Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 32 Sayı: 4 - 2022, 32:4

Morphometric assessment of sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study

Pages
261–265
Publication Date
2022-10-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Anatomy, CBCT, morphometric, sphenoid sinus, spheonid sinus ostium

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sizes of the sphenoid sinuses ostia, the distance between them, and the distance between the lateral margin of the sphenoid sinuses ostia and the anterolateral wall of the sinuses in the Turkish population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The analysis was performed as a retrospective study of 240 cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients using NNT Viewer software program (CeflaGroup, Verona, Italy).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Anatomy, CBCT, morphometric, sphenoid sinus, spheonid sinus ostium
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anatomy · CBCT · morphometric

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sizes of the sphenoid sinuses ostia, the distance between them, and the distance between the lateral margin of the sphenoid sinuses ostia and the anterolateral wall of the sinuses in the Turkish population. Methods: The analysis was performed as a retrospective study of 240 cone-beam computed tomography scans of patients using NNT Viewer software program (CeflaGroup, Verona, Italy). Patients over 18 years old with no pathologies present in the sphenoid sinuses were included in the study. Patients who had suffered from head trauma or undergone nasal, orbital, or cranial basis surgery were excluded from the study. Results: The mean size of both sphenoid sinuses ostia was 2.18 ± 0.42 mm for females and 2.26 ±0.53 mm for males. The mean distance between both sphenoid sinuses ostia was 6.19 ± 2.10 mm for females and 6.87 ± 2.10 mm for males. The mean distance between the lateral margin of the sphenoid sinuses ostia and the anterolateral wall of the sinuses was 9.66 ± 2.06 mm for females and 10.61 ± 1.95 mm for males. There was no statistically significant difference between the right and left ostium sizes of males and females. Right ostium diameters of cases over 45 years of age were statistically significantly higher than those under 45 years of age. Conclusion: Intraoperative identification of sphenoid sinus ostium is difficult, and its inadequate excision could lead to potential iatrogenic complications. Therefore, detailed morphometric measurements in populations are needed to perform safe and effective procedures. Keywords: Anatomy, CBCT, morphometric, sphenoid sinus, spheonid sinus ostium

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUMUŞ, Ö., YURDABAKAN, Z. Z. (2022). Morphometric assessment of sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 4 - 2022, 32:4, 261–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/968578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Wang J, Bidari S, Inoue K, Yang H, Rhoton A Jr. Extensions of the sphenoid sinus: A new classification. Neurosurgery. 2010
  2. 66(4):797-816. [CrossRef] 2. Tan HKK, Ong YK, Teo MSK, Fook-Chong SMC. The development of sphenoid sinus in Asian children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003
  3. 67(12):1295-1302. [CrossRef] 3. Hamid O, El Fiky L, Hassan O, Kotb A, El Fiky S. Anatomic variations of the sphenoid sinus and their impact on trans-sphenoid pituitary surgery. Skull Base. 2008
  4. 18(1):9-15. [CrossRef] 4. ELKammash TH, Enaba MM, Awadalla AM. Variability in sphenoid sinus pneumatization and its impact upon reduction of complications following sellar region surgeries. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2014
  5. 45(3):705-714. [CrossRef] 5. Anusha B, Baharudin A, Philip R, Harvinder S, Shaffie BM. Anatomical variations of the sphenoid sinus and its adjacent structures: A review of existing literature. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014
  6. 36(5):419-427. [CrossRef] 6. Yilmaz N, Köse E, Dedeoğlu N, Colak C, Ozbag D, Durak MA. Detailed anatomical analysis of the sphenoid sinus and sphenoid sinus ostium by cone-beam computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg. 2016
  7. 27(6):e549-e552. [CrossRef] 7. Göçmez C, Göya C, Hamidi C, Teke M, Hattapoğlu S, Kamaşak K. Evaluation of the surgical anatomy of sphenoid ostium with 3D computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014
  8. 36(8):783-788. [CrossRef] 8. Kieff DA, Busaba N. Treatment of isolated sphenoid sinus inflammatory disease by endoscopic sphenoidotomy without ethmoidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002
  9. 112(12):2186-2188. [CrossRef] 9. Kim HU, Kim SS, Kang SS, Chung IH, Lee JG, Yoon JH. Surgical anatomy of the natural ostium of the sphenoid sinus. Laryngoscope. 2001
  10. 111(9):1599-1602. [CrossRef] 10. Babbel RW, Harnsberger HR. A contemporary look at the imaging issues of sinusitis-sinonasal anatomy, physiology, and computedtomography techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1991
  11. 12(6):526-540. 11. Zinreich SJ. Functional anatomy and computed tomography imaging of the paranasal sinuses. Am J Med Sci. 1998
  12. 316(1):2-12. [CrossRef] 12. Scuderi AJ, Harnsberger HR, Boyer RS. Pneumatization of the paranasal sinuses-normal features of importance to the accurateinterpretation of CT-scans and MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993
  13. 160(5):1101-1104. [CrossRef] 13. Štoković N, Trkulja V, Dumić-Čule I, et al. Sphenoid sinus types, dimensions and relationship with surrounding structures. Ann Anat. 2016
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Wang SS, Zhang JC, Xue L, Wei L, Xi Z, Wang R. Anatomy and