Journals / Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering / 2023 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Brain Decoding over the MEG Signals Using Riemannian Approach and Machine Learning

Pages
207–218
Publication Date
2023-08-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, MEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) approaches may also be implemented for Internet of Things (IoT) applications, including biometric authentication, thanks to the specific stimuli of individual’s brainwaves.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Brain decoding is an emerging approach for understanding the face perception mechanism in the human brain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This noninvasive and high spatial/temporal resolution signal is a neurophysiological technique which measures the magnetic fields generated by the neuronal activity of the brain.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, MEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) approaches may also be implemented for Internet of Things (IoT) applications, including biometric authentication, thanks to the specific stimuli of individual’s brainwaves.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Magnetoencephalography · Brain Decoding · Riemannian Approach

Abstract

Brain decoding is an emerging approach for understanding the face perception mechanism in the human brain. Face visual stimuli and perception mechanism are considered as a challenging ongoing research of the neuroscience field. In this study, face/scrambled face visual stimulations were implemented over the sixteen participants to be decoded the face or scrambled face classification using machine learning (ML) algorithms via magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals. This noninvasive and high spatial/temporal resolution signal is a neurophysiological technique which measures the magnetic fields generated by the neuronal activity of the brain. The Riemannian approach was used as a highly promising feature extraction technique. Then Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were employed as deep learning algorithms, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were implemented as shallow algorithms. The improved classification performances are very encouraging, especially for deep learning algorithms. The LSTM and GRU have achieved 92.99% and 91.66% accuracy and 0.977 and 0.973 of the area under the curve (AUC) scores, respectively. Moreover, CNN has yielded 90.62% accuracy. As our best knowledge, the improved outcomes and the usage of the deep learning on the MEG dataset signals from 16 participants are critical to expand the literature of brain decoding after visual stimuli. And this study is the first attempt with these methods in systematic comparison. Moreover, MEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) approaches may also be implemented for Internet of Things (IoT) applications, including biometric authentication, thanks to the specific stimuli of individual’s brainwaves.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, Z., ÇETİN, O., GÖRÜR, K., TEMURTAŞ, F. (2023). Brain Decoding over the MEG Signals Using Riemannian Approach and Machine Learning. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 207–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/965932

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Zarief, C. N., & Hussein, W. (2019). Decoding the Human Brain Activity and Predicting the Visual Stimuli from Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Recordings. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Medicine and Image Processing - IMIP ’19 (pp. 35–42). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.
  2. Lin, J.-F. L., Silva-Pereyra, J., Chou, C.-C., & Lin, F.-H. (2018). The sequence of cortical activity inferred by response latency variability in the human ventral pathway of face processing. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 5836.
  3. Watanabe, S., Miki, K., & Kakigi, R. (2005). Mechanisms of face perception in humans: A magneto- and electro-encephalographic study. Neuropathology, 25(1), 8–20.
  4. Tadel, F., Bock, E., Niso, G., Mosher, J. C., Cousineau, M., Pantazis, D., … Baillet, S. (2019). MEG/EEG Group Analysis With Brainstorm. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13(FEB), 1–21.
  5. Caliskan, A., Yuksel, M. E., Badem, H., & Basturk, A. (2017). A deep neural network classifier for decoding human brain activity based on magnetoencephalography. Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika, 23(2), 63–67.
  6. Özkaya, Ş. N., & Yıldırım, T. (2018). Assessment of Components and Methods Used to Identify Responses and Regions of Brain Related with Face Recognition and Perception. Procedia Computer Science, 131, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.183 7. http://web.mit.edu/kitmitmeg/whatis.html. (n.d.). Retrieved from
  7. Kia, S. M., Vega Pons, S., Weisz, N., & Passerini, A. (2017). Interpretability of Multivariate Brain Maps in Linear Brain Decoding: Definition, and Heuristic Quantification in Multivariate Analysis of MEG Time-Locked Effects. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10.
  8. Cetin, O., & Temurtas, F. (2020). A comparative study on classification of magnetoencephalography signals using probabilistic neural network and multilayer neural network. Soft Computing.
  9. Çetin, O., & Temurtaş, F. (2018). A Study on Brain Computer Interface using Learning Vector Quantization. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 1(2), 1–7
  10. Çetin, O., & Temurtaş, F. (2019). Classification of Magnetoencephalography Signals Regarding Visua