SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Medical Records / 2023 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: Supplement (1) - Innovations in Medicine and Healthcare in the 100th Year of the Republic

Nucleolus Scoring May Increase the Objectivity of Pathological Evaluation of Endometrial Cancers

Seda DUMAN ÖZTÜRK
Gökçe AŞKAN
Çiğdem ÖZTÜRK
Oğuzhan OKCU
Bayram ŞEN
Recep BEDİR
Pages
53–9
Publication Date
2023-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, adding nucleolus score in FIGO grading can provide more reliable prediction in prognosis and choice of the treatment method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Nucleolus has been shown as a prognostic parameter in many cancer types.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The presence of nucleoli were scored as 1, 2 and 3 in curettage materials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, adding nucleolus score in FIGO grading can provide more reliable prediction in prognosis and choice of the treatment method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Endometrial carcinoma · nucleolus score · FIGO grade

Abstract

Aim: Nucleolus has been shown as a prognostic parameter in many cancer types. In this study, we showed that the nucleolus score may provide more objective FIGO grading in endometrial cancers (ECs). We examined the role of nucleolus score in predicting treatment and prognosis in ECs. Material and Methods: The presence of nucleoli were scored as 1, 2 and 3 in curettage materials. The relationship between this value and clinicopathological parameters was examined. Results: Nucleolus score was associated with FIGO grade, myometrial invasion and lymphovascular invasion. The nucleolus score, which has the potential for objective evaluation,was found as an independent risk factor for disease-free survival (DFS) as well as there was an association between nucleolus score and DFS. Conclusion: Nucleolus score was associated with better prognosis in ECs. It can be evaluated objectively with no need of requiring extra cost and time. Thus, adding nucleolus score in FIGO grading can provide more reliable prediction in prognosis and choice of the treatment method.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, S. D., AŞKAN, G., ÖZTÜRK, Ç., OKCU, O., ŞEN, B., BEDİR, R. (2023). Nucleolus Scoring May Increase the Objectivity of Pathological Evaluation of Endometrial Cancers. Medical Records, Cilt: 5 Sayı: Supplement (1) - Innovations in Medicine and Healthcare in the 100th Year of the Republic, 53–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/969520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Hveem TS, Njølstad TS, Nielsen B, et al. Changes in chromatin structure in curettage specimens identifies high-risk patients in endometrial cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:61-7.
  2. Lin Q, Ma X, Hu S, et al. Overexpression of nucleolusn is a potential prognostic marker in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:1955-65.
  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:145-64.
  4. Toptaş T, Peştereli E, Bozkurt S, S. et al. Relationships of nuclear, architectural and international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics grading systems in endometrial cancer. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018;19:17-22. Shepherd JH. Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 889-92. Erratum in: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:440. Clarke BA, Gilks CB. Endometrial carcinoma: controversies in histopathological assessment of grade and tumour cell type. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63:410-5.
  5. Khatib G, Gulec UK, Guzel AB, et al. Prognosis trend of grade 2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: toward grade 1 or 3?. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020;26:2351-6.
  6. Zaino RJ, Silverberg SG, Norris HJ et al. The prognostic value of nuclear versus architectural grading in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13:29-36.
  7. Zaino RJ, Kurman RJ, Diana KL, et al. The utility of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics histologic grading of endometrial adenocarcinoma using a defined nuclear grading system. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1995;75:81-6.
  8. Alkushi A, Abdul-Rahman ZH, Lim P. et al Description of a novel system for grading of endometrial carcinoma and comparison with existing grading systems. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:295-304.
  9. Pich A, Chiusa L, Margaria E. Prognostic relevance of agnors in tumor pathology. Micron. 2000;31:133-41.
  10. Elsharawy KA, Toss MS, Raafat S, et al. Prognostic significance of nucleolar assessment in invasive breast cancer. Histopathology. 2020;76:671-84.
  11. Helpap B, Knüpffer J, Essmann S. Nucleolar grading of renal cancer. Correlation of frequency and localization of nucleolus to histologic and cytologic grading and stage of renal cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 1990;3:671-8.
  12. Matias-Guiu X, Oliva E, McCluggage WG, et al. Tumours of the uterine corpus. In WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Female genital tumours. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020 5th ed.; vol