We shown that in some cases the geometric phase information is carried over to the final bipartite entangled state.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Correlation relations for the spin measurements on a pair of entangled particles scattered by the two separate arms of interferometers in hybrid setups of different types are investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Concurrence, entanglement of formation, quantum fidelity, Bures distance are used to clarify how the geometric phase affects the initial bipartite state.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We shown that in some cases the geometric phase information is carried over to the final bipartite entangled state.
Correlation relations for the spin measurements on a pair of entangled particles scattered by the two separate arms of interferometers in hybrid setups of different types are investigated. Concurrence, entanglement of formation, quantum fidelity, Bures distance are used to clarify how the geometric phase affects the initial bipartite state. This affect causes a quantum interference due to the movement of charged particles in regions where electromagnetic fields are not present. We shown that in some cases the geometric phase information is carried over to the final bipartite entangled state.
TUNALIOĞLU, M. E., ÇILDIROĞLU, H. Ö., YILMAZER, A. U. (2023). On the geometric phases in entangled states. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 65 Sayı: 2, 142–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/971359
Ehrenberg, W., Siday, R. E., The refractive index in electron optics and the principles of dynamics, Proceedings of the Physical Society, Section B 62 (1) (1949), 8–21, https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1301/62/1/303.
Pancharatnam, S., Generalized theory of interference, and its applications, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Section A 44 (5) (1956), 247–262, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03046050.
Longuet-Higgins, H. C., Opik, U., Pryce, M. H. L., Sack, R., Studies of the Jahn-Teller effect.II. The dynamical problem, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 244 (1236) (1958), 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0022.
Aharonov, Y., Bohm, D.: Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory, Phys. Rev., 115 (3) (1959), 485, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.115.485.
Berry, M. V., Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 392 (1802) (1984), 45–57.
He, X.-G., McKellar, B. H. J., Topological phase due to electric dipole moment and magnetic monopole interaction, Phys. Rev. A, 47 (1993), 3424–3425, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.3424.
Dowling, J. P., Williams, C. P., Franson, J. D., Maxwell Duality, Lorentz invariance, and topological phase, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83 (1999), 2486–2489, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2486.
Sponar, S., Klepp, J., Loidl, R., Filipp, S., Durstberger-Rennhofer, K., Bertlmann, R., Badurek, G., Rauch, H., Hasegawa, Y., Geometric phase in entangled systems: A single-neutron interferometer experiment, Phys. Rev. A, 81 (4) (2010), 042113, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.042113.
Sponar, S., Klepp, J., Durstberger-Rennhofer, K., Loidl, R., Filipp, S., Lettner, M., Bertlmann, R., Badurek, G., Rauch, H., Hasegawa, Y., New aspects of geometric phases in experiments with polarized neutrons, J. Phys. A Math. Theor., 43 (35) (2010), 354015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/35/354015.
Lepoutre, S., Gauguet, A., Trenec, G., Buchner, M., Vigue, J., He-McKellar-