Journals / Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Canine brucellosis: A bibliometric analysis based on scopus and web of science databases

Pages
89–98
Publication Date
2023-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The themes and sub-themes identified through this study can provide a basis for further investigation and scientific inquiry, thus contributing to the development of new research questions and opportunities for future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Brucellosis is a zoonotic infection that poses a threat to both human and animal health.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of 316 articles published in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases from 1980 to 2022.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The themes and sub-themes identified through this study can provide a basis for further investigation and scientific inquiry, thus contributing to the development of new research questions and opportunities for future studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:bibliometrix · biblioshiny · Brucella canis

Abstract

Brucellosis is a zoonotic infection that poses a threat to both human and animal health. The aim of this study is to investigate the publication trends in research on canine brucellosis and to determine the changes and general characteristics of the disease throughout history using bibliometric analysis. For this reason, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of 316 articles published in the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases from 1980 to 2022. The analysis was performed using the RStudio-Bibliometrix package and the Biblioshiny application. The publications included contributions from a total of 1241 authors. In addition, a total of 804 keywords plus and 398 author keywords were identified. The earliest study among the top 10 most cited articles dates back to 1985, while the most recent one was published in 2011. The majority of the publications were published in the years 2012 (n=17) and 2014 (n=17). The United States of America (USA) (n=55), Brazil (n=40), and Argentina (n=25) were identified as the countries with the highest number of published articles. Notably, Switzerland ranked first in terms of the average number of citations per article category (n=55.50), despite only two publications being attributed to this country. Keid L. (n=15), Lucero N. (n=14), Carmichael L. (n=13), and Kim J. (n=13) emerged as the most prolific contributors. Lucero N. obtained the highest number of total citations (TC=408). In the initial years of publication, the disease was predominantly characterized by keywords such as "brucellosis," "infection," "abortus," and "Brucella canis". However, keywords related to diagnosis and treatment, such as "diagnosis," "serodiagnosis," "vaccine," and "agar gel," gained significance and became increasingly relevant. The themes and sub-themes identified through this study can provide a basis for further investigation and scientific inquiry, thus contributing to the development of new research questions and opportunities for future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, H., KIRALY-AVCI, E., KARAGÜL, M. S., METİNER, K. (2023). Canine brucellosis: A bibliometric analysis based on scopus and web of science databases. Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 89–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/960651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abbas, A. F., Jusoh, A., Mas’od, A., Alsharif, A. H., & Ali, J. (2022). Bibliometrix analysis of information sharing in social media. Cogent Business & Management, 9 (1), 2016556. Ali, J., Jusoh, A., Idris, N., Airij, A. G., & Chandio, R. (2022). Wearable devices in healthcare services. bibliometrix analysis by using R package. international Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 18(8). 61-86.
  2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  3. Bakri, F. G., AlQadiri, H. M., & Adwan, M. H. (2018). The highest cited papers in brucellosis: Identification using two databases and review of the papers’ major findings. BioMed Research International, 1–10.
  4. Carmichael, L. E. (1966). Abortion in 200 beagles. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 149, 1126. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011a). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166.
  5. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011b). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402.
  6. Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics, 108(2), 595–611.
  7. Daly, R., Willis, K. C., Wood, J., Brown, K., Brown, D., Beguin-Strong, T., Smith, R., & Ruesch, H. (2020). Seroprevalence of Brucella canis in dogs rescued from South Dakota Indian reservations, 2015–2019. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 184, 105157. Dastani, M., Mardaneh, J., & Moshari, J. (2022). Mapping the scientific structure of Iranian brucellosis researches using the co-authorship and co-occurrence network analysis. Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 16(4), 336-339.
  8. Derviş, H. (2020). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156–160.
  9. Ekundayo, T. C., & Okoh, A. I. (2018). A global bibliometric analysis of plesiomonas-related research (1990 – 2017). PloS one, 13(11), e0207655. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3)