SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

Analyzing the Reasons and Habits of Generation Z for Producing Brands Related Content

Z Kuşağının Markalarla İlgili İçerik Üretme Nedenlerine ve Alışkanlıklarına Yönelik Analiz

Ayşe Sarıtaş(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SANAT VE TASARIM FAKÜLTESİ, GÖRSEL İLETİŞİM TASARIMI BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-3950-8744
Mesude Canan Ozturk(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İLETİŞİM BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-2677-6902
Pages
771–794
Publication Date
2023-09-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion ego affects active user generated content behaviour and there is no relationship between ego and passive user generated content behaviour.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, the concept of brands releated user generated concent has attracted the attention of both practitioners and the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is put forth to effect of user motivations on user generated content behaviour.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion ego affects active user generated content behaviour and there is no relationship between ego and passive user generated content behaviour.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka İletişimi · Z Kuşağı · Kullanıcı Türevli İçerik

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of brands releated user generated concent has attracted the attention of both practitioners and the literature. Brands want to encourage the consumers to producer positive content about themselves. The aim of this study is put forth to effect of user motivations on user generated content behaviour. In other words, an answer will be sought to the question of which content Z generation produces for brands with which motivations. A conceptual model has been proposed and has used structural equalty modeling for testing hypotheses of study. In conclusion ego affects active user generated content behaviour and there is no relationship between ego and passive user generated content behaviour. While there is no relationship between co-creation and incentive and active user generated content behaviour, co-ceration and incentive affects passive user generated content behaviour. Finally, brand loyalty affects positively both active and passive user generated content. This study is important because it contributes to the conceptualization of the subject. It also contributes to the literature by developing a Turkish scale about the motivations and behaviors of brands related user generated content.

Özet

Son yıllarda markalarla ilgili kullanıcı türevli içerik kavramı hem uygulamacıların hem de literatürün dikkatini çekmektedir. Markalar tüketicileri kendileri hakkında olumlu içerik üretmeye teşvik etmek istemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Z kuşağı tüketicileri özelinde motivasyonların içerik üretme davranışına etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Yani Z kuşağı hangi motivasyonlarla markalar için hangi içerikleri üretiyor? sorusuna cevap aranmıştır. Çalışmada kavramsal bir model önerisinde bulunulmuş ve çalışmanın hipotezlerini test etmek için yapısal eşitlik analizi kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, benlik motivasyonunun aktif içerik üretme davranışını etkilediği buna rağmen pasif içerik üretme davranışıyla ilişkisi olmadığı görülmemektedir. Ortak yaratım ve teşvik motivasyonunun ise aktif içerik üretme davranışıyla ilişkisi yokken pasif içerik üretme davranışını etkilediği ortaya çıkmıştır. Marka sadakati motivasyonu içerik üretme davranışını aktif ve pasif olarak etkilemektedir. Bu çalışma konunun kavramsallaştırılmasında ve markalarla ilgili kullanıcı türevli içerik oluşturma motivasyonları ve davranışlarıyla ilgili Türkçe bir ölçek geliştirmiş olmasıyla literatüre katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sarıtaş, A., Ozturk, M. C. (2023). Analyzing the Reasons and Habits of Generation Z for Producing Brands Related Content. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 771–794. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1283064

