Journals / International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering / 2017 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3

Data Fusion-Based Multimodal Biometric System for Face Recognition Using Manhattan Distance Penalty Weight

Pages
1441–1452
Publication Date
2017-07-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Experimental results show that the proposed multimodal system performs better than the unimodal system and other multimodal systems that use different data fusion rules (e.g.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we propose a multimodal biometric face recognition technique which is mainly based on the 2D Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Data Fusion (DF) and utilizes data fusion techniques at the score level of the system algorithm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first two feature vectors are generated from raw images by using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Local Binary Pattern (LBP) methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Experimental results show that the proposed multimodal system performs better than the unimodal system and other multimodal systems that use different data fusion rules (e.g.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Face recognition · discrete wavelet transform · principal component analysis

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a multimodal biometric face recognition technique which is mainly based on the 2D Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Data Fusion (DF) and utilizes data fusion techniques at the score level of the system algorithm. The technique employs three discrete unimodal feature extraction and classification methods. The first two feature vectors are generated from raw images by using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Local Binary Pattern (LBP) methods. During the generation of the third feature vector, images are initially transformed into the DWT domain. In result, approximation, vertical, horizontal and diagonal detail matrices are combined to form a Joint Feature Vector (JFV). K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifier algorithm is separately applied to the three generated feature vectors to compute different score values for the same individual. These raw score values are fused together using a newly proposed data fusion technique based on Manhattan Distance Penalty Weighting (MDPW). The proposed MDPW penalizes an individual for scoring low points and further pushes it away from the potentially winning class before data fusion is conducted. The proposed approach was implemented on ORL and YALE public face databases. The results of the proposed approach are evaluated using the recognition rates and receiver operating characteristics of the biometric classification systems. Experimental results show that the proposed multimodal system performs better than the unimodal system and other multimodal systems that use different data fusion rules (e.g. Sum Rule or Product Rule). In ORL database, the recognition rate of up to 97% can be achieved using the proposed technique.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ahmed, B., Çevik, T., ÇEVİK, N. (2017). Data Fusion-Based Multimodal Biometric System for Face Recognition Using Manhattan Distance Penalty Weight. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 1441–1452. https://ajindex.com/articles/974517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Belhumeur, P., et al., 1997. Eigenfaces versus fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 711-720.
  2. Beyreuther, M., 2011. Speech recognition based automatic earthquake detection and classification, Ludwig Maximilians University, Muenchen, Fakultaet fuer Geowissenschaften, Ph.D. thesis. Bowyer, K.W., et al., 2006. Face recognition using 2-D, 3-D, and infrared: is multimodal better than multisample ?, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 2000-2012.
  3. Bromba, M.U.A., Bioidentification frequently asked questions, available at http://www.bromba.com/faq/biofaqe.htm#ROC.
  4. Campbell, J., 1997. Speaker recognition: a tutorial, Proceedings of IEEE, 85, 9, pp. 1437-1462. CASIA iris image database, 2006. http://www.sinobiometrics.com.
  5. Chellappa, R., et al., 1995. Human and machine recognition of faces: a survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83,5, pp. 705-740.
  6. Ross, A., et al., 2006.
  7. Handbook of Multibiometrics, SpringerScience + Business Media, LLC. Ratha, N.K., et al., 1998. Image mosaicing for rolled fingerprint construction. Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recog., vol. 2, pp. 1651–1653.
  8. Singh, S., et al., 2004. Infrared and visible image fusion for face recognition. SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, pp.585-596.
  9. Heo, J. Kong, et al., 2004. Fusion of visual and thermal signatures with eyeglass removal for robust face recognition. Proc. Joint IEEE Workshop Object Tracking and Classification beyond the Visible Spectrum. Son, B., and Lee, Y., 2005. Biometric authentication system using reduced Joint feature vector of iris and face. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3546, pp. 261-273. Ross A., and Govindarajan, R., 2005. Feature level fusion using hand and face biometrics. Proc. SPIE Conf. Biometric Technology for Human Identification II, pp. 196–204.
  10. Kittler, J., et al., 1998. On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 226–239.
  11. Verlinde, P. and Cholet, G., 1999. Comparing decision fusion paradigms using k-NN based classifiers, decision trees and logistic regression in a multi-modal identity verification application. Proc. Int. Conf. Audio and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication. (AVBPA), 1999.
  12. Washington, DC, pp. 188–193.
  13. Chen, X., et al., 2005. IR and visible light face recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 99. no. 3, pp. 332–358.
  14. Das, R., 2007. Signature Recognition. Keesing Journa