Journals / Renewable Energy Sources Energy Policy and Energy Management / 2021 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Capacity Calculation and Subsidization Proposals for Rooftop PV Energy for a Residential Building in Istanbul

Pages
1–23
Publication Date
2021-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Rooftop PV system design, renewable energy, solar energy feasibility, energy production for self consumption, energy subsidization policy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Urban transformation works ongoing in the metropolitan cities pose an opportunity for application of PV energy for multi-story residential buildings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, feasibility of a 6-story (14 units) residential building’s PV energy production capacity for İstanbul is calculated using PVsyst software and it is calculated that the payback time for the household owners is 23 years without any sell-back scheme.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Rooftop PV system design, renewable energy, solar energy feasibility, energy production for self consumption, energy subsidization policy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rooftop PV system design · renewable energy · solar energy feasibility

Abstract

Urban transformation works ongoing in the metropolitan cities pose an opportunity for application of PV energy for multi-story residential buildings. In this study, feasibility of a 6-story (14 units) residential building’s PV energy production capacity for İstanbul is calculated using PVsyst software and it is calculated that the payback time for the household owners is 23 years without any sell-back scheme. When excess energy is sold back to the grid at 13.3 cents/kWh, the payback time could reduce to 6.6 years. A sell-back price of 4 cents/kWh, that is lower than the 6 cents/kWh of production cost of conventional power plants, shows a payback time of 13.25 years, suggesting a policy to replace investment on new power plants with PV self-production as a sustainable yet more feasible alternative. Keywords: Rooftop PV system design, renewable energy, solar energy feasibility, energy production for self consumption, energy subsidization policy.

Özet

Büyük şehirlerde süregelen kentsel dönüşüm çalışmaları, çok katlı konut binlarının elektrik ihtiyaçları için güneş pillerinin (PV) kullanımı konusunda fırsat sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, İstanbul’da 6 katlı (14 daireli) bir konut binası için PV enerji üretim kapasitesi PVsyst yazılımı ile hesaplanmış ve ev sahipleri için maliyetin geri dönüşü, fazla enerjinin sisteme satılmadığı durum için 23 yıl olarak hesaplanmıştır. Fazla enerjinin 13,3 sent/kWh fiyatla sisteme satılması halinde maliyetin geri dönüşü 6,6 yıl olabilmektedir. Konvansiyonel elektrik santrallerinin elektrik üretim maliyeti olan 6 sent/kWh’in dahi altında kalan 4 sent/kWh geri satım fiyatı ile 13,25 olarak hesaplanan yatırım geri dönüş süresi, yeni elektrik santralleri yerine PV ile kendi enerjisini üretme politikasının daha sürdürülebilir olmanın yanında ekonomik olarak da anlamlı olabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖYLÜOĞLU, Ö., ÇÖL, M. (2021). Capacity Calculation and Subsidization Proposals for Rooftop PV Energy for a Residential Building in Istanbul. Renewable Energy Sources Energy Policy and Energy Management, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 1–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/975372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. P. Nejat, F. Jomehzadeh, M. M. Taheri, M. Gohari and M. Z. Abd. Majid, "A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 843-863, 2015. T. C. o. E. Engineers, "UCTA The Chamber of Electrical Engineers," 28 February 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/c5aa4d5e03b92df_ek.pdf?tipi=41&turu=X&sube=0. M. Munasinghe, "Sustainomics and Sustainable Development," 7 May 2007. [Online]. Available: https://editors.eol.org/eoearth/wiki/Sustainomics_and_sustainable_development. "T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı," [Online]. Available: https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-elektrik. [Accessed December 2020]. E. T. Karagöl and İ. Kavaz, "Dünyada ve Türkiye'de Yenilenebilir Enerji," Analiz, Seta, vol. 197, 2017. T. Taner and A. Dalkılıç, "A Feasibility Study of Solar Energy-Techno Economic Analysis From Aksaray City, Turkey," Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25-30, 2019. O. Ozcan and F. Ersoz, "Project and cost-based evaluation of solar energy performance in three different geographical regions of Turkey: Investment analysis application," Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 2019.
  2. M. Öztürk, B. B. Çırak and N. Özek, "Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Domestic Photovoltaic System," Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2012.
  3. İ. Üçgül, E. Tüysüzoğlu and M. Z. Yakut, "Energy Calculation and Economic Analysis for the Implementation of the PV Roof," Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sceince, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1-6, 2014. H. Sogukpinar and I. Bozkurt, "An Economic Analysis of Residential PV System for Adıyaman, Turkey," Uludağ Unversity Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 111-118, 2015. A. Nur and A. Buğutekin, "Solar PV System Cost Analysis for a Smart Home," International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 152-163, 2017.
  4. S. Ahsan, K. Javed, A. S. Rana and M. Zeeshan, "Design and Cost Analysis of 1 kW Photovoltaic System Based on Actual Performance in INdian Scenario," Perspectives in Science, vol. 8, pp. 642-644, 2016. H. Zenk, "Low Cost Provides of the Energy Needs of Plateau Houses by Using Photovoltaic Systems," Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1768-1774, 2018.
  5. Y. Moumouni, R. J. Baker and J. R. Souba, "Analysis of a