Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 Sayı: 6

Analysis of the complications of the collum femoris preserving (CFP) prostheses

Femur boyun koruyucu (FBK) protezlerin yol açtığı komplikasyonların analizi

Pages
623–627
Publication Date
2015-01-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty with CFP prosthesis appears to be a good option for young patients for a variety of etiologies but close attention should be paid to the prevention of complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the collum femoris preserving (CFP) prosthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included the 142 hips of 125 patients (mean age: 50 years; range: 38 to 60 years) who underwent THA with CFP prosthesis between January 2004 and December 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty with CFP prosthesis appears to be a good option for young patients for a variety of etiologies but close attention should be paid to the prevention of complications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Artroplasti · femur boyun koruyucu protez · kalça eklemi

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the collum femoris preserving (CFP) prosthesis. Methods: The study included the 142 hips of 125 patients (mean age: 50 years; range: 38 to 60 years) who underwent THA with CFP prosthesis between January 2004 and December 2011. There were 70 males (82 hips) and 55 females (60 hips). Patients were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Radiographs were evaluated according to the Gruen zones and DeLee and Charnley zones to assess the prosthesis position, loosening and ectopic ossification. Results: Follow-up was obtained over 4.72±2.16 (range: 1 to 8.4) years and no patients were lost to follow-up. Mean HHS improved from 51.43±4.14 points preoperatively to 90.27±6.60 points postoperatively, while VAS scores decreased from 8.3±3.12 to 2.1±1.54 by the final review. The HHS revealed excellent and good results in 87.4% of patients. Mild ectopic ossification occurred in 4 cases (2.8%), which were all Grade 1 according to the Brooker classification and without clinical symptoms. In 5 cases (3.5%), bone loss was found in the proximal femur. Radiolucent lines surrounding the stem were not observed in any case. There was no prosthesis loosening or femoral prosthesis subsidence. The survival rate was 100% for the femoral and acetabular components. Ten fractures (7%) of the lateral femoral diaphysis at the tip of the stem occurred during surgery and none of these required additional treatment. No infection, dislocation or deep vein thrombosis was observed. Conclusion: Total hip arthroplasty with CFP prosthesis appears to be a good option for young patients for a variety of etiologies but close attention should be paid to the prevention of complications.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı femur boyun koruyucu (FBK) protez kullanımının, total kalça artroplastisindeki (TKA) klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlarını ve komplikasyonlarını değerlendirmekti. Çalışma planı: Çalışmada, Ocak 2004 ve Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında FBK protezi ile TKA uygulanan 125 hastanın (70 erkek, 55 kadın; ortalama yaş: 50, dağılım: 38-60) 142 (82 erkek, 60 kadın) kalçası değerlendirildi. Hasta skorlamaları Harris kalça skoru (HKS) ve görsel analog skala (GAS) ile yapıldı. Radyografiler protez pozisyonu, gevşemesi ve ektopik kemikleşme analizinde kullanılan Gruen bölgeleri ile DeLee ve Charnley bölgelerine göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama 4.72±2.16 (dağılım:1-8.4) yıllık takip sırasında hiçbir hasta çalışmayı terk etmedi. Cerrahi öncesi 8.3±3.12 olan GAS skoru son takipte 2.1±1.54’e gerilerken, HKS’nin 51.43±4.14 puandan 90.27±6.60 puana geliştiği görüldü. Hastaların %87.4’ünde HKS iyi ve mükemmel olarak değerlendirildi. Brooker sınıflandırmasına göre tamamı Evre 1 olan 4 olguda (%2.8) klinik semptom olmaksızın hafif ektopik kemikleşme izlendi. Beş hastada (%3.5) proksimal femurda kemik kaybı bulundu. Stemi çevreleyen radyolüsen hatlar hiçbir olguda gözlenmedi. Yine hiçbir olguda protez gevşemesi veya femoral protez çökmesi saptanmadı. Femoral ve asetabular komponentler için sağkalım oranı %100 olarak bulundu. Ameliyat sırasında stem ucunda lateral femoral diyafizde oluşan 10 (%7.1) kırık için ek bir tedavi gereksinimi oluşmadı. Hiçbir olguda enfeksiyon, kayma ya da derin ven trombozu gözlenmedi. Çıkarımlar: Femur boyun koruyucu protez ile total kalça artroplastisi değişik etiyolojileri olan genç hastalar için iyi bir seçenek olsa da, komplikasyonların engellenmesi için yakın takip şarttır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Li, M., Hu, Y., Xie, J. (2015). Analysis of the complications of the collum femoris preserving (CFP) prostheses. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 Sayı: 6, 623–627. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2014.13.0060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Molli RG, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB,