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Altuntuğ, N. (2012). Kuşaktan kuşağa tüketim olgusu ve geleceğin tüketici profili. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 203-212. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/151016
  2. Azar, S. L., Machado, J. C., Vacas-De-Carvalho, L. ve Mendes, A. (2016). Motivations to ınteract with brands on facebook–towards a typology of consumer–brand ınteractions. Journal of Brand Management, 23(2), 153-178. doi:10.1057/bm.2016.3
  3. Berthon, P., Pitt, R. L. ve Campbell C. (2008). Ad lb: when customers create the ad. California Management Review, 50(4), 6-30. doi:10.2307/41166454
  4. Blank, G. (2013). Who creates content? stratification and content creation on the internet, information. Communication & Society, 16(4), 590-612. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777758
  5. Bloemer, J., De Ruyter, K. O. ve Wetzels, M. (1999). Linking perceived service quality and service loyalty: a multi-dimensional perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1082-1106. doi: 10.1108/03090569910292285
  6. Bowman, D. ve Narayandas, D. (2001). Managing customer-initiated contacts with manufacturers: the impact on share of category requirements and word-of-mouth behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 281-297. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1558524?seq=2
  7. Bronner, F. ve De Hoog, R. (2010). Vacationers and ewom: who posts, and why, where and what. Journal of Travel Research, 50(1), 15-26. doi: 10.1177/0047287509355324
  8. Bumgarner, B. A. (2007). You have been poked: exploring the uses and gratifications of facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12(11). doi: 10.5210/fm.v12i11.2026
  9. Buzeta, C., Pelsmacker, P. D. ve Dens, N. (2020). Motivations to use different social media types and their ımpact on consumers' online brand-related activities (cobras). Journal of Interactive Marketing, 52, 79-98. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.004
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133-151. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/256394
  11. Cheong, H. J. ve Morrison, M. A. (2013). Consumers’ reliance on product ınformation and recommendations found in ugc. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 38-49. doi:10.1080/15252019.2008.10722141
  12. Choi, B. ve Choi, B. J. (2014). The effects of perceived service recovery justice on customer affection, loyalty, and word-of-mouth. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 108-131. doi:10.1108/EJM-06-2011-0299
  13. Chrıstodoulıdes, G., Jevons, C. ve Bonhomme, J. (2012). Memo to marketers: quantitative evidence for change how user-generated content really affects brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 53-65. doi:10.2501/JAR-52-1-053-064
  14. Çalışkan, S. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medyada içerik üretimi üzerine bir çalışma. Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 2(4), 31-54. doi: 10.33723/rs.509808
  15. Daugherthy, T., Eastin, M. S. ve Bright, L. (2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Adversiting, 8(2), 16-25. doi:10.1080/15252019.2008.10722139
  16. De Matos, C.A. ve Vargas Rossi, C.A. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 578-596. doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0121-1
  17. Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. ve Pearo, L. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
  18. Ding, Y., Phang, C. W., Lu, X., Tan, C.-H. ve Sutanto, J. (2014). The role of marketer- and user-generated content in sustaining the growth of a social media brand community, 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, (s. 1785-1792). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.226.
  19. Gallegos, J. A. (2017, 12 Aralık). 9 things we learned from the 2018 user generated content report study. Erişim adresi: Https://Www.Tintup.Com/Blog/9-Things-Learned-2018-Usergenerated-Content-Report
  20. Gao, Q. ve Feng, C. (2016). Branding with social media: user gratifications, usage patterns and brand message content strategies. Computer in Human Behaviour, 63, 868-890. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.022
  21. Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Liu-Thompkins, Y. ve Wiertz, C. (2013). Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 242- 256. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.004
  22. Geurin, A. ve Burch, L. M. (2016). User-generated branding via social media: an examination of six running brands. Sport Management Review, 20, 273–284. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2016.09.001
  23. Hennıg-Thurau, T., Gwınner, K. P., Walsh, G. ve Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion 187 platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52. doi:10.1002/dir.10073
  24. Hood, B. (2012). Benlik Yanılsaması. E. Özdemir (Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  25. Huang, N., Burtch, G., Gu, B., Hong, Y., Liang, C., Wang, K., Fu, D. ve Yang, B. (2018). Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: evidence from randomized field experiment. Management Science, Articles Inadvance, 65(1), 327-345. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2971783
  26. Kim, A. J. ve Johnson, K.P. (2016). Power of consumers using social media: examining the influences of brand-related user-generated content on facebook. Computers In Human Behavior, 58, 98-108. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.047
  27. Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H. ve Setiawan, I. (2017). Pazarlama 4.0. N. Özata (Çev.). İstanbul: Optimist Yayın.
  28. Kuran, E. (2019). Z kuşağını anlamak. İstanbul: Mundi Yayınları.
  29. Lenhart, Duggan, M. A., Lampe, C. ve Ellison, N. B. (2015, 16 Temmuz). Parents and social media. Erişim adresi: Http://Www.Pewinternet.Org/2015/07/16/Parents-And-Social-Media/
