SavedAdd your journal

Journals / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 35

The Water is Rising, Families are Drowning: An Ecocritical Reading of The Wall by John Lanchaster

Ali Yiğit(Kırklareli Üniversitesi)0000-0002-3705-4913
Pages
1351–1364
Publication Date
2023-08-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on problematic family images drawn in the Wall, I propose that the rise of environmental disasters has disruptive and destructive effects on traditional family (nuclear family) structure regardless of geographical location, family bonds and intrafamilial relationships, which makes people more vulnerable to external threats in so far as they are left emotionally and mentally, if not physically, debilitated in a devastated environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Written in a plain and unsophisticated style like numerous other popular novels, the Wall by John Lanchester deals with a series of contemporary global issues including climate change, rising totalitarianism and protracted refugee crisis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Set in a dystopian future, but conscious of the contemporary problems afflicting humanity and environment, the Wall also presents in an interrogant tone scenes of empathy toward refugees or “the Others”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on problematic family images drawn in the Wall, I propose that the rise of environmental disasters has disruptive and destructive effects on traditional family (nuclear family) structure regardless of geographical location, family bonds and intrafamilial relationships, which makes people more vulnerable to external threats in so far as they are left emotionally and mentally, if not physically, debilitated in a devastated environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ecocriticism · the Wall · eco-dystopia

Abstract

Written in a plain and unsophisticated style like numerous other popular novels, the Wall by John Lanchester deals with a series of contemporary global issues including climate change, rising totalitarianism and protracted refugee crisis. Set in a dystopian future, but conscious of the contemporary problems afflicting humanity and environment, the Wall also presents in an interrogant tone scenes of empathy toward refugees or “the Others”. In this essay, referring to the postulations raised in the field of ecocriticism, but particularly to understanding of environmentalism in apocalyptic, postapocalyptic, and dystopian senses, I will attempt to analyze how rising environmental crises and concerns shape the family structure of modern people, and the relationships between children and parents. Based on problematic family images drawn in the Wall, I propose that the rise of environmental disasters has disruptive and destructive effects on traditional family (nuclear family) structure regardless of geographical location, family bonds and intrafamilial relationships, which makes people more vulnerable to external threats in so far as they are left emotionally and mentally, if not physically, debilitated in a devastated environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yiğit, A. (2023). The Water is Rising, Families are Drowning: An Ecocritical Reading of The Wall by John Lanchaster. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 35, 1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1346632

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Adams, J. J. (2011, April 11). Dystopian fiction: An introduction. Tor.Com.https://www.tor.com/2011/04/11/dystopian-fiction-an-introduction/
  2. Allardice, L. (2019, Jan. 11). Interview with John Lanchester. The Guardian.www.theguardian.com/books/2019/jan/11/john-lanchester-interview-the-wall.
  3. Belaïd, F. (2022). How does concrete and cement industry transformation contribute to mitigating climate change challenges? Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 15(200084), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200084.
  4. Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2023, May 5). Nuclear family. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/nuclear-family
  5. Buell, L. (2005). The Future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  6. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Post-apocalyptic. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/post-apocalyptic
  7. Collins, J. J. (2014). The Oxford handbook of aplocalyptic literature. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. De Moor, J. & Marquardt, J. (2023). Deciding whether it’s too late: How climate activists coordinate alternative futures in a postapocalyptic present. Geoforum. 138, 1-9.
  9. Duncan, G. J., Wilkerson, B., & England, P. (2006). Cleaning up Their Act: The Effects of Marriage and Cohabitation on Licit and Illicit Drug Use. Demography, 43(4), 691-710.
  10. Elder R. A. (1949). Traditional and developmental conceptions of fatherhood. Marriage and Family Living, 11(3), 98-100+106.
  11. Friberg, A. 2021. On the need for (con)temporary utopias: Temporal reflections on the climate rhetoric of environmental youth movements. Time & Society, 31(1), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x21998845
  12. Glotferlty, C. (1996). Introduction: Literary studies in an age of environmental crisis. In C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm (Eds.). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. xv- xxxvii). Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.
  13. Houser, H. (2014). Ecosickness in contemporary U.S. fiction: Environment and affect. Columbia University Press.
  14. Kaup, M. (Ed.). (2021). Ecological realisms: Post-apocalyptic fiction and contemporary theory, Great Britain: Edinburgh University Press.
  15. Kipling, R. (1954). Rudyard Kipling’s verse: Definitive edition. New York: Doubleday.
  16. Lanchester, J. (2019). The Wall. London: Faber & Faber. https://www.scribd.com/document/559489822/The-Wall-John-Lanchester#
  17. Lawyer Monthly. (2020, Mar. 27). The Legality of cohabitation around the World. Lawyer Monthly. https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2020/03/the-legality-of-cohabitation- around-the-world/
  18. MacFarlane, R. (2005, Sept. 24). The burning question, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/sep/24/featuresreviews.guardianreview29
  19. Malvestio, M. (2022). Theorizing eco-dystopia: Science fiction, the Anthropocene, and the limits of catastrophic imagery. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes (CPCL), 5(1), 24-38.
  20. Nicol, C. (2007). Brave New World at 75. The New Atlantis, (16), 41-54.
  21. Orwell, G. (2013). 1984. Free Ebooks. https://archive.org/details/Orwell1984preywo/page/n2/ mode/1up?q=marriage (Original work published 1949).
  22. Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Apocalyptic. In Oxford learner’s dictionary. Retrieved July 8,2023, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/apocaly-ptic
  23. Rehding, A. (2011). Ecomusicology between apocalypse and nostalgia. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 64(2), 409-414.
  24. Rowland, A. (1997) "Re-reading 'impossibility' and 'barbarism': Adorno and post-holocaust poetics, 9(1), 57-69.
  25. Rowling, M. (2018, Dec. 3). Young people get tough with older generations over ‘messed-up planet’. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-a accord-youth- idUSKBN1O227E
  26. Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and ecology: An experiment in ecocriticism. In C. Glotfelty and H. Fromm (Eds.). The Ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology (pp. 105-123). Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.
  27. Sandrock, K. (2020). Border temporalities, climate mobility, and Shakespeare in John Lanchester’s The Wall. Journal of Modern Literature 43(3), 163-180. Doi:10.2979/jmodelite.43.3.10.
  28. Steinberg, S. (2002, July 8). An Englishman in Hong Kong. Publisher’s Weekly. www.publishersweekly.com/pw/print/20020708/20700-an-englishman-in-hong-kong.html.
  29. Storrie, S. & Martin, D. A. (2018). Revolutionary from the waist down. In Ezio Di Nucci and Stefan Storrie (Eds.). 1984 and philosophy: Is resistance futile? (pp. 23-33). Chicago: Open Court.
  30. UNHCR, UNICEF and IOM (2018). Refugee and migrant children in Europe. https://www.unicef.org/eca/sites/unicef.org.eca/files/2019 02/Refugee%20and%20migrant%20children%20in%20europe%20jan- jun%202018.pdf
  31. Von Mossner, A. W. (2020). Affect, Emotion, and Ecocriticism. Ecozon@, 11(2), 128-136.