Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Aged All-Ceramic Materials

Yaşlandırılmış Tam Seramik Materyallerin Mekanik Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
457–461
Publication Date
2023-08-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

KEYWORDS: Biaxial Flexural Strength, Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic, Monolithic Zirconia

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Our research aimed to compare the biaxial flexural strength of glass ceramic and two different monolithic zirconias after aging, examine the fracture surfaces with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and perform elemental analysis with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:All samples were aged with a thermal cycle of 10000 cycles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:KEYWORDS: Biaxial Flexural Strength, Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic, Monolithic Zirconia
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çift Eksenli Eğilme Dayanımı · Lityum Disilikat Cam-Seramik · Monolitik Zirkonya

Abstract

Background: Our research aimed to compare the biaxial flexural strength of glass ceramic and two different monolithic zirconias after aging, examine the fracture surfaces with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and perform elemental analysis with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Methods: Two types of monolithic CAD/CAM materials (Katana UTML and Prettau Anterior) and a lithium disilicate material (IPS emax Press) were selected for this study. All samples were aged with a thermal cycle of 10000 cycles. The biaxial flexural strength of the disc specimens was determined using the three-ball piston test and a universal testing machine. Biaxial flexural strengths were compared for each group (n = 10). All fractured samples were examined by SEM and elemental analyzes were performed with EDS. Data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc (p<0.05). Results: Prettau Anterior showed a statistically significant difference between the other groups (p<0.05). Following Prettau Anterior (1141.81 MPa), IPS Emax Press (278.86 MPa) and Katana UTML (216.14 MPa) showed biaxial flexural strength, respectively. Conclusion: Compared to the other materials evaluated, Prettau Anterior had much higher biaxial flexural strength. Katana UTML and IPS emax Press show similar strength over the long term. It is seen that the chemical structure of the materials has an effect on the mechanical capacity. KEYWORDS: Biaxial Flexural Strength, Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic, Monolithic Zirconia

Özet

Amaç: Araştırmamız, cam seramik ve iki farklı monolitik zirkonyanın yaşlanma sonrası çift eksenli eğilme dayanımını karşılaştırmayı, taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) ile kırık yüzeylerini incelemeyi ve enerji dağılımlı spektroskopi (EDS) ile element analizi yapmayı amaçladı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma için iki tip monolitik CAD/CAM materyali (Katana UTML ve Prettau Anterior) ve bir lityum disilikat materyali (IPS emax Press) seçilmiştir. Tüm örnekler, 10000 döngülük termal siklus ile yaşlandırıldı. Disk numunelerinin biaksiyal eğilme dayanımı, üç bilyeli piston testi ve evrensel bir test makinesi kullanılarak belirlendi. Her grup için (n = 10), çift eksenli eğilme dayanımları karşılaştırıldı. Tüm kırık numuneler SEM ile incelendi ve EDS ile element analizleri yapıldı. Veriler 1-way ANOVA ve Tukey post hoc ile analiz edildi (p<0.05). Bulgular: Prettau Anterior diğer gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gösterdi (p<0.05). Prettau Anterioru (1141.81) takiben sırasıyla IPS Emax Press (278.86) ve Katana UTML (216.14) çift eksenli eğilme dayanımı gösterdi. Sonuç: Değerlendirilen diğer materyallerle karşılaştırıldığında Prettau Anterior çok daha yüksek çift eksenli eğilme dayanımına sahipti. Katana UTML ve IPS emax Press, uzun dönemde benzer dayanım göstermektedir. Materyallerin kimyasal yapısının, mekanik kapasitesine etkisi olduğu görülmektedir. ANAHTAR KELİMELER: Çift Eksenli Eğilme Dayanımı, Lityum Disilikat Cam-Seramik, Monolitik Zirkonya

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZCİ, T., TUNCDEMİR, A. R. (2023). Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Aged All-Ceramic Materials. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 457–461. https://ajindex.com/articles/958929

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Studart AR, Filser F, Kocker P, Gauckler LJ. Invitro life time of dental ceramics under cyclic loading in water. Biomaterials 2007;28:2695-705
  2. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of loading method on the fracture mechanics of two layered all-ceramic restorative systems. Dent Mater 2007;23:952- 9
  3. Drummond JL, King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater 2000;16:226-33
  4. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Swain MV, Ironside J. Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15(4):339-46
  5. Sundh A, Molin M, Sjögren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dental Materials 2005;21(5):476-82
  6. Moqbel NM, Al-Akhali M, Wille S, Kern M. Influence of aging on biaxial flexural strength and hardness of translucent 3Y-TZP. Materials 2019;13(1)27
  7. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-46
  8. Lughi V, Sergo V, Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: a critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry, Dent. Mater 2010;26:807–20
  9. Garvie RC, Hannink RH, Pascoe RT. Ceramic steel? Nature1975;258 703–4, 10. Chevalier J, Olagnon C, Fantozzi G. Subcritical crack propagation in 3Y-TZP ceramics: static and cyclic fatigue, J. Am. Ceram. Soc 1999;82:3129-38
  10. Haraguchi K, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Oka K, Yoshikawa H. Phase transformation of a zirconia ceramic head after total hip arthroplasty, J. Bone Joint Surg 2001;83:996-1000
  11. Guo X. Property degradation of tetragonal zirconia induced by low-temperature defect reaction with water molecules, Chem. Mater 2004;16:3988–94
  12. Yoshimura M, Noma T, Kawabata K, Somiya S. Role of water on the degradation process of Y-TZP, J. Mater. Sci. Lett 1987;6:465–7
  13. Amaral M, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Souza RO. Low-temperature degradation of a Y-TZP ceramic after surface treatments. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater 2013;101;1387–92
  14. Hannink RH, Kelly PM, Muddle BC. Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc 2000;83:461–87
  15. Flinn BD, de Groot DA, Mancl LA, Raigrodski AJ. Accelerated aging characteristics of three yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline dental materials. J. Prosthet. Dent 2012;108:223–30
  16. Kobayashi K, Kuwajima H, Masaki T. Phase chan