Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2

SUGGESTING CONVERSION FACTOR COEFFICIENTS for ESTIMATING DIFFERENT TYPES of SCHMIDT HAMMER REBOUND HARDNESS VALUES

KAYALARIN FARKLI TİP SCHMİDT ÇEKİCİ GERİ TEPME SERTLİK DEĞERLERİNİN TAHMİNİ İÇİN DÖNÜŞÜM KATSAYISI ÖNERİLMESİ

Pages
719–728
Publication Date
2023-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Coefficients have been proposed for the conversion of N-type and L-type Schmidt hammer rebound hardness to each other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mechanical properties of rocks such as uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, shear strength are the properties that determine their behavior under load.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These properties of rocks are often determined by difficult, complex, time-consuming and expensive test methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Coefficients have been proposed for the conversion of N-type and L-type Schmidt hammer rebound hardness to each other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Schmidt Çekici Geri Tepme Sertliği · Dönüşüm Katsayısı · Kaya

Abstract

Mechanical properties of rocks such as uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength, shear strength are the properties that determine their behavior under load. These properties of rocks are often determined by difficult, complex, time-consuming and expensive test methods. Therefore, instead of determining these properties directly, these properties can be estimated indirectly by using relatively inexpensive, fast and easily applicable methods. The surface hardness parameter of Schmidt hammer rebound hardness is fast, inexpensive, and easy to apply to determine the hardness of rocks and concrete. It is also used to indirectly determine the mechanical properties of rocks. It is seen that two different types of hammers (N-type and L-type) with different impact energies are commonly used in the literature. In this study the correlations between the surface hardness of different rocks obtained using N-type and L-type Schmidt hammers were analyzed. For this purpose, data were compiled from studies in the literature, which included both N-type and L-type Schmidt hammer rebound hardness of different rock types, and the collected data were analyzed statistically. Coefficients have been proposed for the conversion of N-type and L-type Schmidt hammer rebound hardness to each other.

Özet

Kayaların tek eksenli basınç dayanımı, çekme dayanımı, makaslama dayanımı gibi mekanik özellikleri yük altındaki davranışlarını belirleyen özellikleridir. Kayaların bu özelliklerini çoğu zaman zor, karmaşık, zaman alıcı, pahalı deney yöntemleri ile belirlenmektedir. Bu yüzden bu özellikleri doğrudan belirlemek yerine nispeten ucuz, hızlı ve kolay uygulanabilir yöntemlerle belirlenen kaya özellikleri ile bu özellikler dolaylı olarak tahmin edilebilir. Schmidt çekici geri sıçrama sertliği de kayaların ve betonun yüzey sertliğini tespit etmek için kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Schmidt çekici testi hızlı, görece ucuz ve kolay uygulanabilirdir. Aynı zamanda kayaların mekanik özelliklerinin dolaylı olarak belirlenmesinde kullanılır. Yöntemin hem arazide hem laboratuvarda uygulanabiliyor olması yöntemin diğer avantajlı yönüdür. Literatürde yaygın olarak kullanılan farklı darbe enerjilerine sahip iki farklı çekiç tipinin (N-tipi ve L-tipi) kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında N-tipi ve L-tipi Schmidt çekici kullanılarak elde edilmiş sertlik değerlerinin birbiri ile arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Bunun için literatürde farklı kaya türlerine ait hem N-tipi hem de L-tipi Schmidt çekici geri sıçrama sertliklerinin yer aldığı çalışmalardan veriler derlenmiş, derlenen veriler istatistiksel olarak incelenmiştir. N-tipi ve L-tipi Schmidt çekici geri sıçrama sertliklerinin birbirine dönüşümü için katsayılar önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBAY, D., EKİNCİOĞLU, G. (2023). SUGGESTING CONVERSION FACTOR COEFFICIENTS for ESTIMATING DIFFERENT TYPES of SCHMIDT HAMMER REBOUND HARDNESS VALUES. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 719–728. https://ajindex.com/articles/950366

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbay, D., Altındağ, R., 2020. Reliability and evaluation of point load index values obtained from different testing devices. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 120, 181–90.
  2. Aladejare, A.E., 2020. Evaluation of empirical estimation of uniaxial compressive strength of rock using measurements from index and physical tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,12, 256–68.
  3. Asteris, P.G., Mamou, A., Hajihassani, M., Hasanipanah, M., Koopialipoor, M., Le, T.T., Kardanig, N., Armaghanih, D.J., 2021. Soft computing based closed form equations correlating L and L-type Schmidt hammer rebound numbers of rocks. Transportation Geotechnics, 29, 100588. Ayday, C., Goktan, R.M., 1992. Correlations between L and L-type Schmidt hammer reboumd values obtained during field testing. ISRM Symposium: Eurock'92 - Rock Characterization, 14-17 September 1992,
  4. Chester, U.K., J.A.Hudson (ed.), British Geotechnical Society, London, 47-50.
  5. Aydin, A., Basu, A., 2005. The Schmidt hammer in rock material characterization. Engineering Geology, 81, 1–14.
  6. Aydin, A., 2009. ISRM Suggested method for determination of the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness: Revised version*. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46, 627–34.
  7. Bruno, G., Vessia, G., Bobbo, L., 2013. Statistical method for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rock by schmidt hammer tests performed on core samples. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 46, 199–206.
  8. Buyuksagis, I.S., Goktan, R.M., 2007. The effect of Schmidt hammer type on uniaxial compressive strength prediction of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44, 299–307.
  9. Capik, M., Yılmaz, A.O., 2017. Modeling of Micro Deval abrasion loss based on some rock properties. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 134, 549–556.
  10. Çelik, S.B., Çobanoğlu, İ., 2019.
  11. Comparative investigation of Shore, Schmidt, and Leeb hardness tests in the characterization of rock materials. Environmental Earth Sciences, 9, 78. Çobanoǧlu, İ., Çelik, S.B., 2008. Estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from point load strength, Schmidt hardness and P-wave velocity. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 67, 491–498.
  12. Deere, D.U., Miller, R.P., 1966. Engineering classifications and index properties of intact rock. Technical Report No. AFNL-TR-65-116,
  13. Air Force Weapon Laboratory, New Mexico. Demirdag, S., Sengun, N., Ugur, I., Altindag, R., 2018. Estimating the uniaxial comp