Journals / Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

The Effect of Interactive Videos on Volleyball Education

Pages
267–275
Publication Date
2023-07-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Interactive videos positively affect volleyball knowledge, so their use in educational environments should be encouraged.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to examine the effect of interactive videos on volleyball education, and the effects of gender and grade level on volleyball knowledge level were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 105 (43 boys and 62 girls) fifth and sixth-grade students participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Interactive videos positively affect volleyball knowledge, so their use in educational environments should be encouraged.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ADDIE model · instructional technologies · media in education

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of interactive videos on volleyball education, and the effects of gender and grade level on volleyball knowledge level were evaluated. A total of 105 (43 boys and 62 girls) fifth and sixth-grade students participated in the study. Participants were divided into three groups: Interactive Video Group (IVG), Video Group (VG), and Control Group (CG). The volleyball education program consisting of seven videos for two weeks was applied to the experimental groups. Interactive videos include single or multiple-choice questions, true-false statements, and drag and drop activities. ADDIE Model was used in instructional design. Gender has no effect on volleyball knowledge level (p>.05), but grade level has an effect in favor of sixth graders (p<05). In terms of volleyball knowledge level, there is a difference between the pretest and posttest of IVG and VG (p<.05) but not in CG (p>.05). There is a difference in favor of IVG and VG, respectively, in posttest results (p<.05), but not in pretest results (p>.05). Interactive videos positively affect volleyball knowledge, so their use in educational environments should be encouraged.

🔖

Cite This Article

TABAN, Z., İMAMOĞLU, M. (2023). The Effect of Interactive Videos on Volleyball Education. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 267–275. https://ajindex.com/articles/950052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Antoniou, P., Derri, V., Kioumourtzoglou, E. & Mouroutsos, S. (2003). Applying multimedia computer‐assisted instruction to enhance physical education students’ knowledge of basketball rules, European Journal of Physical Education, 8(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898030080106
  2. Antoniou, P., Moulelis, E., Siskos, A. & Tsamourtzis, E. (2006). Multimedia: an instructional tool in the teaching process of alpine ski. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, 941-945.
  3. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
  4. Cherrett, T., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Making training more cognitively effective: Making videos interactive. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1124–1134.
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  6. Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compe du.2014.06.018 Dror, I. E. (2008). Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1075/p&c.16.2.02dro
  7. Franzoni, A. L., Ceballos, C. P., & Rubio, E. (2013, July 15-18). Interactive video enhanced learning-teaching process for digital native students. 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Beijing, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2013.84
  8. Giannakos, M. N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of video analytics: Lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V16I1.1976
  9. Giannakos, M. N., Jaccheri, L., & Krogstie, J. (2016). Exploring the relationship between video lecture usage patterns and students’ attitudes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1259–1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12313
  10. Gil-Arias, A., García-González, L., Del Villar, F., Moreno, A., & Moreno, M. P. (2015). Effectiveness of video feedback and interactive questioning in improving tactical knowledge in volleyball. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(3), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.2466/30.PMS.121c23x9
  11. Guo, P. J., Kim,