Journals / AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3

Examination of Traffic Accident Survivors’ Experiences: A Glance to the Depth of Life, on the Edge of Death

Trafik Kazazedelerinin Deneyimlerinin İncelenmesi: Ölümün Kıyısında, Yaşamın Derinliğine Bir Bakış

Bilgesu Kaçan-bibican(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6139-0944
Gizem Fındık(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8245-6324
Bahar Öz(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5440-0948
Pages
489–516
Publication Date
2023-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that the participants did not adopt safe driving practices generally; instead, they focused on and changed the behavior that they believed caused the accident.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Every year, 1.1 million traffic accidents occur in Türkiye, resulting in over 6,000 fatalities and 280,000 injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The thematic analysis yielded 4 super-ordinate themes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that the participants did not adopt safe driving practices generally; instead, they focused on and changed the behavior that they believed caused the accident.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:trafik kazası · travma · kaza sonrası değişim

Abstract

Every year, 1.1 million traffic accidents occur in Türkiye, resulting in over 6,000 fatalities and 280,000 injuries. The aim of this study was to examine the traffic accidents that cause such losses and injuries from the perspectives of traffic psychology and accident survivors. Nine individuals who reported being affected by a traffic accident within the previous five years were interviewed. The thematic analysis yielded 4 super-ordinate themes. These were the “pre-accident and during-accident situations”, “the effects of the accident”, “ways of coping with the accident”, and “post-accident changes”. The “pre-accident and during-accident situation” theme consisted of the sub-themes of psychological and physiological state before the accident, emotions at the moment of the accident, and behavior at the time of the accident; the theme of “the effects of the accident” consisted of the sub-themes of the psychological effects of the accident, the physical effects of the accident, and the material effects of the accident; “ways of coping with the accident” consisted of the sub-themes such as self-suggestion, social or professional support, and dealing with various activities; and “post-accident changes” theme consisted of attitude and attribution changes, and behavioral changes sub-themes. According to the findings, the traumatic accident experience overshadowed the pre-accident phase. The accident moment not only affected the survivors traumatically, but also provided growth. It was concluded that the participants did not adopt safe driving practices generally; instead, they focused on and changed the behavior that they believed caused the accident. The themes were evaluated based on the existing literature.

