Journals / Kastamonu İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Sayı: 10

Hegemonic Masculinity and Media: A Bibliometric Analysis

Hegemonik Erkeklik ve Medya: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Pages
49–67
Publication Date
2023-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, when looking at the common keyword analysis used in the studies, the concepts of digital violence and international advertising were used at least in hegemonic masculinity and media studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hegemonic masculinity, in general, refers to the maintenance of unequal gender relations in society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the establishment of the intellectual foundations of the concept of hegemonic masculinity, studies have begun to examine the relationship between hegemonic masculinity and the media since 1991.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, when looking at the common keyword analysis used in the studies, the concepts of digital violence and international advertising were used at least in hegemonic masculinity and media studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hegemonya · hegemonik erkeklik · medya

Abstract

Hegemonic masculinity, in general, refers to the maintenance of unequal gender relations in society. The relationship of hegemonic masculinity, especially with media tools, helps to gain legitimacy in society and to adopt ideas through both structural and produced products. With the establishment of the intellectual foundations of the concept of hegemonic masculinity, studies have begun to examine the relationship between hegemonic masculinity and the media since 1991. In this study, it is aimed to examine the research articles on "hegemonic masculinity and the media" and published in the leading journals of the field by bibliometric method. In the study, 339 research articles in the Web of Science database were examined. The bibliometric data of the examined studies were visualized through the VOSviewer program, as well as the network maps. As a result of the study, it has been determined that the country with the highest number of publications in this field is the USA, and the university with the highest number of publications is the University of the Witwatersrand. While the researcher who examined the relationship between hegemonic masculinity and the media the most (n=5) was Edward M. Kian, it was determined that the journal that published the most (n=30) articles in this field was Men and Masculinities. On the other hand, when looking at the common keyword analysis used in the studies, the concepts of digital violence and international advertising were used at least in hegemonic masculinity and media studies.

Özet

Hegemonik erkeklik, toplum içerisinde genel bir ifadeyle eşit olmayan cinsiyet ilişkilerinin sürdürülmesini ifade etmektedir. Hegemonik erkekliğin özellikle medya araçları ile olan ilişkisi hem yapısal hem de üretilen ürünler aracılığıyla toplum içerisinde meşruiyet kazanmasına ve fikirlerin benimsetilmesine yardımcı olmaktadır. Hegemonik erkeklik kavramının düşünsel temellerinin atılmasıyla birlikte 1991 yılından itibaren hegemonik erkeklik ve medya arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen çalışmalar yapılmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışma da “hegemonik erkeklik ve medya” ile ilgili yapılmış ve alanın önde gelen dergilerinde yayımlanmış araştırma makalelerinin bibliyometrik yöntemle incelenmesi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada Web of Science veri tabanında yer alan 339 araştırma makalesi incelenmiştir. İncelenen çalışmaların bibliyometrik verileri VOSviewer programı aracılığıyla ağ haritaları görselleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, bu alanda en fazla yayına sahip ülkenin ABD olduğu, en fazla yayına sahip üniversitenin ise Witwatersrand Üniversitesi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Hegemonik erkeklik ve medya arasındaki ilişkiyi en fazla (n=5) inceleyen araştırmacı Edward M. Kian olurken, bu alanda en fazla (n=30) makale yayımlayan derginin ise Men and Masculinities olduğu belirlenmiştir. Diğer taraftan çalışmalarda kullanılan ortak anahtar kelime analizine bakıldığında, hegemonik erkeklik ve medya çalışmalarında en az dijital şiddet ve uluslararası reklamcılık kavramları kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, Y., ÖZTÜRK, M. (2023). Hegemonic Masculinity and Media: A Bibliometric Analysis. Kastamonu İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 10, 49–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/950165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Althusser, L. (2019). İdeoloji ve Devletin İdeolojik Aygıtları. (A. Tümertekin, Çev.) İstanbul:
  2. İthaki Yayınları.
  3. Anderson, E., & Kian, E. M. (2012). Examining media contestation of masculinity and head trauma in the national football league. Men and Masculinities, 15(2), 152-173.
  4. Ayhan, B., & Demir, Y. (2022). Systematic sexism: Women’s sports news in a circle of gatekeepers and users on Twitter. Communication & Sport, 1-23. doi:10.1177/21674795221147644 Barry, B., & Martin, D. (2016). Fashionably fit: Young men’s dress decisions and appearance anxieties. Textile, 14(3), 326–347.
  5. Beasley, C. (2008). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 86-103.
  6. Bulut, E., & Winter, Z. S. (2022). Contested masculinities and political imaginations in “New Turkey” and Çukur as authoritarian spaces of protection. New Perspectives on Turkey, 1-22. doi:10.1017/npt.2022.24. Burstyn, V. (1999). The Rites of Men: Manhood, Politics, and the Culture of Sport. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  7. Carrigan, T., Connell, B., & Lee, J. (2015). Toward a New Sociology of Masculinity. H. Brod (Ed.), The Making of Masculinities: The New Men's Studies (s. 63-100) içinde. New York: Routledge. Chavarro, D., Ràfols, I., & Tang, P. (2018). To what extent is inclusion in the web of science an indicator of journal ‘Quality’? Research Evaluation, 27(2), 106-118.
  8. Cheng, C. (1999). Marginalized masculinities and hegemonic masculinity: An introduction. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7(3), 295-315.
  9. Chess, S., & Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about #GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(1), 208-220.
  10. Collier, R. (1998). Masculinities: Crime and Criminology. London: Sage. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Sydney: Allen and Unwin. Connell, R. W. (1993). The big picture: masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society, 22(5), 597-623.
  11. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. Connell, R. W. (2000). The Men and The Boys. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Connell, R. W. (2001). Understanding men: Gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities. Social Thought & Research, 24(1/2), 13–31.
  14. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859.
  15. Cuklanz, L., & Erol, A. (2021). The shifting image of hegemonic masculinity in contemporary television