Journals / International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

MALICIOUS UAVS CLASSIFICATION USING VARIOUS CNN ARCHITECTURES FEATURES AND MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS

Pages
277–285
Publication Date
2023-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The models proposed in the study will be integrated into various systems and used in the field of aviation to detect malicious UAVs and take necessary precautions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aircraft are used in many fields such as engineering, logistics, transportation and disaster management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has become a necessity to eliminate this problem, especially since it poses a significant danger to other aircraft.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The models proposed in the study will be integrated into various systems and used in the field of aviation to detect malicious UAVs and take necessary precautions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Drone · UAV · Aeroplane

Abstract

Aircraft are used in many fields such as engineering, logistics, transportation and disaster management. With the development of drones, aerial vehicles have become more widely used for entertainment purposes. However, in addition to its useful applications, its malicious use is also becoming widespread. It has become a necessity to eliminate this problem, especially since it poses a significant danger to other aircraft. In order to identify the aircraft and solve this problem quickly, in this study, five different aircraft were classified based on images. In the study, a five-class dataset containing aeroplane, bird, drone, helicopter and malicious UAV (Unnamed Aerial Vehicle) images was used. Three different CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) models were employed to extract the images of features. Image features extracted with SqueezeNet, VGG16, VGG19 models were classified with Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (LR) machine learning methods. As a result of the experiments, the most accuracyful result, 92%, was obtained from the classification of the features extracted with the SqueezeNet model with ANN. The models proposed in the study will be integrated into various systems and used in the field of aviation to detect malicious UAVs and take necessary precautions.

🔖

Cite This Article

FEYZİOĞLU, A., TASPINAR, Y. S. (2023). MALICIOUS UAVS CLASSIFICATION USING VARIOUS CNN ARCHITECTURES FEATURES AND MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 277–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/960598

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Shi, X., C. Yang, W. Xie, C. Liang, Z. Shi, and J. Chen, “Anti-drone system with multiple surveillance technologies: Architecture, implementation, and challenges”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol 56, Issue 4, Pages 68-74, 2018
  2. Solodov, A., A. Williams, S. Al Hanaei, and B. Goddard, “Analyzing the threat of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to nuclear facilities”, Security Journal, Vol. 31, Issue 1, Pages 305-324, 2018
  3. Ye, D.H., J. Li, Q. Chen, J. Wachs, and C. Bouman, “Deep learning for moving object detection and tracking from a single camera in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)”, Electronic Imaging, Vol. 2018, Issue 10, Pages 466-1-466-6, 2018
  4. Basak, S., S. Rajendran, S. Pollin, and B. Scheers, “Combined RF-based drone detection and classification”, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, Vol. 8, Issue 1, Pages 111-120, 2021
  5. Mezei, J., V. Fiaska, and A. Molnár, “Drone sound detection”, in 2015 16th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), IEEE, 2015
  6. Drozdowicz, J., M. Wielgo, P. Samczynski, K. Kulpa, J. Krzonkalla, M. Mordzonek, M. Bryl, and Z. Jakielaszek, “35 GHz FMCW drone detection system”, in 2016 17th International Radar Symposium (IRS), IEEE, 2016
  7. Taha, B. and A. Shoufan, “Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: State-of-the-art in research”, IEEE access, Pages 138669-138682, 2019
  8. Lee, D.-H., “CNN-based single object detection and tracking in videos and its application to drone detection”, Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 80, Issue 26, Pages 34237-34248, 2021
  9. Aker, C. and S. Kalkan, “Using deep networks for drone detection”, in 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), IEEE, 2017
  10. Singha, S. and B. Aydin, “Automated Drone Detection Using YOLOv4”, Drones, Vol. 5, Issue 3, Pages 95, 2021
  11. Jia, X., Y. Cao, D. O’Connor, J. Zhu, D.C. Tsang, B. Zou, and D. Hou, “Mapping soil pollution by using drone image recognition and machine learning at an arsenic-contaminated agricultural field”, Environmental Pollution, Issue 270, Pages 116281, 2021
  12. Kim, B.K., H.-S. Kang, and S.-O. Park, “Drone classification using convolutional neural networks with merged Doppler images”, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 1, Pages 38-42, 2016
  13. Mendis, G.J., T. Randeny, J. Wei, and A. Madanayake, “Deep learning based doppler radar for micro UAS detection and classif