SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3

Effects of Data Augmentation Methods on YOLO v5s: Application of Deep Learning with Pytorch for Individual Cattle Identification

Cafer Tayyar BATİ
Gazel SER
Pages
363–376
Publication Date
2023-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The experimental results show that YOLO v5s has a good potential for automatic cattle identification, but with the use of data augmentation methods, superior performance can be obtained from the model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we investigate the performance of the YOLO v5s (You Only Look Once) model for the identification of individual cattle in a cattle herd.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This negatively affects the performance of the YOLOv5 model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The experimental results show that YOLO v5s has a good potential for automatic cattle identification, but with the use of data augmentation methods, superior performance can be obtained from the model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cattle · Data augmentation · Object detection

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the performance of the YOLO v5s (You Only Look Once) model for the identification of individual cattle in a cattle herd. The model is a popular method for real-time object detection, accuracy, and speed. However, since the videos obtained from the cattle herd consist of free space images, the number of frames in the data is unbalanced. This negatively affects the performance of the YOLOv5 model. First, we investigate the model performance on the unbalanced initial dataset obtained from raw images, then we stabilize the initial dataset using some data augmentation methods and obtain the model performance. Finally, we built the target detection model and achieved excellent model performance with an mAP (mean average precision) of 99.5% on the balanced dataset compared to the model on the unbalanced data (mAP of 95.8%). The experimental results show that YOLO v5s has a good potential for automatic cattle identification, but with the use of data augmentation methods, superior performance can be obtained from the model.

🔖

Cite This Article

BATİ, C. T., SER, G. (2023). Effects of Data Augmentation Methods on YOLO v5s: Application of Deep Learning with Pytorch for Individual Cattle Identification. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3, 363–376. https://ajindex.com/articles/963529

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Altınbilek, H. F., & Kızıl, U. (2022). Identification of Paddy Rice Diseases Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(4), 705-713. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1140911
  2. Andrew W., Greatwood C., Burghardt T. (2017). Visual localisation and individual identification of holstein friesian cattle via deep learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision workshops. pp. 2850-2859.
  3. Andrew, W., Hannuna, S., Campbell, N., & Burghardt, T. (2016). Automatic individual holstein friesian cattle identification via selective local coat pattern matching in RGB-D imagery. Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP, 2016-August, 484–488. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7532404
  4. Bati, C. T., & Ser, G. (2023). SHEEPFEARNET: Sheep fear test behaviors classification approach from video data based on optical flow and convolutional neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 204, 107540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2022.107540
  5. Bocaj, E., Uzunidis, D., Kasnesis, P., & Patrikakis, C. Z. (2020). On the Benefits of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks on Animal Activity Recognition. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies, SST 2020, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/SST49455.2020.9263702
  6. Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2020). YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10934v1
  7. Chen, Z., Wu, R., Lin, Y., Li, C., Chen, S., Yuan, Z., Chen, S., & Zou, X. (2022). Plant Disease Recognition Model Based on Improved YOLOv5. Agronomy 2022, Vol. 12, Page 365, 12(2), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY12020365
  8. Dac H.H., Gonzalez Viejo C., Lipovetzky N., Tongson E., Dunshea F. R., Fuentes S. (2022). Livestock Identification Using Deep Learning for Traceability. Sens. 22(21): 8256. de Lima Weber, F., de Moraes Weber, V. A., de Moraes, P. H., Matsubara, E. T., Paiva, D. M. B., de Nadai Bonin Gomes, M., de Oliveira, L. O. F., de Medeiros, S. R., & Cagnin, M. I. (2023). Counting cattle in UAV images using convolutional neural network. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 29, 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSASE.2022.100900
  9. Egi, Y., Hajyzadeh, M., & Eyceyurt, E. (2022). Drone-Computer Communication Based Tomato Generative Organ Counting Model Using YOLO V5 and Deep-Sort. Agriculture (Switzerland), 12(9), 1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRICULTURE12091290/S1 H