Journals / HRÜ Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği ve Oral Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Roots of Maxillary Anterior Teeth and Neighboring Anatomical Structures in Children: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

Çocuklarda Maksiller Anterior Dişlerin Kökleri ile Komşuluğundaki Anatomik Yapılar Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi: Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Çalışması

Pages
86–90
Publication Date
2023-08-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the mean buccal cortical bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth 11 and 21 with open apex was significantly higher than those with closed apex (p<0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Background: In our study, we aimed to evaluate the distances between the roots of maxillary incisors and the nasopalatine canal and the floor of the nasal cavity, and the buccal cortical bone thickness at the apices of the roots of these teeth by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in children in the permanent dentition period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 49 patients aged 6-14 years were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the mean buccal cortical bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth 11 and 21 with open apex was significantly higher than those with closed apex (p<0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anterior maksilla · konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi · nasopalatin kanal

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: In our study, we aimed to evaluate the distances between the roots of maxillary incisors and the nasopalatine canal and the floor of the nasal cavity, and the buccal cortical bone thickness at the apices of the roots of these teeth by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in children in the permanent dentition period. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 49 patients aged 6-14 years were evaluated. In the sagittal plane, the distances of the apices of the maxillary central teeth with the nasopalatine canal and with the floor of the nasal cavity were evaluated. Buccal cortical bone thickness at the apex of the roots of maxillary anterior teeth was examined. These data were compared in terms of gender and whether the teeth had open or closed apices. Results: When the mean distance of the maxillary central teeth (11,21) to the nasopalatine canal was evaluated in terms of the open/closed apex status of the teeth and gender, there was no significant relationship (p>0.05). Among the maxillary anterior teeth (11, 21,12, 22), the root apex of tooth 22 was the farthest from the floor of the nasal cavity and the root apex of tooth 12 was the closest. It was found that the mean buccal cortical bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth 11 and 21 with open apex was significantly higher than those with closed apex (p<0.05). Conclusions: The relationship of the maxillary anterior teeth with the anatomical structures in this region is important due to the frequent occurrence of traumatic dental injuries such as intrusion or lateral luxation, overflow filling during faulty root canal treatment, and apical surgery or implantation in this region.

Özet

ÖZ Amaç: Çalışmamızda kalıcı dişlenme dönemindeki çocuklarda maksiller keser dişlerin kökleriyle nazopalatin kanal, nazal kavite tabanı arasındaki mesafeyi ve bu dişlerin kök apekslerindeki bukkal kortikal kemik kalınlığını Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografiyle (KIBT) değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 6-14 yaş aralığındaki 49 hastanın KIBT görüntüleri değerlendirilmiştir. KIBT’de sagital düzlemde maksiller santral dişlerin apeksleriyle nazopalatin kanal, maksiller anterior dişlerin apeksleriyle ise nazal kavite tabanı arasındaki mesafe değerlendirilmiştir. Maksiller anterior dişlerin köklerinin apeksindeki bukkal kortikal kemik kalınlığı incelenmiştir. Bu veriler cinsiyet ve dişlerin açık/kapalı apeksli olma durumu açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Maksiller santral dişlerin (11,21) nazopalatin kanala olan ortalama uzaklığı, dişlerin açık/kapalı apeksli olma durumu ve cinsiyet açısından değerlendirildiğinde aralarında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır (p>0.05). Nazal kavite tabanına maksiller anterior dişlerden (11,21,12,22) 22 nolu dişin kök apeksinin en uzak, 12 nolu dişin kök apeksinin ise en yakın olduğu görülmüştür. Maksiller anterior dişlerden 11 ve 21 nolu dişlerin açık apeksli olanlarının kapalı apekslilere göre ortalama bukkal kortikal kemik kalınlığının anlamlı olarak daha fazla olduğu bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Sonuçlar: Maksiller anterior dişlerde, intrüzyon veya lateral lüksasyon gibi travmatik dental yaralanmaların sık görülmesi, hatalı kök kanal tedavisi esnasında taşkın dolgu görülebilmesi, bu bölgeye apikal cerrahi veya implant uygulanması gibi nedenlerden dolayı bu bölgedeki anatomik yapılarla olan ilişkisi önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOZAR, K. N., AKDAĞ, U., KAPLANOĞLU, K. (2023). An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Roots of Maxillary Anterior Teeth and Neighboring Anatomical Structures in Children: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. HRÜ Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği ve Oral Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 86–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/958226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AlAli F, Atieh MA, Hannawi H, Jamal M, Harbi NA, Alsabeeha NHM, Shah M. Anterior Maxillary Labial Bone Thickness on Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Int Dent J. 2023;73(2):219-27
  2. Taschieri S, Weinstein T, Rosano G, Del Fabbro M. Morphological features of the maxillary incisors roots and relationship with neighbouring anatomical structures: possible implications in endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(5):616-23
  3. Todi A, Singh MK, Kayal S, Das G, Chakraborty A. Assessment of insertion force for the placement of cortical implants in various anatomic sites in dried human skulls. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022;26(6):544-51
  4. Schatz JP, Ostini E, Hakeberg M, Kiliaridis S. Large overjet as a risk factor of traumatic dental injuries: a prospective longitudinal study. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):41
  5. Andersson L, Petti S, Day P, Kenny K, Glendor U, Andreasen JO. Classification, Epidemiology and Etiology. In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L, editors. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2019;252–94
  6. Tewari N, Bansal K, Mathur VP. Dental Trauma in Children: A Quick Overview on Management. Indian J Pediatr. 2019 Nov;86(11):1043-1047
  7. Jain NV, Gharatkar AA, Parekh BA, Musani SI, Shah UD. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Anatomical Characteristics and Dimensions of the Nasopalatine Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16(2):197-204
  8. Hermann NV, Lauridsen E, Ahrensburg SS, Gerds TA, Andreasen JO. Periodontal healing complications following extrusive and lateral luxation in the permanent dentition: a longitudinal cohort study. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28(5):394-402
  9. Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Day P, Heithersay G, Trope M, Diangelis AJ, Kenny DJ, Sigurdsson A, Bourguignon C, Flores MT, Hicks ML, Lenzi AR, Malmgren B, Moule AJ, Tsukiboshi M, International Association of Dental Traumatology. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28(2):88-96
  10. Jonaityte EM, Bilvinaite G, Drukteinis S, Torres A. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(12):3441
  11. Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker-Acay M, Çalişkan A, Sakarya G, Soysal N, Cimbar M, Özbek M. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagn In