Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF COUNTRY IMAGE: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH

Onur İzmir(GÜMÜŞHANE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3307-9344
Elif Eroglu-hall(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9086-0132
Nurdan Sevim(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2658-4943
Pages
160–194
Publication Date
2023-07-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future studies with an intention to measure country image with its cognitive and affective aspects can benefit the findings of this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although country of origin studies go back to 1960’s, there is still no consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of country image.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study intents to provide a more accurate conceptual framework for the country image construct and provide some insights into the measurement of this concept for future studies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future studies with an intention to measure country image with its cognitive and affective aspects can benefit the findings of this study.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Country Image · Qualitative Approach · Conceptual Study

Abstract

Although country of origin studies go back to 1960’s, there is still no consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of country image. Country image has been studied from a cognitive dominant perspective and most of the scales measuring this construct has failed to capture affective aspects of it. This study intents to provide a more accurate conceptual framework for the country image construct and provide some insights into the measurement of this concept for future studies. In this study, it is identified that country image consists of cognitive and affective elements in which fifteen sub-dimensions of this concept have been reached. It is determined that cognitive oriented development of the literature causes a major threat to the validity of the studies because studies have mostly applied cognitive dominant perspectives/scales and attributed the results to general country image. As a result of this study, new definition of country image is proposed, and it is thought that this concept has been placed on a more concrete and valid theoretical ground. As a result of the content analysis of the qualitative data and literature review, an item pool composed of 85 items were proposed. Future studies with an intention to measure country image with its cognitive and affective aspects can benefit the findings of this study.

🔖

Cite This Article

İzmir, O., Eroglu-hall, E., Sevim, N. (2023). THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF COUNTRY IMAGE: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 160–194. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1259644

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bilkey, W. J. and Nes, E. (1982) “Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluations”, Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 89-100.
  2. Brijs, K. (2007) “Unravelling Country-of-Origin: Semiotics As A Theoretical Basis For A Meaning Centred Approach Towards Country-of-Origin Effects”, Doctoral Thesis.
  3. Buhmann, A. and Ingenhoff, D. (2015a) “The 4D Model of the Country Image: An Integrative Approach from the Perspective of Communication Management”, International Communication Gazette, 77(1), 102-124.
  4. Buhmann, A. and Ingenhoff, D. (2015b) “Advancing the Country Image Construct from A Public Relations Perspective: From Model to Measurement”, Journal of Communication Management, 19(1), 62-80.
  5. Buhmann, A. (2016) “Measuring Country Image”, Fribourg: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
  6. Chattalas, M., Kramer, T. and Takada, H. (2008) “The Impact of National Stereotypes on the Country of Origin Effect: A Conceptual Framework”, International Marketing Review, 25(1), 54-74.
  7. Creswell, J.W. (2012) “Educational Research, Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research”, 4th Edition, Boston, Pearson.
  8. Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T. and Glick, P. (2007) “The BIAS Map: Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631. Dichter, E. (1962) “The World Customer”, Harvard Business Review, 40 (4), 113-122.