SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Some lactobacillus, leuconostoc and acetobacter strains in traditional turkish yoghurt, cheese, kefir samples as a probiotic candidate

Nazan TOKATLI DEMİROK
Mehmet ALPASLAN
Seydi YIKMIŞ
Pages
326–334
Publication Date
2023-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Isolates can be use as natural alternative in infections.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lactic acid bacteria which are important for production of fermented milk products contain may strains called Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus and Leuconostoccus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The probiotic features antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538, Listeria monocytogenes DSM12464, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC51299, and Salmonella Enteritidis ATCC 130762; bile and acid salt tolerance, susceptibility to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, penicillin G, gentamicin, vancomycin, streptomycin, kanamycin, and tetracycline of isolates were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Isolates can be use as natural alternative in infections.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:lactobacillus · leuconostoc · ecetobacter

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria which are important for production of fermented milk products contain may strains called Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus and Leuconostoccus. As a result, lactic acid bacteria are called ‘milk-souring (fermenting)’ organisms. In addition to the fermentation abilities of Lactobacillus spp., it is important for aroma, texture and acid formation and comprises the most important group of lactic acid bacteria. Their critical importance comes from their metabolic capacity and probiotic features. In this research, yogurt, cheese and kefir samples were collected from cities in Turkey and used to isolate. Isolates were identified phenotypically and genotypically characterized. The probiotic features antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC6538, Listeria monocytogenes DSM12464, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC51299, and Salmonella Enteritidis ATCC 130762; bile and acid salt tolerance, susceptibility to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, penicillin G, gentamicin, vancomycin, streptomycin, kanamycin, and tetracycline of isolates were determined. Isolates, were identified as Lactobacillus paracasei subspecies (subsp.) paracasei, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Acetobacter ghanensis, Acetobacter fabarum, Acetobacter subsp., Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides. Some isolates were tolerant of acid and bile salt, some strains were resistant to antibiotics, and some could inhibit pathogens. In this study, isolates were determined to have probiotic features. As a result of the study, it was determined that some isolates showed probiotic properties and had strong antibacterial activity. Isolates can be use as natural alternative in infections.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİROK, N. T., ALPASLAN, M., YIKMIŞ, S. (2023). Some lactobacillus, leuconostoc and acetobacter strains in traditional turkish yoghurt, cheese, kefir samples as a probiotic candidate. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 326–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/952246

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abosereh, N. A., El Ghani, S. A., Gomaa, R. S., & Fouad, M. T. (2016). Molecular Identification of Potential Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Egyptian Traditional Fermented Dairy Products. Biotechnology, 15(1/2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2016.35.43
  2. Akpinar, A., & Yerlikaya, O. (2021). Some potential beneficial properties of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei and Leuconostoc mesenteroides strains originating from raw milk and kefir grains. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 45(12), e15986. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15986
  3. Aldrete-Tapia, A., Escobar-Ramírez, M. C., Tamplin, M. L., & Hernández-Iturriaga, M. (2014). High-throughput sequencing of microbial communities in Poro cheese, an artisanal Mexican cheese. Food microbiology, 44, 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.05.022
  4. Allameh, S. K., Daud, H., Yusoff, F. M., Saad, C. R., & Ideris, A. (2012). Isolation, identification and characterization of Leuconostoc mesenteroides as a new probiotic from intestine of snakehead fish (Channa striatus). Afr J Biotechnol 11:3810–3816. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1871
  5. Arici, M., Bilgin, B., Sagdic, O., & Ozdemir, C. (2004). Some characteristics of Lactobacillus isolates from infant faeces. Food Microbiology, 21(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-0020(03)00044-3
  6. Aswathy, R. G., Ismail, B., John, R. P., & Nampoothiri, K. M. (2008). Evaluation of the probiotic characteristics of newly isolated lactic acid bacteria. Appl Biochem Biotech 151:244–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8183-6
  7. Beasley, S. S., & Saris, P. E. J. (2004). Nisin-producing Lactococcus lactis strains from human milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70: 5051- 5053. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.8.5051-5053.2004
  8. Buttriss, J. (1997). Nutritional properties of fermented milk products. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 50(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.1997.tb01731.x
  9. Chang, J. H., Shim, Y. Y., Cha, S. K., & Chee, K. M. (2010). Probiotic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from kimchi. J. Appl. Microbiol., 109: 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04648.x
  10. Charteris, W. P., Kelly, P. M., Morelli, L., & Collins, J. K. (1998). Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of applied microbiology, 84(5), 759-768. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.