Journals / Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

DETERMINING THE MOST POWERFUL FEATURES IN THE DESIGN OF AN AUTOMATIC SLEEP STAGING SYSTEM

Pages
783–800
Publication Date
2023-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In general, the ReliefF feature selection method has performed best, and the Bagged Tree classifier has reached the highest classification accuracy of 67.92% with the use of nonlinear features.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spending too much time on manual sleep staging is tiring and challenging for sleep specialists.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The search for finding an effective automatic sleep staging system has been accelerated in the last few years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In general, the ReliefF feature selection method has performed best, and the Bagged Tree classifier has reached the highest classification accuracy of 67.92% with the use of nonlinear features.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Automatic sleep staging · frequency analysis of EEG signals · sleep signal detection

Abstract

Spending too much time on manual sleep staging is tiring and challenging for sleep specialists. In addition, experience in sleep staging also creates different decisions for sleep experts. The search for finding an effective automatic sleep staging system has been accelerated in the last few years. There are many studies dealing with this problem but very few of them were conducted with real sleep data. Studies have been carried out on mostly processed and cleaned-ready data sets. In addition, there are few studies in which the data distribution in sleep stages is balanced (equal numbers of epochs from each stage are used), and it is seen that the performance of these studies is quite low compared to other studies. When the literature studies are examined, there is a wide range of studies in which many features are extracted, many feature selection methods are used, many classifiers are applied and various combinations of these are available. For this reason, to determine the best-performing features and the most powerful features, 168 features were extracted from the real EEG, EOG, and EMG signals of 124 patients. These features were selected with 7 different feature selection methods, and classification was carried out with 4 classifiers. In general, the ReliefF feature selection method has performed best, and the Bagged Tree classifier has reached the highest classification accuracy of 67.92% with the use of nonlinear features.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZŞEN, S., KOCA, Y., TEZEL, G., ÇEPER, S., KÜÇÇÜKTÜRK, S., VATANSEV, H. (2023). DETERMINING THE MOST POWERFUL FEATURES IN THE DESIGN OF AN AUTOMATIC SLEEP STAGING SYSTEM. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 783–800. https://ajindex.com/articles/964596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Aboalayon, K.A.I., Faezipour, M., Almuhammadi, W.S. & Moslehpour, S., (2016), Sleep Stage Classification Using EEG Signal Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey and New Investigation, Entropy, 18, 272; doi:10.3390/e18090272. Acharya, U.R., Bhat, S., Faust, O., Adeli, H., Chua, E.C., Lim, W.J., & Koh, J.E. (2015). Nonlinear Dynamics Measures for Automated EEG-Based Sleep Stage Detection. European Neurology, 74, 268 - 287. Arslan, R. S., Ulutaş, H., Köksal, A.S., Bakır, M., Çiftçi, B. (2022), “Automated sleep scoring system using multi-channel data and machine learning”, Computers in Biology and Medicine 146, 105653. Azhagusundari, B., & Thanamani, A.S. (2013). Feature Selection based on Information Gain. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075.
  2. Balci, M., Tasdemir, S., Ozmen, G., Golcuk A., (2022), Machine Learning-Based Detection of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Type Using Time and Time-Frequency Features, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 73, 103402. Barbi, M., Chillemi, S., Garbo, A. D., Balocchi, R., Carpeggiani, C., Emdin, M., Michelassi, C. & Santarcangelo, E., (1998), Predictability and nonlinearity of the heart rhythm, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 9 (3), 507-515.
  3. Boostani, R., Karimzadeh, F., & Nami, M. (2017). A comparative review on sleep stage classification methods in patients and healthy individuals. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 140, 77-91.
  4. Bose, R., Pratiher, S., & Chatterjee, S. (2019). Detection of epileptic seizure employing a novel set of features extracted from multifractal spectrum of electroencephalogram signals. IET Signal Process., 13, 157-164.
  5. Breiman, L. (2004). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24, 123-140.
  6. Chaozhen, G., Siyang, L., Fulan, L. & Weichao, X., (2015), Sleep EEG staging based on Hilbert-Huang transform and sample entropy, 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks Chattopadhyay, G. & Chattopadhyay, S., (2014), Study on statistical aspects of monthly sunspot number time series and its long-range correlation through detrended fluctuation analysis, Indian Journal of Physics, 88 (11), 1135-1140. Chi-Square. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/chi-square-test-for-feature-selection-in machine-learning-206b1f0b8223 Chlon, L., Song, A.H., Subramanian, S., Soulat, H., Tauber, C., Ba, D. & Prerau, M., Multitaper Spectral Estimation HDP-HMMs for EEG Sleep Inference, arXiv:1805.07300v1 [stat.ML] 18