Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3

Correlates and Determinants of Involvement in Sweetpotato Production among Farming Households in Niger-Delta Area of Nigeria

Pages
377–388
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Government and other stakeholders should organise intervention (training and workshop) on increasing income from sweet potato production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Information on determinants of involvement in sweetpotato production (SPP) in Niger-Delta Area of Nigeria is scarce.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select 330 respondents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Government and other stakeholders should organise intervention (training and workshop) on increasing income from sweet potato production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rural Farming households · Niger Delta · Constraints to Sweetpotato Production

Abstract

Information on determinants of involvement in sweetpotato production (SPP) in Niger-Delta Area of Nigeria is scarce. Determinants of involvement in SPP among farming households in Niger-Delta Area of Nigeria were therefore assessed. Multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select 330 respondents. Data were collected through structured interview schedule and analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square, Pearson Product Moment Correlation-PPMC and logistic regression. Age and household size of respondents were 42.9±11.9 years and 8.7±5.5 persons, respectively. Most respondents were female (53.3%), while 94.5% had no extension contact. Farming experience and farm size were 21.1±12.9 years and 5.4±5.1 ha, respectively. Employed labour per sweetpotato (SP) production cycle, SP farm size and farming experience were 8±6 persons, 2.6±3.5 ha and 18±12 years, respectively. Income from SP, other crops enterprises and non-crop livelihood activities were N2 637 552.0±3 362 512.0 yearly, N5 283 845.0±6 147 413.0 yearly and N1 733 562.0±2 175 223.0 yearly, respectively. Most respondents (56.4%) produced above one cycle per year. Limited knowledge on processing of SP (x ̅=1.88) was the major constraint to SPP. Above half (51.8%) of the respondents had low involvement in SPP. Gender (x2=6.79), household size (r=0.12), farm size (r=0.19), farming experience (r=0.12) and income from SP (r=0.19) were significantly related to level of involvement in SPP. Government and other stakeholders should organise intervention (training and workshop) on increasing income from sweet potato production.

🔖

Cite This Article

OYIBO, O., ODEBODE, S. O. (2023). Correlates and Determinants of Involvement in Sweetpotato Production among Farming Households in Niger-Delta Area of Nigeria. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3, 377–388. https://ajindex.com/articles/963530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abdulkarim, Y., & Yunana, T. W. (2015). Economic Analysis of Small Scale Sweet Potato Production in Zaria Local Government Area of Kaduna State. American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 1(3), 171-178.
  2. Aboajah F N, Ejechi M E, Viashima, S. S., Adeyongu, S. K., & Muogbo P C. (2018). Sweet Potato Production for Poverty Alleviation in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/3.2.10
  3. Adewumi, M. O., & Adebayo, F. A. (2008). Profitability and Technical Efficiency of Sweet Potato Production in Nigeria. Journal of Rural Development, 31(5). Agwu, A. E. (2000). Diffusion Of Improved Cowpea Production Technologies among Farmers in the North East Savanna Zone of Nigeria. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis in the Department of Agricultural Extension, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Ahmed, I. M., Makama, S. A., Kiresur V. R., and Amina, B. S. (2014). Efficency of Sweet Potato Farmers in Nigeria: Potentials for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 7(1), 1-6.
  4. Akoroda, M. O. (2008). Sweet Potato in West Africa. The Sweet Potato. Loebenstein, G. and Thottappillay G. Eds. BV: Springer science and Business Media. Pp441-468. Alabi, K. M. (2019). Determinants of Household Food Security among Microveg Project Beneficiaries in Nigeria. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis in the Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 1-172.
  5. Bawa, D., Donye, A., & Nuhu, H. (2010). Analysis of İnvolvement of Women in Seed Systems in Borno State, North-East Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 1(6), 1237–1242. https://doi.org/10.5251/ABJNA.2010.1.6.1237.1242 CIP, (2005).
  6. Sweet potato Facts. Retrieved, Aug. 17, 2006, from www.cipotato.org. Eforuoku, F. (2018). Determinants of Dietary Intake among Rural Farming Households in North Western, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis in the Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 1-150.
  7. Egeonu, I. N. (2011). Characterization of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Clones for Different End-Uses. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis in the Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 220. Ezeh, A. N. (2013). Access and Application of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) among Farming Households of South East Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 4(6),