb.topic500638.files/Writing_with_Internet_Sources.pdf Center for educational resources (2006). Deterring and detecting plagiarism with Turnitin.com. Retrieved on 10 may 2013 from http://www.cer.jhu.edu/pdf/turnitintips.pdf
  9. Carbone, N. (2002). Re: a Rebuttal of Turnitin.com. Strategies for Teaching with Online Tools 1 February 2002. Retrieved on 10 may 2013 from http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/ technotes/ hccworkshop/missedplagiarism.htm Chester, G. (2001). Pilot of free-text plagiarism