SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences / 2023 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

The transformation from e-government to e-land administration in Türkiye: A SWOT-based assessment analysis

Derya Nur Bolat PAK
Osman Sami KIRTILOĞLU
Mert KAYALIK
Zeynel Abidin POLAT
Pages
290–300
Publication Date
2023-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, various suggestions were made for the institutional policies that should be implemented in the transition to e-land administration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The advantage of the developing information and communication technology in terms of both time and cost in service delivery has accelerated the use of these technologies in public administration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Land Registry and Cadastre Directorate and many other public institutions have started to provide many services through e-government within the scope of land management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, various suggestions were made for the institutional policies that should be implemented in the transition to e-land administration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:e-government · e-land administration · public manegement

Abstract

The advantage of the developing information and communication technology in terms of both time and cost in service delivery has accelerated the use of these technologies in public administration. With this change, the concept of e-government has taken its place in the literature and has begun to be used in different fields (such as health, safety, tax, education) in many countries. Land management is one of these areas. The Land Registry and Cadastre Directorate and many other public institutions have started to provide many services through e-government within the scope of land management. Thus, the foundations of the transition to e-land administration began to be laid. This study aims to determine the necessary strategies for transition to e-land administration considering the role of the e-government platform in the provision of public services relating to land management in Turkey. Therefore, the current e-service structure related pertaining to land management has been analyzed with the SWOT technique. Thus, the strengths and weaknesses of the existing structure system were revealed. Besides, the opportunities and threats faced by this structure were identified. As a result of the analysis, various suggestions were made for the institutional policies that should be implemented in the transition to e-land administration.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAK, D. N. B., KIRTILOĞLU, O. S., KAYALIK, M., POLAT, Z. A. (2023). The transformation from e-government to e-land administration in Türkiye: A SWOT-based assessment analysis. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 290–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/949745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Şahin, A., & Örselli, E. (2003). E-Devlet anlayışı sürecinde Türkiye. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (9), 343-356.
  2. Öğüt, A. (2003). Bilgi Çağında Yönetim. Nobel Basımevi, Ankara.
  3. İşcan, F., & Ilgaz, A. (2017). Analysis of geographic/urban information system web presentations of local governments in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(3), 75-83.
  4. Ercan, O., & Toker, K. (2022). Assessment of the completion of the forest cadastre considering the legal grounds, collaboration, and the use of technology: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(1), 49-58.
  5. Roy, J. (2006). E-Governmnet in Canada: Transformation İfor Digital Age. Ottawa University: Ottawa Press.
  6. İşcan, F., & Vargeloğlu, F. (2019). Boru hattı kamulaştırma çalışmalarında karşılaşılan teknik, ekonomik, hukuki sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Geomatik, 4(3), 239-253.
  7. Yıldırır, H., & Karakurt, E. (2004). e-Devlet ve Uygulamaları. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 6(1). Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e‐government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality?. Public administration review, 62(4), 424-433.
  8. Başar, M. S., & Bölükbaş, A. (2010). Gelişmişlik göstergeleri ve e-devlet indeksi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 157-170.
  9. Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F., & Pernul, G. (2003). Security requirements for e-government services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer communications, 26(16), 1873-1883.
  10. Van der Molen, P., & Wubbe, M. (2007, November). E-government and E-Land Administration-As an example: The Netherlands. In 6th FIG Regional Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica (pp. 12-15).
  11. Marquardt, K., & Orhan, G. (2005). E-Devlet: Gerçek ya da Hayal içinde: E-Devlet: Kavramın Anlamı ve Kapsamı, (Editörler: Karl Marquardt ve Orhan Gökçe), Çizgi Kitapevi Yayınları, Konya, 1-25.
  12. Uğur, A. A., & Çütcü, İ. (2009). E-Devlet ve tasarruf etkisi kapsamında VEDOP Projesi. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 1-20.
  13. Uçkan, Ö. (2003). E-devlet, e-demokrasi ve e-yönetişim modeli: Bir ilkesel öncelik olarak bilgiye erişim özgürlüğü. Aylık Strateji ve Analiz E-Dergisi, 5(5), 1-19.
  14. Zakout, W., Wehrmann, B., & Törhönen, M., P. (2006). Good governance in land administration, The World Bank, FAO, Washington DC. Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open Univers