SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4

Scale Development Study for Willingness to Obtain Legal Power

Yalçın Varol YILDIZBAŞ
Sevim ÖZTÜRK
Pages
769–788
Publication Date
2023-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings show that the developed scale can be used as a measurement tool with its validity and reliability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of the research is to develop a valid and reliable scale for the perception of the desire to obtain legal authority in education administration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sampling of the research consists of 390 education administrators and teachers with different statuses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings show that the developed scale can be used as a measurement tool with its validity and reliability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:educational administrator · legal power · willingness to obtain power

Abstract

The main purpose of the research is to develop a valid and reliable scale for the perception of the desire to obtain legal authority in education administration. The sampling of the research consists of 390 education administrators and teachers with different statuses. Using the easily accessible sampling technique, the types of official primary, secondary and different high schools in the central province of Van were determined. The scale draft was applied to the education administrators and teachers determined by using the purposeful cluster sampling method. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistical analysis methods. Validity analyzes and reliability analyzes of the obtained data were made. As a result of the analysis, the scale consisted of 4 factors and 32 items, and item factor loads consisted of values between “.61” and “.87”. It was determined that the resulting factors explained the perception of obtaining legal power by 77.46%. The fit index values of the scale reveals that the scale provides construct validity. While the scale's internal consistency coefficient was found to be ".95", the test-retest reliability coefficient was determined as ".92". The findings show that the developed scale can be used as a measurement tool with its validity and reliability.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZBAŞ, Y. V., ÖZTÜRK, S. (2023). Scale Development Study for Willingness to Obtain Legal Power. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4, 769–788. https://ajindex.com/articles/972096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K., Erol, E., & Salalı, E. T. (2014). Okul müdürlerinin kullandığı güç kaynakları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm algıları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between the power sources used by school principals and teachers’ perceptions of organizational cynicism]. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 3(1), 25-52.
  2. Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 67-97.
  3. Aslanargun, E. (2009). İlköğretim ve lise müdürlerinin okul yönetiminde kullandığı güç türleri [Types of power used by primary and high school principals in school management]. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  4. Aslanargun, E., & Eriş, H. M. (2013). Öğretim elemanlarının sınıf yönetiminde kullandıkları güç türleri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Developing a scale of power types used by instructors in classroom management]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2), 207-220.
  5. Aydın, M. (2010). Eğitim yönetimi [Education management]. Ankara:
  6. Hatipoğlu Yayınevi.
  7. Bakan, İ., & Büyükbeşe, T. (2010). Liderlik “türleri” ve “güç kaynakları” na ilişkin mevcut-gelecek durum karşılaştırması [Current-future situation comparison of leadership “types” and “power sources”]. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2, 73-84.
  8. Balcı, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma [Research in social sciences]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi. Başaran, İ. E. (2008). Örgütsel davranış: İnsanın üretim gücü [Organizational behavior: The productive power of human]. Ankara:
  9. Ekinoks Yayınları.
  10. Başaran, İ. E., & Çınkır, Ş. (2011). Türk eğitim sistemi ve yönetimi [Turkish education system and management]. (3. Baskı). Ankara:
  11. Ekinoks Yayınevi.
  12. Bayrak, S. (2001). Yönetimde bir ihmal konusu olarak güç ve güç yönetimi II [Power and power management as a matter of neglect in management II]. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 6(1), 23-42.
  13. Bulut, Y., & Bakan, İ. (2005). Yönetici ve yöneticilik üzerine Kahramanmaraş kentinde bir araştırma [A research on managers and management in the city of Kahramanmaraş]. Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(9), 63- 89. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2016). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama [Theory and practice in education management]. Ankara:
  14. Pegem Yayınları.
  15. Büyüköztürk, S., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, O. E., Kar