Journals / Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 56 Sayı: 2

IS CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT SUCCESSFUL ENOUGH FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR SHOULDER DISLOCATION?

PRİMER ANTERİOR OMUZ ÇIKIĞINDA KONSERVATİF TEDAVİ YETERİ KADAR BAŞARILI MI?

Pages
80–83
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recurrence is less common in the presence of accompanying fracture at the proximal humerus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the treatment results, recurrence rate and factors affecting the treatment results of patients admitted to the hospital with primary anterior shoulder dislocation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients who applied to our hospital for the first time (primary) anterior shoulder dislocation between January 2016 - January 2020 and were treated conservatively with temporary immobilization after closed reduction were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recurrence is less common in the presence of accompanying fracture at the proximal humerus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:omuz eklemi · omuz çıkığı · eklem instabilitesi

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the treatment results, recurrence rate and factors affecting the treatment results of patients admitted to the hospital with primary anterior shoulder dislocation. Materials and Methods: Patients who applied to our hospital for the first time (primary) anterior shoulder dislocation between January 2016 - January 2020 and were treated conservatively with temporary immobilization after closed reduction were evaluated. Patients with a previous history of dislocation, rheumatological disease or incomplete data were not included in the study. The history of recurrence and in case of recurrence, duration after the first dislocation was also examined. In addition, evaluations of all patients were made with the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS). Results: 43 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 45.23 ± 17.2, and the patient's age ranged from 20 to 76. Thirty-three (76.7%) of the patients were male and 10 (23.3%) were female. The mean follow-up period of the patients was found to be 48.8 ± 12.4 (minimum 31, maximum 86 months). The mean OSIS value of the patients at the last follow-up was 45 ± 3.45. In the follow-up of the patients, recurrence was observed in 21 patients (48.8%). When patients older than 40 years and younger than 40 years of age were compared, recurrence rate were found to be 9/25 (36%) and 12/18 (66.6%), respectively (p=0.094). No recurrent shoulder dislocation was observed in 6 patients with accompanying proximal humerus fractures. Conclusion: After primary anterior shoulder instability, recurrence rate was found to be high in patients treated conservatively with temporary immobilization. Recurrence is less common in the presence of accompanying fracture at the proximal humerus.

Özet

Amaç: Primer anterior omuz çıkığı nedeniyle hastaneye başvuran hastaların tedavi sonuçlarını, tekrar çıkık oranlarını ve tedavi sonuçlarına etki eden faktörleri değerlendirmek Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2016 ve Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında, ilk kez (primer) anterior omuz çıkığı nedeniyle hastanemize başvuran ve kapalı redüksiyon sonrası geçici immobilizasyon yöntemiyle konservatif olarak tedavi edilen hastaların verileri değerlendirildi. Daha önceden çıkık öyküsü olan, romatolojik hastalığı olan veya verileri eksik olan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmedi. Hastaların tekrar çıkık öyküsü olup olmadığı; eğer tekrar çıkık geliştiyse, ilk travmadan ne kadar süre sonra gerçekleştiği bilgileri incelendi. Ayrıca, tüm hastaların fonksiyonel değerlendirmeleri Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 43 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 45,23 ± 17,2 olup hasta yaşları 20-76 arasındaydı. Hastaların 33’ü (%76,7) erkek, 10’u (%23,3) kadındı. Hastaların ortalama takip süresi ise 48,8 ± 12,4 olarak bulundu (En az 31, en çok 86 ay). Hastaların son takipteki ortalama OSIS değeri 45 ± 3,45 olarak bulundu. Hastaların takiplerinde, 21 hastada (%48,8) tekrar omuz çıkığı görüldü. Kırk yaş üstü ve 40 yaş altındaki hastalar karşılaştırıldığında tekrar çıkık oranları sırasıyla, 9/25 (%36) ve 12/18 (%66,6) olarak bulundu (p=0,094). Kırık eşlik eden 6 hastada rekürren omuz çıkığı görülmedi. Sonuç: Primer anterior omuz instabilitesi sonrası, geçici immobilizasyon ile konservatif tedavi edilen hastalarda tekrar çıkık görülme oranları yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Proksimal humerusta eşlik eden kırık varlığında tekrar çıkık daha az görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, T. K., ERDOĞAN, A., AKTEKİN, C. N. (2023). IS CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT SUCCESSFUL ENOUGH FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY ANTERIOR SHOULDER DISLOCATION?. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 56 Sayı: 2, 80–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/963547

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Cutts S, Prempeh M, Drew S. Anterior shoulder dislocation. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2009;91 (1):2-7
  2. Brophy RH, Marx RG. The treatment of traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: nonoperative and surgical treatment. Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery: official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2009;25 (3):298-304
  3. Liavaag S, Svenningsen S, Reikerås O, et al. The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations in Oslo. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2011;21 (6):e334-40
  4. Kavaja L, Lähdeoja T, Malmivaara A, Paavola M. Treatment after traumatic shoulder dislocation: a systematic review with a network meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine. 2018;52 (23):1498-1506
  5. Polyzois I, Dattani R, Gupta R, Levy O, Narvani AA. Traumatic First Time Shoulder Dislocation: Surgery vs Non-Operative Treatment. The archives of bone and joint surgery. 2016;4 (2):104-8
  6. Youm T, Takemoto R, Park BK. Acute management of shoulder dislocations. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014;22 (12):761-71
  7. Bankart ASB. The pathology and treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder-joint. BJS (British Journal of Surgery). 1938;26 (101):23-29
  8. Eren TK, Aktaş E, Kaptan AY, Ayanoğlu T, Ulucaköy C, Kanatlı U. Recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients 40-60 years old. Accompanying injuries and patient outcomes of arthroscopic repair. Journal of orthopaedic science: official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2021;26 (4):584-588
  9. Gill TJ, Micheli LJ, Gebhard F, Binder C. Bankart repair for anterior instability of the shoulder. Long-term outcome. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1997;79 (6):850-7
  10. Wintzell G, Hovelius L, Wikblad L, Saebö M, Larsson S. Arthroscopic lavage speeds reduction in effusion in the glenohumeral joint after primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a controlled randomized ultrasound study. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA. 2000;8 (1):56-60
  11. Sachs RA, Lin D, Stone ML, Paxton E, Kuney M. Can the need for future surgery for acute traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation be predicted? The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2007;89 (8):1665-74
  12. Leland DP, Bernard CD, Keyt LK, et al. An Age-Based Approach to Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Under