Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

Modeling of daily groundwater level using deep learning neural networks

Pages
331–337
Publication Date
2023-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the CNN model with LSTM can simulate time series data effectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Groundwater is an essential water source, becoming more vital due to shortages in available surface water resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data included daily groundwater levels from 2002 to 2021, and the data was divided into 95% for training and 5% for testing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the CNN model with LSTM can simulate time series data effectively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Artificial Intelligence · CNN-biLSTM · Groundwater

Abstract

Groundwater is an essential water source, becoming more vital due to shortages in available surface water resources. Hence, monitoring groundwater levels can show the amount of water available to extract and use for various purposes. However, the groundwater system is naturally complex, and we need models to simulate it. Therefore, we employed a deep learning model called CNN-biLSTM neural networks for modeling groundwater, and the data was obtained from USGS. The data included daily groundwater levels from 2002 to 2021, and the data was divided into 95% for training and 5% for testing. Besides, three deep CNN-biLSTM models were employed using three different algorithms (SGDM, ADAM, and RMSprop(. Also, Bayesian optimization was used to optimize parameters such as the number of biLSTM layers and the number of biLSTM units. The model's performance was based on Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation (r), and the model with SGDM showed the best results compared to other models in this study. Finally, the CNN model with LSTM can simulate time series data effectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

OTHMAN, M. M. (2023). Modeling of daily groundwater level using deep learning neural networks. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 331–337. https://ajindex.com/articles/950913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ao, C., Zeng, W., Wu, L., Qian, L., Srivastava, A. K., & Gaiser, T. (2021). Time-delayed machine learning models for estimating groundwater depth in the Hetao Irrigation District, China. Agricultural Water Management, 255, 107032. Taylor, C. J., & Alley, W. M. (2001). Ground-water-level monitoring and the importance of long-term water-level data (Vol. 1217). Denver, CO, USA: US Geological Survey. Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., & Broda, S. (2020). Groundwater Level Forecasting with Artificial Neural Networks: A Comparison of LSTM, CNN and NARX. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2020, 1-23.
  2. Ebrahimi, S., & Khorram, M. (2021). Variability effect of hydrological regime on river quality pattern and its uncertainties: case study of Zarjoob River in Iran. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 23(5), 1146-1164.
  3. Thangarajan, M. (2007). Groundwater models and their role in assessment and management of groundwater resources and pollution. In groundwater (pp. 189-236).
  4. Springer, Dordrecht. Bear, J., Beljin, M. S., & Ross, R. R. (1992). Fundamentals of groundwater modeling. Ground-water issue (No. PB-92-232354/XAB; EPA-540/S-92/005). Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK (United States). Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab. Anderson, M. P., Woessner, W. W., & Hunt, R. J. (2015). Introduction. Applied Groundwater Modeling, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-091638-5.00001-8
  5. Alasta, M. S., Ali, A. S. A., Ebrahimi, S., Ashiq, M. M., Dheyab, A. S., AlMasri, A., Alqatanani, A., & Khorram, M. Modeling of Local Scour Depth Around Bridge Pier Using FLOW 3D. Prickett, T. A. (1975). Modeling techniques for groundwater evaluation. In Advances in hydroscience (Vol. 10, pp. 1-143).
  6. Elsevier. Faulkner, J., Hu, B. X., Kish, S., & Hua, F. (2009). Laboratory analog and numerical study of groundwater flow and solute transport in a karst aquifer with conduit and matrix domains. Journal of contaminant hydrology, 110(1-2), 34-44.
  7. Gholami, V. C. K. W., Chau, K. W., Fadaee, F., Torkaman, J., & Ghaffari, A. (2015). Modeling of groundwater level fluctuations using dendrochronology in alluvial aquifers. Journal of hydrology, 529, 1060-1069.
  8. Boyraz, U., & Kazezyılmaz-Alhan, C. M. (2018). Solutions for groundwater flow with sloping stream boundary: analytical, numerical and experimental models. Hydrology Research, 49(4), 1120-1130.
  9. Lee, W. D., Yoo, Y. J., Jeong, Y. M., & Hur, D. S. (2019). Experimental and numerical analysis on hydraulic characteristics of coastal aquifers with seawa