Journals / Marine Science and Technology Bulletin / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Site Analysis of Maritime Transportation Infrastructures by Using the Coastal Vulnerability Index Approach: The Case of Bodrum Peninsula

Pages
142–155
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the determined results, it was founded that, Ortakent and Turgutreis were Very High (red-5); Yalıkavak, Milta and Kale MTIs are High (orange-4); Cruise Port, Gumbet and Bitez were found to have Moderate (yellow-3) CVI values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, site locations of marina-type maritime transportation infrastructure (MTI) in the Bodrum Peninsula were analyzed using the coastal vulnerability index (CVI) approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CVI results have been presented as maps and tabular values using a scale of 1 (Very Low) to 5 (Very High).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the determined results, it was founded that, Ortakent and Turgutreis were Very High (red-5); Yalıkavak, Milta and Kale MTIs are High (orange-4); Cruise Port, Gumbet and Bitez were found to have Moderate (yellow-3) CVI values.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bodrum Peninsula · Maritime infrastructure · CVI

Abstract

In this research, site locations of marina-type maritime transportation infrastructure (MTI) in the Bodrum Peninsula were analyzed using the coastal vulnerability index (CVI) approach. For the calculation of CVI, six parameters; coastal slope, relief, relative sea level change, shoreline erosion/accretion, mean tide range, and mean wave height were used in accordance with the method. After the data collected from different data sources were transferred into a geo-database, basic geographical information systems analyses were applied (reclass, buffer, subset, slope, overlay, classify, count, map algebra, etc.). CVI results have been presented as maps and tabular values using a scale of 1 (Very Low) to 5 (Very High). Thus, the vulnerability level of the MTI site locations was determined. According to the determined results, it was founded that, Ortakent and Turgutreis were Very High (red-5); Yalıkavak, Milta and Kale MTIs are High (orange-4); Cruise Port, Gumbet and Bitez were found to have Moderate (yellow-3) CVI values. In this research, the CVI approach was applied by evaluating the physical site location characteristics of marina-type MTI, for the first time applied in the Bodrum Peninsula, where there is a high density of marina. For adaptation strategies for existing MTIs, more investigations should be realized from the functional, economic, social, and ecosystem points of view. From the managerial point of view, it can be said that small marinas or municipal berthing facilities with a state ownership model are advised to work together with other marinas in the region if they exist. The CVI-methodology should also utilize for the site selection of any type of maritime transportation infrastructure.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULELİ, T., BAYAZIT, Ş. (2023). Site Analysis of Maritime Transportation Infrastructures by Using the Coastal Vulnerability Index Approach: The Case of Bodrum Peninsula. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 142–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/950243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aerts, J., Botzen, W. J., Eamanuel, K., Lin, N., de Moel, H., & Michael-Kerjan, E. (2014). Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science, 344(6183), 473–476. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248222
  2. Becker, A., Fischer, M., & Matson, P. (2010). Impacts of climate change of seaports: A survey of knowledge, perceptions, and planning efforts among port administrators. Shifting Shorelines: Adapting to the Future, The 22nd International Conference of The Coastal Society. North Carolina, USA. Retrieved on November 29, 2022 from http://nsgl.gso.uri.edu/coastalsociety/TCS22/papers/Becker_papers.pdf
  3. Becker, A., Inoue, S., Fischer, M., & Schwegler, B. (2012). Climate change impacts on international seaports: knowledge, perceptions, and planning efforts among port administrators. Climate Change, 110, (5–29), 1480–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0043-7
  4. Becker, A., Chase, N. T. L., Fischer, M., Schwegler, B., & Mosher, K. (2016). A method to estimate climate-critical construction materials applied to seaport protection. Global Environmental Change, 40(2016), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.008
  5. Caldwell, P. C., Merrfield M. A., & Thompson, P. R. (2015). Sea level measured by tide gauges from global oceans - the Joint Archive for Sea Level holdings (NCEI Accession 0019568), Version 5.5, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.7289/v5v40s7w
  6. Campbell, J., & Shin, M. (2011). Essentials of Geographic Information Systems. Saylor Foundation. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/67
  7. Cheong, S. M. (2011). Policy solutions in the U.S. Climatic Change, 106, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9996-1
  8. Christodoulou, A., Christidis, P., & Demirel, H. (2019). Sea‑level rise in ports: A wider focus on impacts. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 21, 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-018-0114-z CMS (Copernicus Marine Service). (2021). Copernicus marine in situ TAC data management team (2021). Copernicus Marine in situ TAC - physical parameters list. Retrieved on November 29 2022, from https://doi.org/10.13155/53381 CMS (Copernicus Marine Service) (2022). Global Ocean Waves Reanalysis WAVERYS. Retrieved on November 29, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00022
  9. Cogswell, A., Greenan, B. J. W., & Greyson, P. (2018). Evaluation of two common vulnerability index calculation methods. Ocean & Coastal Management, 160, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.041
  10. Cooper, J.