Journals / Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Assessment of a new rigid wall permeameter for the slurry like barrier materials: zeolite example

Pages
233–242
Publication Date
2023-10-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that S2 has a higher compression index than S1, without a significant change in swelling index attributed to less than 4% clay contents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Areas vulnerable to catastrophic disasters such as hurricane, landslide and earthquake require ready and sustainable solutions for the post-pollution scenarios.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, this experimental study presents the prelimi- nary findings on one-dimensional consolidation and hydraulic conductivity tests performed on crushed zeolite samples S1 and S2 with fine contents of 33 and 84%, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that S2 has a higher compression index than S1, without a significant change in swelling index attributed to less than 4% clay contents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2 samples
⚙️Variables:zeolite · reactive barrier · permeability

Abstract

Areas vulnerable to catastrophic disasters such as hurricane, landslide and earthquake require ready and sustainable solutions for the post-pollution scenarios. Clinoptilolite type zeolite re- sources of Türkiye can serve economical and sustainable solutions as a quick response. While the studies on compacted zeolite-bentonite mixture at optimum water content for the landfill liners applications or dry zeolite-sand mixtures in permeable reactive barrier (PRB)s are com- mon, the slurry form of zeolite emplacement at subsurface reactive barriers has not received an attention by the researchers. In this context, this experimental study presents the prelimi- nary findings on one-dimensional consolidation and hydraulic conductivity tests performed on crushed zeolite samples S1 and S2 with fine contents of 33 and 84%, respectively. The results indicate that S2 has a higher compression index than S1, without a significant change in swelling index attributed to less than 4% clay contents. A self-designed rigid wall type per- meameter was used to study on reconstituted slurry like materials under the benefit of back pressure saturation without the consolidation during testing that encountered in flexible wall permeameter. Falling head – rising tail water procedure was adopted under the back pressure in between 200 and 700 kN/m2. S2 samples reconstituted under 25, 50, 100 and 200 kN/m2 show a gradual decrease in kv from 3×10-8 to 2×10-9 m/s. Previous observations on the sample of S1 revealed 8 times higher kv values under the same σv'. Since the fine content of zeolite limits kv, the proposed permeameter will be beneficial to determine the proper grain size dis- tribution of fill materials considering the barrier height and in-situ stress conditions before the environmental studies with leachate.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİKBİLEN, G. (2023). Assessment of a new rigid wall permeameter for the slurry like barrier materials: zeolite example. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 233–242. https://ajindex.com/articles/964538

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Kurihara, O., Tsuchida, T. Takahashi, G. Kang, G., & Murakami, H. (2018). Cesium-adsorption capacity and hydraulic conductivity of sealing geomaterial made with marine clay, bentonite, and zeolite. Soils and Foundations, 58,1173-1186. [CrossRef] Vignola, R., Bagatina, R., D’Auris, A. F., Flego, C., Nalli, M., Ghisletti, D. et al. (2011). Zeolites in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB): One year of field experience in a refinery groundwater—Part 1: The performances. Chemical Engineering Journal, 178, 204–209.
  2. Puls, R. W., Blowes, D. W., & Gillham, R. W. (1999). Long-term performance monitoring for a permeable reactive barrier at the U.S. Coast Guard Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 68 (1–2), 109–124. [CrossRef] DIPTAR. (2017). Deniz dip tarama uygulamalari ve tarama malzemesinin çevresel yönetimi final raporu, Project No: 111G036, TÜBITAK KAMAG 1007 Project, Kocaeli, Turkey. [Turkish]. Cevikbilen, G., Basar, H. M., Karadogan, Ü., Teymur B., Sönmez, D., & Tolun, L. (2020). Assessment of the use of dredged marine materials in sanitary landfills: A case study from the Marmara sea. Waste Management 113, 70-79. [CrossRef] IAEA-TECDOC-1088 (1999). Technical Options for the Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. https://www.pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1088_prn.pdf.
  3. Nakayama, S., Kawase, K., Hardie, S., Yashio, S., Iijima, K., Mckinley, I., et al. (2015). Remediation of contaminated areas in the aftermath of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Overview, analysis and lessons learned. part 1. A report on the “Decontamination Pilot Project”. Japan Atomic Energy Agency. https://jopss.jaea.go.jp/pdfdata/JAEA-Review-2014-051.pdf.
  4. Blowes, D. W., Ptacek, C. J., Benner, S. G., McRae, C. W. T., Bennett, T. A., & Puls, R. W. (2000). Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45(1), 123–137. [CrossRef] Morar, D. L., Aydilek, A. H., Seagren, E. A., & Demirkan, M. M. (2011). leaching of metals from fly ash-amended permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 138(8). [CrossRef] Chen, R., Zhou, L., Wang, W., Cui, D., Hao, D., & Guo, J. (2022). Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of copper-contaminated soil by combining steel slag and a permeable reactive barrier. Applied Sciences, 12, Article 7981. [CrossRef] Gueddouda, M.K., Lamara, M., Abou-bekr, N,. & Taibi, S.