Journals / Scientific Mining Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3

Evaluating machine utilization times for roadheaders used in coal mines: Regression and artificial neural network analyses

Pages
141–151
Publication Date
2023-10-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Concluding remark is that the determined MUT values and the derived estimation models for roadheaders will be very useful for coal miners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Roadheaders are extensively utilized for tunnel heading rock engineering applications all over the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To create a work plan and calculate costs, it is critical to forecast roadheader performance as precisely as possible.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Concluding remark is that the determined MUT values and the derived estimation models for roadheaders will be very useful for coal miners.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coal mining · Roadheader · Machine utilization time

Abstract

Roadheaders are extensively utilized for tunnel heading rock engineering applications all over the world. To create a work plan and calculate costs, it is critical to forecast roadheader performance as precisely as possible. Machine utilization time (MUT) is required for the calculation of daily advance rate of roadheaders. This paper investigates the values of MUT for roadheaders used in underground coal mines. The performance measurements were conducted on fifty different locations for axial machines and thirty-nine different locations for transverse machines. MUT values vary from 15 % to 37.5 % with an average of 26.3 % for axial roadheaders, and vary from 6.9 % to 37.9 % with an average of 18.4 % for transvers roadheaders. The average MUT is 25.4% for all measurements. The percentage of average support time approximately equals to the average MUT. Multiple regression and artificial neural network models were also developed for estimating MUT. Concluding remark is that the determined MUT values and the derived estimation models for roadheaders will be very useful for coal miners.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAHRAMAN, S., ROSTAMİ, M., DİBAVAR, B. (2023). Evaluating machine utilization times for roadheaders used in coal mines: Regression and artificial neural network analyses. Scientific Mining Journal, Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3, 141–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/970806

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abdolreza, Y.C., Yakhchali, S.H. 2013. A new model to predict roadheader performance using rock mass properties. Journal of Coal Science and Engineering. 19 (1), 51-56.
  2. Bilgin, N., Seyrek, T., Erdinc, E., Shahriar, K. 1990. Roadheaders clean valuable tips for Istanbul Metro. Tunnels and Tunnelling. 22, 29–32.
  3. Bilgin, N., Dincer, T., Copur, H., Erdogan, M. 2004. Some geological and geotechnical factors affecting the performance of a roadheader in an inclined tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 19, 629–636.
  4. Bilgin, N., Tumac, D. Feridunoglu, C., Karakas, A.R., Akgul, M. 2005. The performance of a roadheader in high strength rock formations in Küçüksu tunnel. Proc. of the 31th ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress. Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 815-820.
  5. Bilgin, N., Copur, H., Balci, C. 2014. Mechanical Excavation in Mining and Civil Industries. CRC Press,
  6. Taylor and Francis Group. Copur, H., Ozdemir, L., Rostami, J. 1998. Roadheader Applications in Mining and Tunneling Industries. Annual Meeting of American Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME). Orlando, Florida, March 10-12, Preprint Number: 98-185.
  7. Copur, H., Tuncdemir, H., Bilgin, N., Dincer, T. 2001. Specific energy as a criterion for the use of rapid excavation systems in Turkish mines. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Transactions Section-A Mining Technology. 110, A149–A157. Ebrahimabadi, A., Goshtasbi, K., Shahriar, K., CheraghiSeifabad, M. 2011. A model to predict the performance of roadheadersbased on rock mass brittleness index. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 111, 355-364.
  8. Gehring, K.H., 1989. A cutting comparison. Tunnels and Tunnelling. 21, 27–30.
  9. Göktan, R.M., Güneş, N. 2005. A comparative study of Schmidt hammer testing procedures with reference to rock cutting machine performance prediction. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences. 42(3), 466-472.
  10. Kahraman, E., Kahraman, S. 2016. The performance prediction of roadheaders from easy testing methods. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 75, 1585-1596.
  11. Kahraman, S., Aloglu, A. S., Aydın B., Saygın, E. 2019. The needle penetration index to estimate the performance of an axial type roadheader used in a coal mine. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources. 5, 37–45.
  12. Ocak, I., Bilgin, N. 2010. Comparative studies on the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and drilling and blasting method in the excavation of metro station tunnels