Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

A comparative study to estimate the mode I fracture toughness of rocks using several soft computing techniques

Pages
296–305
Publication Date
2023-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the number of samples for different rock types should be increased to improve the established predictive models in future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fracture toughness is an important phenomenon to reveal the actual strength of fractured rock materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is, therefore, crucial to use the fracture toughness models principally for simulating the performance of fractured rock medium.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the number of samples for different rock types should be increased to improve the established predictive models in future studies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mode-I fracture toughness · Uniaxial compressive strength · Brazilian tensile strength

Abstract

Fracture toughness is an important phenomenon to reveal the actual strength of fractured rock materials. It is, therefore, crucial to use the fracture toughness models principally for simulating the performance of fractured rock medium. In this study, the mode-I fracture toughness (KIC) was investigated using several soft computing techniques. For this purpose, an extensive literature survey was carried out to obtain a comprehensive database that includes simple and widely used mechanical rock parameters such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS). Several soft computing techniques such as artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), gene expression programming (GEP), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) were attempted to reveal the availability of these methods to estimate the KIC. Among these techniques, it was determined that ANN presents the best prediction capability. The correlation of determination value (R2) for the proposed ANN model is 0.90, showing its relative success. In this manner, the present study can be declared a case study, indicating the applicability of several soft computing techniques for the evaluation of KIC. However, the number of samples for different rock types should be increased to improve the established predictive models in future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKEN, E., KOCA, T. K. (2023). A comparative study to estimate the mode I fracture toughness of rocks using several soft computing techniques. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 296–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/950909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Dai, F., Wei, M. D., Xu, N. W., Zhao, T., Xu, Y. (2015). Numerical investigation of the progressive fracture mechanisms of four ISRM-suggested specimens for determining the mode I fracture toughness of rocks. Computers and Geotechnics, 69, 424-441.
  2. Anderson, T. L. (2017). Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. Fourth edition, CRC Press, 680 pp, ISBN: 978-1-4987-2813-3.
  3. Al-Shayea, N. A., Khan, K., & Abduljauwad, S. N. (2000). Effects of confining pressure and temperature on mixed-mode (I–II) fracture toughness of a limestone rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37(4), 629-643.
  4. Dwivedi, R. D., Soni, A. K., Goel, R. K., & Dube, A. K. (2000). Fracture toughness of rocks under sub-zero temperature conditions. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37(8), 1267-1275.
  5. Chang, S. H., Lee, C. I., & Jeon, S. (2002). Measurement of rock fracture toughness under modes I and II and mixed-mode conditions by using disc-type specimens. Engineering Geology, 66(1-2), 79-97.
  6. Alber, M., & Brardt, A. (2003). Factors influencing fracture toughness KIC from simple screening tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 5(40), 779-784.
  7. Al-Shayea, N. A. (2005). Crack propagation trajectories for rocks under mixed mode I–II fracture. Engineering Geology, 81(1), 84-97.
  8. Nasseri, M. H. B., Mohanty, B., & Robin, P. Y. (2005). Characterization of microstructures and fracture toughness in five granitic rocks. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences, 3(42), 450-460.
  9. Mahanta, B., Singh, T. N., & Ranjith, P. G. (2016). Influence of thermal treatment on mode I fracture toughness of certain Indian rocks. Engineering Geology, 210, 103-114.
  10. Brevik, N. Ø. (2016). Experimental study of fracture toughness in sedimentary rocks, Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics, 144. Pakdaman, A. M., Moosavi, M., & Mohammadi, S. (2019). Experimental and numerical investigation into the methods of determination of mode I static fracture toughness of rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 100, 154-170.
  11. Ge, Z., Sun, Q., Xue, L., & Yang, T. (2021). The influence of microwave treatment on the mode I fracture toughness of granite. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 249, 107768. Kuruppu, M. D. (1997). Fracture toughness measurement using chevron notched semi-circular bend specimen. International journal of fracture, 86(4),