SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Anatomic Variations of Abdominal Aorta

Abdominal Aorta Anatomik Varyasyonları

Özlem GÜNGÖR
Ömer Faruk GÜLER
Cansu ÖZTÜRK
Selma UYSAL RAMADAN
Pages
53–58
Publication Date
2018-08-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Twenty-one of extrarenal RA (10.5%) were a hilar artery and 2(%1) of these were superior polar artery.Conclusion: Multi-detector computed tomography angiography is a highly reliable, noninvasive imaging method for the evaluation of abdominal vascular anatomy and its variations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the ratio of variations observed in the anatomy of the celiac artery( CA), superior mesenteric artery(SMA), and renal artery (RA) by screening a patient population who underwent abdominal multi-detector computed tomography angiography.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients who underwent abdominal multi-detector computed tomography angiographyfor various reasons were analyzed retrospectively and the prevalence of the variations observed in the CA, SMA, and RA were determined.Results: A normal anatomy of the celiac artery was determined in 80 of the 100 cases (80%).The most common CA variation was gastro-splenic trunk (12%).
📊
Key Findings & Data:We determined normal SMA anatomy in 83 of the total 100 cases (83%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Twenty-one of extrarenal RA (10.5%) were a hilar artery and 2(%1) of these were superior polar artery.Conclusion: Multi-detector computed tomography angiography is a highly reliable, noninvasive imaging method for the evaluation of abdominal vascular anatomy and its variations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ÇKBT · varyant anatomi · abdominal aorta

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the ratio of variations observed in the anatomy of the celiac artery( CA), superior mesenteric artery(SMA), and renal artery (RA) by screening a patient population who underwent abdominal multi-detector computed tomography angiography.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients who underwent abdominal multi-detector computed tomography angiographyfor various reasons were analyzed retrospectively and the prevalence of the variations observed in the CA, SMA, and RA were determined.Results: A normal anatomy of the celiac artery was determined in 80 of the 100 cases (80%).The most common CA variation was gastro-splenic trunk (12%). We determined normal SMA anatomy in 83 of the total 100 cases (83%). The most common variation of SMA was a replaced right hepatic artery originating from the SMA in 12 cases (12%). While a single RA with normal branching pattern was observed in 177 kidneys (% 84) in 200 kidneys, early branching of RA was observed in 9 (4.5%) kidneys. Extrarenal RA was observed in 23 (11.5%) kidney. Twenty-one of extrarenal RA (10.5%) were a hilar artery and 2(%1) of these were superior polar artery.Conclusion: Multi-detector computed tomography angiography is a highly reliable, noninvasive imaging method for the evaluation of abdominal vascular anatomy and its variations.

Özet

Giriş: Çalışmamızın amacı, abdominal çok kesitli bilgisayarlı tomografi (ÇKBT) incelemesi yapılan hasta popülasyonunda çölyak arter(ÇA), süperior mezenterik arter(SMA) ve renal arter (RA) anatomisindeki varyasyonları saptamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çeşitli nedenlerle abdominal ÇKBT incelemesi yapılan toplam 100 hasta geriye dönük olarak değerlendirilerek ÇA, SMA ve RA varyasyonlarının sıklığı araştırılmıştır. Bulgular: 100 vakanın 80’inde (%80) normal ÇA anatomisi izlenmiştir. En sık rastlanan ÇA varyasyonu gastro-splenik trunkus (%12) olarak saptanmıştır. Normal SMA, 100 olgunun 83’ünde gözlendi. SMA'nın en sık varyasyonu 12 olgu (%12) ile SMA'dan orjin alan replase sağ hepatik arterdir. İki yüz böbrekten 177 böbrekte (%84) tek ana RA normal dallanma paterni varken, bunlardan 9 (%4.5) böbrekte erken dallanma gözlendi. Ekstrarenal RA ise 23 (%11.5) böbrekte gözlendi. Bu 21 böbrekte aksesuar (%10.5) hiler arter mevcutken, 2 tanesinde superior polar arter (%1) izlendi. Sonuç: ÇKBT anjiyografi abdominal vasküler anatomi ve varyasyonların değerlendirilmesinde kullanılacak oldukça güvenilir, invaziv olmayan ve günümüzde rahat ulaşılabilir bir görüntüleme metodudur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖR, Ö., GÜLER, Ö. F., ÖZTÜRK, C., RAMADAN, S. U. (2018). Anatomic Variations of Abdominal Aorta. Akademik Araştırma Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 53–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/981418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Prokop M. Multislice CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 2000;36:86-96
  2. Duddalwar VA. Multislice CT angiography in vascular imaging and intervention. Br J Radiol 2004;77:S27-38
  3. Catalano OA, Singh AH, Uppot RN, et al. Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: implications for liver surgery. Radiographics 2008;28:359-78
  4. Winston CB, Lee NA, Jarnagin WR, et al. CT angiography for delineation of celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery variants in patients undergoing hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:W13-9
  5. Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, et al: Gray's Anatomy, 37th Ed, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone; 1989
  6. Moore M.K. Çeviri Editörleri: Yıldırım M., Okar İ., Dalçık H.: İnsan Embriyolojisi Klinik Yönleri ile,1. baskı, İstanbul; 2002: 380-394
  7. Chen H, Yano R, Emura S, et al. Anatomic Variation of The Celiac Trunk with Special Reference to Hepatic Artery Patterns. Ann Anat. 2009; 191.399–407
  8. Vandamme JPJ, Bonte J. The Branches of The Celiac Trunk. Acta anat. 1985; 122:110–4
  9. Göktay AY, Seçil M. Çölyak Trunkus ve Hepatik Arterlerin Normal Dallanma Varyasyonları: Anjiografik Bulgular. Tanısal ve Girişimsel Radyoloji. 2001; 7: 226–31
  10. Yang Y, Jiang N, Lu MQ, et al. Anatomical Variation of The Donor Hepatic Arteries:Analysis of 843 Cases. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2007; 27:1164-6
  11. Uzun A, Ulcay T, Kosif R, Baş O, Emirzeoğlu M. Anomalies of number and orıgın of the renal artery: case report and review of the literature. J. Urol. 2002;28:452-7
  12. Özkan U, Oğuzkurt L, Tercan F, Kızılkılıç O, Koç Z, Koca N. Renal artery origins and variations: Angiographic Evaluation of 855 Consecutive Patients. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2006;12:183-18
  13. Satyapal K.S,Haffejee A.A,Singh B, Ramsaroop L, Robbs J.V,Kalidden I.M. Additional renal arteries. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001;23:33-8
  14. Benedetti E, Troppmann C, Gillingham K, David E.R, Sutherland, William D, Payne, Dunn L.D, Matas J.A, Najarian S.J, Gruessner G.W.R. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries. Ann. of Surgery. 1995; 221:406-14
  15. Cuxart M, Picazo M, Matas M, Canalias J, Nadal C, Falcó J. Arterial hypertension and stenosis of the accessory renal artery. Nefrologia 2007;27:509-10
  16. Ferrari R, De Cecco CN, Lafrate F, et al. Anatomical variations of coeliac trunk and the mesenteric arteries evaluated with 64-row CT angiography: Radiol Med 2007;112:988-98
  17. Song SY, Chung JW, Yin YH, et al. Celiac axis and com