Journals / İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Girişimcilik Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13

THE INTERTWINED CASE OF AUTHENTICITY AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION FORMATION

Otantik Liderlik ile Sosyal Girişimciliğe İlişkin Niyet Oluşumunun Kavramsal Kesişimi

Çiğdem Asarkaya(İSTANBUL TİCARET ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İŞLETME FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-5661-7996
Pages
108–118
Publication Date
2023-06-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the Constructivist Self Development Theory, it is suggested in this paper that a reason why these people do their best to solve others’ – often similar- problems, may be their increased levels of authenticity throughout their challenging life experiences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Founders of social enterprises become the initiators of their institutions by prioritizing their missions, and dedicating their efforts and time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their goals become real as a result of hard work of a group of people, who unite around their missions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the Constructivist Self Development Theory, it is suggested in this paper that a reason why these people do their best to solve others’ – often similar- problems, may be their increased levels of authenticity throughout their challenging life experiences.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Otantik liderlik · Sosyal girişimcilik · Sosyal girişimcilik niyetinin öncülleri

Abstract

ABSTRACT Founders of social enterprises become the initiators of their institutions by prioritizing their missions, and dedicating their efforts and time. Their goals become real as a result of hard work of a group of people, who unite around their missions. Based on the literature of authenticity and authentic leadership (AL), and social entrepreneurial intention formation; it was realized that there is a high degree of intersection between some of the authenticity concepts and the previously proposed antecedents of social entrepreneurial intention. The purpose of this paper is to conceptually merge the relevant dimensions of AL with a previously suggested social entrepreneurial intention (SEI) model. The strength of SEs is often based on their values, resilience, and personal experiences of solving problems. Based on the Constructivist Self Development Theory, it is suggested in this paper that a reason why these people do their best to solve others’ – often similar- problems, may be their increased levels of authenticity throughout their challenging life experiences.

Özet

Otantiklik ve otantik liderlik literatürünü okuken bu kavramlar ile daha önce önerdiğimiz sosyal girişimcilik niyeti öncüllerimiz arasında kavramsal olarak güçlü bir kesişme olduğunu fark ettim . Bu makalenin amacı, otantik liderliğin ilgili boyutlarını önceki ortak yazarlı sosyal girişimcilik niyeti modelimiz ile birleştirmektir. Sosyal girişimciler, misyonlarını ön planda tutarak, emeklerini ve zamanlarını ayırarak kurumlarını kurarlar. Hedefleri, misyonları etrafında birleşen bir grup insanın sıkı çalışması sonucunda gerçeğe dönüşür. Sosyal girişimcilerin gücü genellikle değerlerine, problem çözme konusundaki kişisel deneyimlerine ve dayanıklılıklarına dayanır. Bu insanların başkalarının - genellikle kendilerininkine benzer olan- sorunlarını çözmek için ellerinden gelenin en iyisini yapmalarının bir nedeninin, hayat tecrübeleri doğrultusunda artan otantiklik seviyeleri olabileceğini düşünüyorum.

🔖

Cite This Article

Asarkaya, Ç. (2023). THE INTERTWINED CASE OF AUTHENTICITY AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION FORMATION. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Girişimcilik Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.55830/tje.1268685

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Asarkaya, C., and Keles Taysir, N. (2019). Founder’s background as a catalyst for social entrepreneurship.
  2. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30, 155-166. DOI: 10.1002/nml.21353
  3. Barendsen, L., and Gardner, H. (2004). Is the social entrepreneur a new type of leader? Leader to Leader, 34, 43–50.
  4. Ertenu Saracer, B., Karacay Aydin, G., Asarkaya, C., and Kabasakal, H. (2012). Linking the Worldly Mindset with an Authentic Leadership Approach: An Exploratory Study in a Middle Eastern Context. In: S. Turnbull, P. Case, G.
  5. Edwards, D. Schedlitzki, and P. Simpson (Eds.), Worldly Leadership: Alternative Wisdoms for a Complex World (206-222). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., and Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
  7. Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., and Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007