Journals / Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research / 2023 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Examination of Eighth Grade Students’ Statistical Reasoning Skills Regarding Pie Chart

Pages
63–90
Publication Date
2023-08-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In line with the finding of the study, recommendations for future studies were presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to examine in depth the eighth grade students’ levels of statistical reasoning on the data displayed by pie chart by using “The Middle School Student Statistical Thinking Model”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the findings obtained; in the process of describing data, the statistical reasoning levels of the students differed significantly according to their academic achievement levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In line with the finding of the study, recommendations for future studies were presented.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Statistical reasoning · Statistics education · M3ST Model

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine in depth the eighth grade students’ levels of statistical reasoning on the data displayed by pie chart by using “The Middle School Student Statistical Thinking Model”. The study used the case study design, which is a qualitative research method. The study group consists of three eight-grade students attending a public school in İstanbul, Turkey. The activities developed by the researchers, the clinical interviews based on activities and the researcher notes were used as the data collection tools. According to the findings obtained; in the process of describing data, the statistical reasoning levels of the students differed significantly according to their academic achievement levels. In addition, the sub-process with the lowest reasoning levels of the students is to determine the effectiveness of data display types that representing data. It was determined that the most significant differentiation between the reasoning levels of the students is in the process of analyzing and interpreting data. Students mostly had difficulties in the sub-process of making inferences about a data display. In line with the finding of the study, recommendations for future studies were presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, L., SABAN, P. A. (2023). Examination of Eighth Grade Students’ Statistical Reasoning Skills Regarding Pie Chart. Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 63–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/957725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking, 66, 3-15.
  2. Bursal, M., & Yetiş, S. (2020). Middle school students' graph skills and affective states about graphs. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(4), 692-704.
  3. Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., & Grochowski, J. N. (1999). Making the mean meaningful: An instructional study. Research in Middle Level Education, 22(4), 1-24. doi:10.1080/10848959.1999.11670153 Çakmak, Z. T., & Durmuş, S. (2015). Determining the concepts and subjects in the area of learning statistics and probability that 6-8th grade math students have difficulties. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(2), 27-58.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods. (M. Bütün & S.B. Demir, Trans.). İstanbul:
  5. Siyasal Kitapevi. Chan, S. W., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2016). A framework for assessing high school students' statistical reasoning. Plos one, 11(11), 1-32. doi: 0.1371/journal.pone.0163846 Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010), “Common core state standards for mathematics (CCSSI report)” Available at https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ADA-Compliant-Math-Standards.pdf. delMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and learning: A commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1-11. Doi: 0.1080/10691898.2002.11910674 Diezmann, C. M., Lowrie, T. (2009). The role of fluency in a mathematics item with an embedded graphic: interpreting a pie chart. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 651-662. doi: 0.1007/s11858-009-0212-6 GAISE. College Report ASA Revision Committee. (2016). “Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education college report 2016” Available at http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise.
  6. Gal, I. (2002). Adults' statistical literacy: meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–52. Doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x Gal, I., Rothschild, K., & Wagner, D. A. (1989). Which group is better? the development of statistical reasoning in elementary school children. Paper presented at meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City. Garfield, J.B., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Creating statistical reasoning learning environment. In J.B. Garfield, and D. Ben-Zvi (Ed.), Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teach