Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

Environmental Behaviors and Ecological Intelligence of University Students

Pages
93–105
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the research, it can be said that the environmental behavior and ecological intelligence of university students reveal significant relationships and differences with each other and with various variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the environmental behaviors and ecological intelligence levels of university students, to examine the differentiation status of some demographic variables and to evaluate the relationship and effect between variables and measurement tools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While 281 university students were included in the study, "Environmental Behavior Scale (EBS)" and "Adult Ecological Intelligence Scale (EISIFA)" were used to measure the data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the research, it can be said that the environmental behavior and ecological intelligence of university students reveal significant relationships and differences with each other and with various variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:universty students · environment · environmental behavior

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the environmental behaviors and ecological intelligence levels of university students, to examine the differentiation status of some demographic variables and to evaluate the relationship and effect between variables and measurement tools. While 281 university students were included in the study, "Environmental Behavior Scale (EBS)" and "Adult Ecological Intelligence Scale (EISIFA)" were used to measure the data. Descriptive statistics, independent sample T test, one-way analysis of variance ANOVA and Post hoc tests, Pearson Correlation test and regression analysis were used in the analysis of the data. In this study, internal reliability coefficients were determined as .89 for EBS and .83 for EISIFA. It can be said that the participating university students exhibited a high level of EISIFA (4.01 ± 0.54) and a moderate level of EBS (3.45 ± 0.62). It was determined that there were significant differences between the participants' gender, age, perceived income, department, taking lessons about environment, attending a course, seminar or talk on about the environment, efficient use of leisure time, participation in activities using natural resources and EBS and EISIFA. It has been determined that the activities that most done at leisure time do not significantly differentiate EBS and EISIFA. On the other hand, it was determined that there was a moderately positive (r=.472) relationship between EISIFA and EBS. It was determined that EISIFA level was a significant predictor of EBS (F=79.996; p<0.001), and EISIFA predicted 22% of EBS. As a result of the research, it can be said that the environmental behavior and ecological intelligence of university students reveal significant relationships and differences with each other and with various variables.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇARSLAN, F., DURHAN, T. A. (2023). Environmental Behaviors and Ecological Intelligence of University Students. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 93–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/966285

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akkuzu, N. (2016). Towards a profound ecological understanding: Statistical attempts to measure our ecological intelligence. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 6(2), 198-216.
  2. Alpar, R. (2014). Spor, saglik ve egitim bilimlerinden orneklerle uygulamali istatistik ve gecerlik-guvenirlik-spss’de cozumleme adimlari ile birlikte, (3rd ed.). Detay Yayinlari: Ankara, Turkey, 356 Altan, M. Z. (2012). Eğitim, çoklu zekâ kuramı ve çoklu zekâ kuramında onuncu boyut: Ahlâkî zekâ. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 137-144.
  3. Aydin, F., Kaya, H. (2011). Secondary education students' thoughts and behaviours towards environment (Karabuk Sample-Turkey). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 10(2), 248-256.
  4. Bahrudin, M. D. F., Rohmat, D., Setiawan, I. (2018). The school’s policy in developing students ecological intelligence. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 145(1), 12-48.
  5. Baş, G. (2011). Çoklu zekâ kuramında bir adım daha: ekolojik zekâ. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim, 134, 7-10.
  6. Benoot, C., Hannes, K., Bilsen, J. (2016). The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC medical research methodology, 16(1), 1-12.
  7. Çabuk, B., Karacaoğlu C. (2003). Üniversiteli öğrencilerinin çevre duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 36(1), 189-198.
  8. Canbay, H., Edizer, Z. Ç. (2012). Behiç Ak'ın çocuk kitaplarında doğacı zeka. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 83-101.
  9. Ceylan, M. (2019). Doğa etkinliklerine katılan çocukların “doğa” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algılarının incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 38-48
  10. Çimen, O., Yılmaz, M. (2011). Tatlı su ekosistemleri konusundaki temel kavramların üniversite öğrencileri tarafından algılanma düzeyleri. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 44-53.
  11. Deniş, H., Genç, H. (2007). Çevre bilimi dersi alan ve almayan sınıf öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin çevreye ilişkin tutumları ve çevre bilimi dersindeki başarılarının karşılaştırılması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 Sayı: 13, 20 – 26 Erten, S. (2005). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarında çevre dostu davranışların araştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28), 91-100.
  12. Erbasan, Ö. (2018). Öğretmenlerin çevre okuryazarliklarinin bazi değişkenler açisin