This situation prevents local organizations, especially those located at the lower rungs of the supply chain, from capturing the positive effects of vertical FDI spillovers.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate how the awareness, motivation, and capacity of local organizations affect vertical FDI spillovers in the Turkish automotive industry within the framework of institutional theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A multiple case study method was used in this study, in which interviews, observations, and documents of seven local supplier organizations were subjected to content analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This situation prevents local organizations, especially those located at the lower rungs of the supply chain, from capturing the positive effects of vertical FDI spillovers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:FDI Spillovers · Turkish Automotive Industry · Innovation
Abstract
This study aims to investigate how the awareness, motivation, and capacity of local organizations affect vertical FDI spillovers in the Turkish automotive industry within the framework of institutional theory. A multiple case study method was used in this study, in which interviews, observations, and documents of seven local supplier organizations were subjected to content analysis. The findings show that the expectations of multinational companies for efficiency in buyer-supplier relationships have limited the awareness, motivation and capacity of local suppliers for internationalization and innovation. This situation prevents local organizations, especially those located at the lower rungs of the supply chain, from capturing the positive effects of vertical FDI spillovers.
Ahmad, B. and Ercek, M. (2018) “Absorptive Capacity and Institutional Theory: A Review and Appraisal of Future Research Agenda”, Journal of Economic & Management Perspectives, 12(2): 5-17.
Aidis, R. (2005), “Institutional Barriers to Small-and Medium-Sized Enterprise Operations in Transition Countries", Small Business Economics, 25(4): 305-317.
Aitken, B. J. and Harssion, A. E. (1999) “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela”, American Economic Review, 89(3): 605.
Alan, H. and Yeloğlu, O. (2013) “Markalaşma ve Yenilikçilik”, Iktisadi Yenilik Dergisi, 1(1): 13-26.
Alfaro, L., Rodríguez-Clare, A., Hanson, G. H. and Bravo-Ortega, C. (2004) “Multinationals and Linkages: an Empirical Investigation [with Comments]”, Economia, 4(2): 113-169.
Allard, G., Martinez, C. A. and Williams, C. (2012) “Political Instability, Pro-Business Market Reforms and Their Impacts on National Systems of Innovation”, Research Policy, 41(3): 638-651.
Andersén, J. (2015) “The absorptive capacity of family firms: How Familiness Affects Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity”, Journal of Family Business Management, 5(1): 73-89.
Andersson, M. and Lööf, H. (2009) “Learning‐By‐Exporting Revisited: The Role of Intensity and Persistence”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111(4): 893-916.
Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S. and Lay, G. (2008) “Organizational Innovation: The Challenge of Measuring non-technical Innovation in Large-scale Surveys”, Technovation, 28(10): 644-657.
Baron, R. A. (2007) “Behavioral and Cognitive Factors in Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the Active Element in New Venture Creation”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1 (1–2): 167–182.