Journals / Academic Platform Journal of Natural Hazards and Disaster Management / 2023 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Seismicity of the Southern Marmara Region (Türkiye) Before and After the August 17, 1999 İzmit Earthquake

Pages
22–33
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since the historical seismicity indicates no large earthquake on the fault segments of the North Anatolian Fault Zone extending along the towns of Geyve, İznik, Gemlik and Bandırma are considered to be most likely faults to host the next destructive earthquakes in the region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study seismicity of the Southern Marmara Region before and after the 1999 İzmit earthquake are analyzed and compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A homogeneous seismicity catalogue that have completeness above the MC=2.9 and covers the time period between 1978 and 2020 is used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since the historical seismicity indicates no large earthquake on the fault segments of the North Anatolian Fault Zone extending along the towns of Geyve, İznik, Gemlik and Bandırma are considered to be most likely faults to host the next destructive earthquakes in the region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:The Northern Anatolian Fault Zone · The Southern Marmara Region · 1999 İzmit earthquake

Abstract

In the present study seismicity of the Southern Marmara Region before and after the 1999 İzmit earthquake are analyzed and compared. A homogeneous seismicity catalogue that have completeness above the MC=2.9 and covers the time period between 1978 and 2020 is used. Comparison of the spatial mapping of the frequency-magnitude distribution before and after the 1999 İzmit earthquake revealed that b-values demonstrate a general increase after the earthquake indicating a general stress decrease in the region. The shortest computed TL value of about 450 years in the east of city of Bursa vanished after the 1999 earthquake. The computed time variations of b-value have shown an increase from 0.8 to 1.6 between 1978 and 1997 and an anomalous increase from 1.1 to 2.1 between 2000 and 2006. After 2006, b-values have decreased from 2.1 to 0.8, implying that decreased stress after the 1999 İzmit earthquake begun to increase after that year. Since the historical seismicity indicates no large earthquake on the fault segments of the North Anatolian Fault Zone extending along the towns of Geyve, İznik, Gemlik and Bandırma are considered to be most likely faults to host the next destructive earthquakes in the region.

🔖

Cite This Article

UTKUCU, M., UZUNCA, F., DURMUŞ, H., KIRIM, S., NALBANT, S. S. (2023). Seismicity of the Southern Marmara Region (Türkiye) Before and After the August 17, 1999 İzmit Earthquake. Academic Platform Journal of Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 22–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/951607

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. A. Barka and K. Kadinsky-Cade, “Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity,” Tectonics, vol. 7, pp. 663-684, 1988.
  2. S. McClusky, S. Balassanian, A. Barka, C. Demir, S. Ergintav, I. Georgiev, O. Gürkan, M. Hamburger, k Hurst, H. Kahle, K. Kastens, M. Nadariya, A. Ouzounis, D. Paradissis, Y. Peter, M. Prilepin, R. Reilinger, I. Sanli, H. Seeger, A. Tealeb, M. N. Toksöz and G. Veis, “GPS constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the Eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 105, pp. 5695-5719, 2000.
  3. A. M. C. Şengör, O. Tüysüz, C. Imren, M. Sakınç, H. Eyidoğan, N. Görür, X. Le Pichon and C. Rangin, “The North Anatolian Fault: A new look,” Annu. Rev. Earth Planet, vol. 33, pp. 37-112, 2005.
  4. Ö. Emre, T. Y. Duman, S. Özalp, H. Elmacı, Ş. Olgun, and F. Şaroğlu, “Active fault map of Turkey with explanatory text,” General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Special Publication Series, 30. Ankara, Turkey, 2013.
  5. T. Armijo, B. Meyer, S. Navarro, G. King and A. Barka, “Asymmetric slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart: a clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault?” Terra Novai, vol. 14, pp. 80-86, 2002.
  6. H. Yalçın, A. Kürçer, M. Utkucu and L. Gülen, “Seismotectonics of the Southern Marmara Region, Nw Turkey,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, vol. 50, pp. 173-181, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.11717
  7. F. Flerit, R. Armijo, G. C. P. King, B. Meyer and A. Barka, “Slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart determined from GPS velocity vectors,” Geophys. J. Int., vol. 154, pp. 1-7, 2003. N. Ambraseys, “The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea Region over the last 2000 years,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., vol. 92, pp. 1-18, 2002. N. Ambraseys, “Earthquakes in the Mediterranean and Middle East: a multidisciplinary study of seismicity up to 1900”
  8. Cambridge University Press., ISBN: 978-0-521-87292-8, 2009. R. Gutenberg, and C. F. Richter, “Frequency of earthquakes in California,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 34, pp. 185-188, 1944. S. Wiemer, and M. Wyss, “Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: an improved technique to calculate recurrence times?” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 102, pp. 15115-15128, 1997.
  9. B.C. Papazachos, G.F. Karakaisis and E.M. Scordilis, “Time dependent seismicity in the continental fracture system” Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata., vol. 55, 3, 617-639. DOI 10.4430/bgta0117, 2014. S. Öztürk, “Characteristics of seismic