SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

Determining the trend of science education topics in gifted education research with R studio program

Fatih ŞEKER
Pages
207–219
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study provides a perspective for future studies by revealing the gaps and emerging trends of giftedness in science education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to examine the trends and results of studies on giftedness in science education by making bibliometric analyzes through the R program.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 443 scientific studies published between 2000 and 2022 were accessed from Web of Science (WoS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study provides a perspective for future studies by revealing the gaps and emerging trends of giftedness in science education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Attitude towards gifted · Bibliometric · Gifted education

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the trends and results of studies on giftedness in science education by making bibliometric analyzes through the R program. For this purpose, 443 scientific studies published between 2000 and 2022 were accessed from Web of Science (WoS). The data were analyzed under the headings of numerical distribution by year, keyword, active scientific study, active researcher, active journal, active institution and most collaborating country. Result show that the most published scientific study on giftedness in science education was in 2016 and the highest citation rate was in 2003. The most common and central keywords related to giftedness in science education were “learning”, “creativity” and “development”. In addition, the most influential scientific study was “Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades”, the most prolific author was “VanTassel-Baska, J.”, the most influential journal with the highest co-citation network was “Gifted Child Quarterly”, the most influential institution was “National Taiwan Normal University”, and the most collaborative country was “USA”. This study provides a perspective for future studies by revealing the gaps and emerging trends of giftedness in science education.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEKER, F. (2023). Determining the trend of science education topics in gifted education research with R studio program. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 207–219. https://ajindex.com/articles/966368

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Baccassino, F., & Pinnelli, S. (2023). Giftedness and gifted education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1073007. DOI:10.3389/feduc.2022.1073007 Baylarova, S., & Baloğlu, M. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on social-emotional problems in gifted children. Journal of Society, Education and Cultural Research, 2(1), 1-11.
  2. Betts, G. (1986). The autonomous learner for the gifted and talented. In J.S. Renzulli (Ed) System and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp 27-56).
  3. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  4. Bicakci, M., & Baloglu, M. (2021). A biblıometric analysis on personality research of gifted individuals (1957-2020). Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 34, 125-157. DOI: 10.19171/uefad.845218 Demir, E., & Çelik, M. (2020). Bibliometric profile of scientific studies in the field of science curriculum. Journal of Turkish Chemical Society Section C: Chemistry Education (JOTCSC). 5(2), 131-182. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-1644
  5. Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160.
  6. Ertz, M., & Leblanc-Proulx, S. (2018). Sustainability in the collaborative economy: a bibliometricanalysis reveals emerging interest. J. Clean. Prod. 196, 1073e1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.095. Feldhussen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness: conception of giftedness. In R. J. Steinberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds), Conception of Giftedness. New York: Cambridge University press. Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Talent Identification and Development in Education (TIDE). Gifted Education International, 10(1), 10–15. DOI: 10.1177/026142949401000103 Freeman J. (2005). Permission to be gifted. In Sternberg R. J., Davidson J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, second edition (pp. 80–97).
  7. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.
  9. Gürlen, E., Özdiyar, Ö., & Şen, Z. (2019). Social network analysis of academic studies on gifted people. Education and Science, 44(197), 185-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7735
  10. Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1-18. Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and educatio