  30. Liu, X., Burns, A. C. ve Hou, Y. (2017). An investigation of brand-related user-generated content on Twitter. Journal of Advertising, Special Section: Big Data in Advertising, 46(2), 236-247. doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273
  31. Liu-Thompkins, Y., Maslowska, E., Renc, Y. ve Kim, H. (2020). Creating, metavoicing, and propagating: a road map for understanding user roles in computational advertising. Journal of Advertising, 49(4), 394-410. doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1795758
  32. Lu,W. ve Stepchenkova, S. (2015). User-generated content as a research mode in tourism and hospitality applications: topics, methods, and software. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 24, 119-154. doi:10.1080/19368623.2014.907758
  33. Matikainen, J. (2015). Motivations for content generation in social media participations. Journal of Audience &Reception Studies, 12(1), 41-58. Erişim adresi: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/232990/4.pdf?sequence=1
  34. Muniz, A. M. ve T. O’guinn. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432. doi:10.1086/319618
  35. Nardi, B.A., Schiano, D.J., Gumbrecht, M. ve Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 41-46. doi:10.1145/1035134.1035163
  36. OECD (2007). Participative web: user-generated content. doi:10.1787/9789264037472-en
  37. Özdamar, K. (2017). Ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi.
  38. Öztürk, M. C. (2015). Sosyal medya ve kurumsal iletişim. M. C. Öztürk (Ed.), Dijital iletişim ve yeni medya içinde (s. 120-53). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  39. Papacharissi, Z. (2007). Audience as media producers: content analysis of 260 blogs. M. Tremayne (Ed.), Blogging, citizenship and the future of media içinde (s. 21-38). New York: Routledge.
  40. Papacharissi, Z. ve Rubin, A.M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
  41. Piehler, R.; Schade, M.; Kleine-Kalmer, B. ve Burmann, C. (2019). Consumers' online brand-related activities (cobras) on sns brand pages. European Journal of Marketing, 53(9), 1833-1853. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0722
  42. Poch, R. ve Martin, B. (2014). Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on user-generated content. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(4), 305-317. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2014.926966
  43. Prensky, M. (2001). Dijital natives, digital immigrants. Mcb University Press, 9(5), 1-6. Erişim adresi: https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigran ts%20-%20Part1.pdf
  44. Prosumer Report (2018). Erişim adresi: http://www.prosumer-report.com/blog/category/digital-and-the-new-consumer
  45. Puiu, S. (2017). Generation z-an educational and managerial perspective. Revista Tinerilor Economişti, 14(29), 62-72. Erişim adresi: https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=779c2a68-fc72-4630-8f2d-28118e73f369%40redis
  46. Sabermajidi, N., Valaei, N., Balaji, M.S. ve Goh, S. K. (2020). Measuring brand-related content in social media: a socialization theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 33(4), 1281-1302. doi:10.1108/ITP-10-2018-0497
  47. Saridakis, C., Baltas, G., Oghazi, P., ve Hultman, M. (2016). Motivation recipes for brand-related social media use: a boolean-fsqca approach. Psychology & Marketing, 33(12), 1062-1070. doi:10.1002/mar.20940
  48. Schindler, R.M. ve Bickart, B. (2005). Published word of mouth: referable, consumer generated information on the internet. C.P. Haugtvedt, K.A. Machleit ve R.F. Yalch (Ed.), Online consumer psychology; understanding and ınfluencing consumer behavior in the virtual world içinde (s. 35–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  49. Schivinski, B. ve Dabrowski, D. (2016). The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(2), 189-214. doi:10.1080/13527266.2013.871323
  50. Schivinski, B., Christodoulides, G. ve Dabrowski, D. (2016). Measuring consumers' engagement with brand-related social-media content. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(1), 64-80. doi:10.2501/JAR-2016-004
  51. Seçer, İ. (2017). Spss ve lisrell ile pratik veri analizi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  52. Senbir, H. (2004). Z son insan mı? Z kuşağı ve sonrasına dair düşünceler. İstanbul: O Kitaplar.
  53. Shao, G. (2008). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7-25. doi:10.1108/10662240910927795
  54. Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., ve Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: a motivational analysis. Advances In Consumer Research, 25, 527-531. Erişim adresi: https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=041301e5-757c-4cce-8803-ed4ec9fdc4be%40redis
  55. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L.S. (2015. Çok değişkenli istatistiklerin kullanımı. M. Baloğlu (Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  56. Tomaiuolo, N. G. (2012). Ucontent: the ınformation professional’s guide to user-generated content. New Jersey: Information Today.
  57. Tuten, T. L. (2008). Advertising 2.0: social media marketing in a web 2.0 world. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
  58. Uçkan, Ö. (2007). Sosyalleşmenin cazibesi-z kuşağı. Erişim adresi: Http://Www.Ozguruckan.Com/Kategori/Teknoloji/22229/Sosyallesmenincazibesi-Z-Kusagi.
  59. Vale, L. ve Fernandes, T. (2018). Social media and sports: driving fan engagement with football clubs on facebook. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(1), 37-55. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2017.1359655
  60. Wang, X. ve Li, Y. (2014). Trust, psychologıcal need, and motıvatıon to produce usergenerated content: a self-determınatıon perspectıve. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 241-253. Erişim adresi: http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/Paper8.pdf
  61. Williams, S. (2010, 10 Aralık). Welcome to generation z. B&T Magazine. Erişim Adresi: https://taurusmarketing.com.au/welcome-to-generation-z-sharons-article-in-bt/