Özet

Türkiye’de yılda 1,1 milyon trafik kazası gerçekleşmekte ve bu kazalarda her yıl 6 binin üzerinde insanımız hayatını kaybederken 280 binin üzerinde insanımız da yaralanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı bu kadar büyük sayıda kayıplara ve yaralanmalara neden olan trafik kazalarını, kaza geçirmiş kişilerinin gözünden trafik psikolojisi bakış açısıyla incelemektir. Son 5 yılda trafik kazası deneyimlemiş ve bundan etkilendiğini belirtmiş 9 katılımcıyla yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Tematik analiz sonucunda 4 üst tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunlar; “kaza öncesi ve kaza anı durum”, “kazanın etkileri”, “kaza ile baş etme yöntemleri”, ve “kaza sonrası değişimler” temalarıdır. “Kaza öncesi ve kaza anı durum” teması kaza öncesi psikolojik ve fizyolojik durum, kaza anı duyguları, kaza anı davranışları alt temalarından; “kazanın etkileri” teması kazanın psikolojik etkileri, kazanın fiziksel etkileri, kazanın maddi etkileri alt temalarından; “kaza ile baş etme yöntemleri” teması kendini telkin, sosyal veya profesyonel destek, çeşitli aktivitelerle uğraşma alt temalarından; “kaza sonrası değişimler” teması tutum ve atıf değişiklikleri, davranış değişiklikleri alt temalarından oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın bulguları değerlendirildiğinde kazanın neden olduğu travmatik deneyimin kaza öncesini gölgede bıraktığı gözlemlenmiştir. Kaza anından sonraki sürecin katılımcıları travmatik olarak etkilediği gibi travma sonrası büyüme de sağladığı bulunmuştur. Bunun yanı sıra katılımcıların genel olarak güvenli sürücülüğü benimsemektense kazalarının nedenini atfettikleri davranışa odaklandıkları ve sadece bu davranışı değiştirdikleri gözlemlenmiştir. Ortaya çıkan temalar alanyazın ışığında değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaçan-bibican, B., Fındık, G., Öz, B. (2023). Examination of Traffic Accident Survivors’ Experiences: A Glance to the Depth of Life, on the Edge of Death. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 489–516. https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.1262910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Abedi, M., Gane, E., Aplin, T., Zerguine, H. ve Johnston, V. (2022). Barriers and facilitators associated with return to work following minor to serious road traffic musculoskeletal injuries: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 32, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09994-3
  2. Bahari, R., Alwi, M. N. M., Jahan, N., Ahmad, M. R. ve Saiboon, I. M. (2016). How do people cope with post traumatic distress after an accident? The role of psychological, social and spiritual coping in Malaysian Muslim patients. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 18(4), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1260615
  3. Bonanno, F. G. (2011). Clinical pathology of the shock syndromes. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, 4(2), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.82211
  4. Braun, V. ve Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Cagnetta, E. ve Cicognani, E. (1999). Surviving a serious traffic accident: Adaptation processes and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(4), 551-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539900400408
  6. Doohan, I., Gyllencreutz, L., Björnstig, U. ve Saveman, B. I. (2018). Survivors’ experiences of consequences and recovery five years after a major bus crash. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32, 1179-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12563
  7. Giummarra, M. J., Dipnall, J. F., Collie, A., Ponsford, J., Ameratunga, S. ve Gabbe, B. J. (2021). An evaluation of the association between fault attribution and healthcare costs and trajectories in the first three years after transport injury. Injury, 52, 3309-3319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.027
  8. Kaplanhan, F. (2021). Trafik kazalarının Türkiye ekonomisine maliyeti üzerine bir inceleme. The Journal of International Civilization Studies, 6(2), 115-140.
  9. Karayolları Trafik Yönetmeliği. (1997, 18 Temmuz). T. C. Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 23053). Erişim adresi:https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=8182&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
  10. Karl, A., Rabe, S., Zöllner, T., Maercker, A. ve Stopa, L. (2009). Negative self-appraisals in treatment-seeking survivors of motor vehicle accidents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.03.001
  11. Kenardy, J., Heron-Delaney, M., Hendrikz, J., Warren, J., Edmed, S. L. ve Brown, E. (2017). Recovery trajectories for long-term health-related quality of life following a road traffic crash injury: Results from the UQ SuPPORT study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 214, 8-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.031
  12. Kovacevic, J., Fotez, I., Miskulin, I., Lesic, D., Miskulin, M., Berlancic, T., … Candrlic, M. (2021). Different patterns of mental health outcomes among road traffic crash survivors: A prospective cohort study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041564
  13. Kovačević, J., Miškulin, M., Matić Ličanin, M., Barać, J., Biuk, D., Palenkić, H., … Miškulin, I. (2020). Quality of life in road traffic accident survivors. Zdravstveno Varstvo, 59(4), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0026
  14. Lucas, J. L. (2003). Drivers’ psychological and physical reactions after motor vehicle accidents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00021-4
  15. Markman, K.D. ve McMullen, M. N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(3), 244-267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0703_04
  16. Nickerson, A., Aderka, I. M., Bryant, R. A. ve Hofmann, S. G. (2013). The role of attribution of trauma responsibility in posttraumatic stress disorder following motor vehicle accidents. Depression and Anxiety, 30, 483-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22006
  17. Pashaei Sabet, F., Norouzi Tabrizi, K., Khankeh, H. R., Saadat, S., Abedi, H. A. ve Bastami, A. (2016a). Experiences of encountering physical trauma caused by traffic accidents: A qualitative study. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly, 1(4), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.18869/nrip.hdq.1.4.187
  18. Pashaei Sabet, F., Norouzi Tabrizi, K., Khankeh, H. R., Saadat, S., Abedi, H. A. ve Bastami, A. (2016b). Road traffic accident victims’ experiences of return to normal life: A qualitative study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 18(4), e29548. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.29548
  19. Pérez-Núñez, R., Pelcastre-Villafuerte, B., Híjar, M., Ávila-Burgos, L. ve Celis, A. (2012). A qualitative approach to the intangible cost of road traffic injuries. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 19(1), 69-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2011.603155
  20. Rajalin, S. ve Summala, H. (1997). What surviving drivers learn from a fatal road accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(3), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00081-4
  21. Samoborec, S., Ruseckaite, R., Ayton, D. ve Evans, S. (2018). Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0198352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198352
  22. Sleet, D. A., Dellinger, A. M. ve Naumann, R. B. (2011). The intersection of road traffic safety and public health. Içinde B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (ss. 457-470). Academic Press.
  23. Smits, E. J., Gane, E. M., Brakenridge, C. L., Andrews, N. E. ve Johnston, V. (2020). Expert consensus and perspectives on recovery following road traffic crashes: A Delphi study. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1855677
  24. Thompson, J., O’Donnell, M., Stafford, L., Nordfjaern, T. ve Berk, M. (2014). Association between attributions of responsibility for motor vehicle crashes, depressive symptoms, and return to work. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(4), 376-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rep0000012
  25. Trafik Kaza İstatistikleri, 2020. (2021, 1 Haziran). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni, 37436. Erişim adresi: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Karayolu-Trafik-Kaza-Istatistikleri-2020-37436
  26. Wang, Y., Wang, J. ve Liu, X. (2012). Posttraumatic growth of injured patients after motor vehicle accidents: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(2), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311410511
  27. Wu, K. K., Leung, P. W. L., Cho, V. W. ve Law, L. S. C. (2016). Posttraumatic growth after motor vehicle crashes. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 23, 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-016-9456-9