Journals / Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of recreation activities in nature parks and tourism potential

Pages
185–192
Publication Date
2023-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most common activities in the nature parks are listed as; hiking, photography, picnic, cycling.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The desire of people to escape from cities to rural areas for various reasons increased the importance of ecotourism in general, nature parks and recreational activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, 33 nature parks located in the Eastern Marmara Region focused in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most common activities in the nature parks are listed as; hiking, photography, picnic, cycling.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:nature park · recreation · ecotourism

Abstract

The desire of people to escape from cities to rural areas for various reasons increased the importance of ecotourism in general, nature parks and recreational activities. In this study, it is aimed to determine the recreational activities in nature parks and to shed light on the tourism potential of nature parks. In this context, 33 nature parks located in the Eastern Marmara Region focused in the study. The focus is on the eastern Marmara region, as it is a region with the potential to attract more tourists due to its close location to large cities with high populations. The distribution of the nature parks by the cities examined and specifically, which recreational activities could be carried out in each nature park determined and conducted a content analysis with the help of secondary data. The intensity of recreational activities mapped according to the cities, and the richness of recreational activities in nature parks compared within itself. Findings obtained from the research shows that among the cities in the Eastern Marmara Region, the most nature parks are located in Bolu. The nature park with the most activities is Harmankaya Canyon in Bilecik with 15 different activities. The most common activities in the nature parks are listed as; hiking, photography, picnic, cycling.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, Z. Y. (2023). Evaluation of recreation activities in nature parks and tourism potential. Journal of multidisciplinary academic tourism, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 185–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/955528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akten, S., & Gül, A. (2014). Korunan doğal alanlarda ziyaretçilerin olası etki düzeyleri önlem ve standartların belirlenmesi (Gölcük Tabiat Parkı örneği). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 130-139.
  2. Akyol, A., & Uygun, A. A. (2017). Sürdürülebilir turizm uygulamaları kapsamında ziyaretçi tercihleri: Pastoral Vadi Ekolojik Yaşam Çiftliği örneği. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 18(2), 133-139.
  3. Aliyeva, Z., Sakypbek, M., Aktymbayeva, A., Assipova, Z., & Saidullayev, S. (2020). Assessment of recreation carrying capacity of Ile-Alatau national park in Kazakhstan. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 29(2), 460-471.
  4. Armaitiene, A., Bertuzyte, R., & Vaskaitis, E. (2014). Conceptual framework for rethinking of nature heritage management and health tourism in national parks. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 148, 330-337.
  5. Batman, Z. P., & Demirel, Ö. (2015). Altındere Vadisi Meryemana Deresi güzergâhında doğa temelli turizm etkinliği: Yamaç paraşütü. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(11), 13-26.
  6. Beşkayalar Tabiat Parkı. (2022). Beşkayalar Tabiat Parkı-Başiskele – Kocaeli. Erişim adresi: https://www. kulturportali.gov.tr /turkiye/kocaeli/gezilecekyer/ beskayalar-tabiat-parki-basiskele Bozok, D., & Kahraman, K. (2015). Kırsal turizmde yöresel yemek kültürünün rolü: Balıkesir. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 5(1), 85-90. Carrascosa-López, C., Carvache-Franco, M., & Carvache-Franco, W. (2021). Perceived value and ıts predictive relationship with satisfaction and loyalty in ecotourism: A Study in the Posets-Maladeta Natural Park in Spain. Sustainability, 13(14), 7860. Çelik, A., & Göçmen, Z. (2013). Yerel yönetim bakış açısıyla etkinlik turizmi motivasyonlarının belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 48(2), 70-89.
  7. Deng, J., King, B., & Bauer, T. (2002). Evaluating natural attractions for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 422-438.
  8. Duglio, S., & Letey, M. (2019). The role of a national park in classifying mountain tourism destinations: An exploratory study of the Italian Western Alps. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(7), 1675-1690.
  9. Erikli Tabiat Parkı. (2020). 1440 rakımlı Erikli Tabiat Parkında doğa yürüyüşü. Retrieved from: http://www.bilecik.gov.tr/1440-rakimli-erikli-tabiat-parkinda-doga-yuruyusu
  10. Erken, K., Atanur, G., & Tanrıöver, A. A. (2019). Bursa florasının doğa turizmi potansiyeli. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 92-101. Geyiklibel K