Journals / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

ACTIVATION TRIGGERS: RECONCEPTUALIZATION AND REVIEW

Pages
58–68
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that organizational culture fosters the development of fresh perspectives and encourages the integration of external knowledge to maximize the benefits of complementary knowledge sources.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- Businesses depend more on knowledge than other factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since organizational phenomenon is a complex , the issue of absorptive capacity as a strategic and dynamic capability still merits further research consideration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that organizational culture fosters the development of fresh perspectives and encourages the integration of external knowledge to maximize the benefits of complementary knowledge sources.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Absorptive capacity · activation triggers · endogenous and exogenous contingencies

Abstract

Purpose- Businesses depend more on knowledge than other factors. Many academics have described the idea of absorptive capacity as a skill for handling outside knowledge. Since organizational phenomenon is a complex , the issue of absorptive capacity as a strategic and dynamic capability still merits further research consideration. Previous research shows that some of the variables are beyond the firm's control and moderate the effect of knowledge source and experience on absorptive capacity. The intensity of the triggers may have an impact on the firm's investment in absorptive capacity capability. The purpose of this study is to review and identify endogenous and exogenous contingencies that function as activation triggers on absorptive capacity based on the previous literature. Methodology- The theoretical model, hypothesis, and measurement indicators for the study's variables are described in this paper. Findings- The study of previous research shows that learning organization structure, business environment, organizational leadership, learning culture, management review, and competitive strategy play roles as moderator activation triggers in this study. According to the findings, businesses face complex and unpredictable business environment changes, as well as significant knowledge gaps. Decentralized and dynamic structures with participation in decision-making have a moderating effect on the capacity to absorb knowledge and make it easier for businesses to absorb new ideas. The results show that organizational culture fosters the development of fresh perspectives and encourages the integration of external knowledge to maximize the benefits of complementary knowledge sources. Also, the competitive strategy defines the scope and context of perception and learning. Other activation triggers that require more investigation include information technology, stakeholders, professional conduct, and research and development units. Conclusion- Managers can explore a variety of strategic alternatives and forge competitive advantages for their companies by using activation triggers as a group of variables to upgrade existing talents and develop new capabilities of absorptive capacity.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALEHI, N., JAMSHIDI, M. H. M. (2023). ACTIVATION TRIGGERS: RECONCEPTUALIZATION AND REVIEW. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 58–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/959167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akpoviroro, K. S., et al. (2018). Impact of external business environment on organizational performance. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 4(3): 498-505. 16.0415/IJARIIE-8444 Andrawina, L., et al. (2008). Absorptive capacity moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing capability and innovation capability. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2008.4738009
  2. Anseel, F., et al. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1): 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003
  3. Barney (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 Camisón, C. and B. Forés (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7): 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.022
  4. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. and G. Cepeda-Carrión (2008). Why open-mindedness needs time to explore and exploit knowledge. Time & Society, 17(2-3): 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X08093422
  5. Chilton, M. A., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2008). The dimensions of tacit & explicit knowledge: A description and measure. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 4(2), 75-91. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.4018/jkm.2008040106
  6. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397): 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  7. Davenport, T. H. and L. Prusak (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, Mass, Harvard Business School Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/348772.348775
  8. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496169
  9. Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2): 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.023
  10. Fiol, C. M. and M. A. Lyles (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 803-813. https://doi.org/10.2307/258048
  11. Flood, R. L. (1998). Fifth Discipline: Review and Discussion. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(3): 259-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022948013380
  12. Gray, C. (2006). Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation i