SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

The Question of Derogations in European Integration Studies

AVRUPA BÜTÜNLEŞMESİ ÇALIŞMALARINDA DEROGASYONLAR MESELESİ

Didem BUHARİ GÜLMEZ
Diğdem SOYALTIN COLELLA
Pages
437–468
Publication Date
2020-01-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study puts forward conceptual and theoretical criticisms against the issue of derogations and demonstrates the limitations of the rationalist accounts of European integration through an investigation of various cases of EU derogations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This essay aims to investigate the role of derogations in European integration studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, the following questions will be discussed: how is a derogation defined within the EU context?
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study puts forward conceptual and theoretical criticisms against the issue of derogations and demonstrates the limitations of the rationalist accounts of European integration through an investigation of various cases of EU derogations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Avrupa Birliği · bütünleşme · derogasyon

Abstract

This essay aims to investigate the role of derogations in European integration studies. Accordingly, the following questions will be discussed: how is a derogation defined within the EU context? Who attributes the derogatory rights to whom and under what conditions? What are the implications of derogations on the ongoing integration process? The question of derogations has been partially covered by studies in law, organizational sociology and political science. This study puts forward conceptual and theoretical criticisms against the issue of derogations and demonstrates the limitations of the rationalist accounts of European integration through an investigation of various cases of EU derogations.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Avrupa bütünleşmesi çalışmalarında derogasyonların rolünü incelemektir. Bu kapsamda şu sorulara yanıt aranmaktadır: Derogasyon Avrupa bütünleşmesi bağlamında nasıl tanımlanmaktadır? Derogasyon hakkı kim tarafından hangi kriterlere göre devletlere verilebilir? Bütünleşme sürecine derogasyonların etkisi nasıl olmuştur? Yer yer Hukuk, örgüt sosyolojisi ve siyaset bilimi literatürlerinde konu edilen derogasyon meselesine kavramsal ve kuramsal açıdan eleştiriler getiren bu çalışma, çeşitli AB derogasyonlarının vaka analizleri yoluyla Avrupa bütünleşmesine ilişkin rasyonalist açıklamaların yetersiz kaldığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLMEZ, D. B., COLELLA, D. S. (2020). The Question of Derogations in European Integration Studies. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 437–468. https://ajindex.com/articles/9820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alter, Karen ve Sophie Meunier-Aitsahalia. “Judicial Politics in the European Community: European Integration and the Pathbreaking Cassis de Dijon Decision.” Comparative Political Studies 26, no 1 (1994): 535-61.
  2. Arda, Atilla. “Member States’ Right to Derogate from the European Treaties: A Commentary on Article 297 TEC.” İçinde C. Campbell, P.Herzog ve Gudrun Zagel (der.), Smit & Herzog on the Law of the European Union. New York: Matthew Bender, 2005. https://ssrn.com/abstract=925570
  3. Aspinwall, Mark ve Gerard Schneider. “Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 38, no 1(2000): 1–36.
  4. Bauer, Michael W., Christoph Knill ve Diana Pitschel. “Differential Europeanization in Eastern Europe: The Impact of Diverse EU Regulatory Governance Patterns.” Journal of European Integration 29, no 4(2007): 405–23.
  5. Balkır, Canan ve Diğdem Soyaltın. Avrupalılaşma: Tarihçe, Kuram, Kavram ve Türkiye Uygulaması. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018.
  6. Bergström, CF., Farrell, H. & Héritier, A. “Legislate or delegate? Bargaining over implementation and legislative authority in the EU.” West European Politics 30, no 2(2007): 338-66.
  7. Börzel, Tanja A. “Mind the Gap! European Integration between Level and Scope.” Journal of European Public Policy 12, (2005): 21-20.
  8. Börzel, Tanja ve Thomas Risse. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.” İçinde The Politics of Europeanization, editörler Kevin Featherstone ve Claudio Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  9. Herzog, Peter, Christian Campbell ve Gudrun Zagel. (der.) Smit & Herzog on the Law of the European Union. New York: LexisNexis / Matthew Bender, 2005.
  10. Checkel, Jeffery. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55, no 3(2001): 553–88.
  11. Checkel, Jeffery. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59, no 1(2005): 801–26.
  12. Cohen, Albert K. “Deviance and Social Problems.” İçinde Stability and Social Change, editörler Bernard Barber ve Alex Inkeles. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.
  13. Cowles, Maria G., James Caporaso e Thomas Risse, T. (der.) Transforming Europe. Ithaca ve London: Cornell University Press, 2001.
  14. Cremona, Marise ve Nikos Skoutaris. “Speaking of the derogations: accommodating a solution of the Cyprus issue within the Union legal order.” Journal of Balkan and Ne