  2. Sneller MA. A short tapered stem reduces intraoperative
  3. complications in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Or
  4. thop Relat Res 2012;470:450-61. CrossRef 2. Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison
  5. of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and
  6. total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1550- 4. CrossRef 3. Killampalli VV, Kundra RK, Chaudhry F, Chowdhry M,
  7. Fisher NE, Reading AD. Resurfacing and uncemented ar
  8. throplasty for young hip arthritis: functional outcomes at
  9. 5 years. Hip Int 2009;19:234-8. 4. Goebel D, Schultz W. The Mayo cementless femoral
  10. component in active patients with osteoarthritis. Hip Int
  11. 2009;19:206-10. 5. Ghera S, Pavan L. The DePuy Proxima hip: a short stem
  12. for total hip arthroplasty. Early experience and technical
  13. considerations. Hip Int 2009;19:215-20. 6. Ettinger M, Ettinger P, Lerch M, Radtke K, Budde S, Eze
  14. chieli M, et al. The NANOS short stem in total hip ar
  15. throplasty: a mid term follow-up. Hip Int 2011;21:583-6. 7. Zeh A, Weise A, Vasarhelyi A, Bach AG, Wohlrab D.
  16. Medium-term results of the Mayo™ short-stem hip pros
  17. thesis after avascular necrosis of the femoral head. [Article
  18. in German] Z Orthop Unfall 2011;149:200-5. [Abstract] 8. Pipino F, Molfetta L. Femoral neck preservation in total
  19. hip replacement. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1993;19:5-12. 9. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of fail
  20. ure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a ra
  21. diographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res
  22. 1979;141:17-27. 10. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of ce
  23. mented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop
  24. Relat Res 1976;121:20-32. 11. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr.
  25. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Inci
  26. dence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am
  27. 1973;55:1629-32. 12. Pipino F, Calderale PM. Biodynamic total hip prosthesis.
  28. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1987;13:289-97. 13. Pipino F, Molfetta L, Grandizio M. Preservation of the
  29. femoral neck in hip arthroplasty: results of a 13 to 17 year
  30. follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 2000;1:31-9. CrossRef 14. Briem D, Schneider M, Bogner N, Botha N, Gebauer M,
  31. Gehrke T, et al. Mid-term results of 155 patients treated
  32. with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short stem pros
  33. thesis. Int Orthop 2011;35:655-60. CrossRef 15. Kinov P, Radl R, Zacherl M, Leithner A, Windhager R.
  34. Correlation between thigh pain and radiological findings
  35. with a proximally porous-coated stem. Acta Orthop Belg
  36. 2007;73:618-24. 16. Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, Masri BA.
  37. Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip ar
  38. throplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg
  39. Am 2008;90:2000-12. CrossRef 17. Jakubowitz E, Seeger JB, Lee C, Heisel C, Kretzer JP,
  40. Thomsen MN. Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce
  41. periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A
  42. biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs.
  43. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:849-55. CrossRef 18. Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, Luo ZP. Bone remodeling
  44. characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J
  45. Arthroplasty 2009;24:945-50. CrossRef 19. Gillies RM, Kohan L, Cordingley R. Periprosthetic bone
  46. remodelling of a collum femoris preserving cementless ti
  47. tanium femoral hip replacement. Comput Methods Bio
  48. mech Biomed Engin 2007;10:97-102. CrossRef 20. Hayashi S, Nishiyama T, Fujishiro T, Kanzaki N, Hashi
  49. moto S, Kurosaka M. Periprosthetic bone mineral density
  50. with a cementless triple tapered stem is dependent on dai
  51. ly activity. Int Orthop 2012;36:1137-42. CrossRef 21. Rama KR, Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Borgmann R,
  52. Roy A, Lavigne M. Heterotopic ossification after surface
  53. replacement arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: a ran
  54. domized study. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:256-62. CrossRef 22. Ritter MA, Galley M. Heterotopic bone formation follow
  55. ing resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. HSS J 2011;7:41-3.