Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Performance Optimization of Auxetic Structures on Energy Absorption of Cylindrical Sandwich Using Taguchi and ANOVA Methods

Pages
445–454
Publication Date
2023-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the lattice geometry was the most effective parameter on the specific energy absorption of cylindrical sandwiches, with an effect rate of 61.62%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:High engineering requirements of shock absorbers have increased interest in auxetic materials, which have higher specific energy absorption performance compared to conventional solid absorbers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Last decade, many optimization studies were conducted to improve the energy absorption performance of auxetic tubular structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the lattice geometry was the most effective parameter on the specific energy absorption of cylindrical sandwiches, with an effect rate of 61.62%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Auxetic · Energy Absorption · Taguchi

Abstract

High engineering requirements of shock absorbers have increased interest in auxetic materials, which have higher specific energy absorption performance compared to conventional solid absorbers. Last decade, many optimization studies were conducted to improve the energy absorption performance of auxetic tubular structures. Most studies focused on adding inner and outer shells to thin-walled auxetic tubular absorbers with different types of lattice structures to enhance energy absorption of the cylindrical sandwiches. There are limited studies on thicker-walled auxetic tubes and their related shell thicknesses to optimize performance. In this study, the thickness of the thicker-walled auxetic core thickness (1.2 mm, 1.6 mm, 2 mm), shell thickness (16 mm, 20 mm, 24 mm), and auxetic lattice structure (Re-Entrant Circular, SiliComb, and ArrowHead) were optimized to improve the specific energy absorption of cylindrical sandwiches. The Taguchi method was used to determine the optimum parameters for cylindrical sandwiches. In addition, the effect ratio of the parameters on the specific energy absorption was investigated using the ANOVA method. The energy absorption properties of the cylindrical sandwiches were determined using the drop-weight test. The highest specific energy absorption was obtained using a shell thickness of 1.2 mm and a core thickness of 16 mm using an SiliComb lattice. It was determined that the lattice geometry was the most effective parameter on the specific energy absorption of cylindrical sandwiches, with an effect rate of 61.62%.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, O., BADEMLİOĞLU, A. H., KABOĞLU, C. (2023). Performance Optimization of Auxetic Structures on Energy Absorption of Cylindrical Sandwich Using Taguchi and ANOVA Methods. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 445–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/948752

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. K. E. Evans and A. Alderson, “Auxetic materials: Functional materials and structures from lateral thinking!,” Advanced Materials, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 617–628, 2000, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9 3.0.CO;2-3
  2. G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, and T. Rouxel, “Poisson’s ratio and modern materials,” Nat Mater, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 823–837, 2011, doi: 10.1038/nmat3134
  3. J. Zhang, G. Lu, and Z. You, “Large deformation and energy absorption of additively manufactured auxetic materials and structures: A review,” Compos B Eng, vol. 201, no. 108340, pp. 1–36, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108340
  4. A. Alomarah, S. H. Masood, and D. Ruan, “Out-of-plane and in-plane compression of additively manufactured auxetic structures,” Aerosp Sci Technol, vol. 106, pp. 106–107, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106107
  5. C. Luo, C. Z. Han, X. Y. Zhang, X. G. Zhang, X. Ren, and Y. M. Xie, “Design, manufacturing and applications of auxetic tubular structures: A review,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 163, no. December 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107682
  6. Q. Gao, L. Wang, Z. Zhou, Z. D. Ma, C. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Theoretical, numerical and experimental analysis of three-dimensional double-V honeycomb,” Mater Des, vol. 139, pp. 380–391, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.024
  7. W. Lee et al., “Effect of auxetic structures on crash behavior of cylindrical tube,” Compos Struct, vol. 208, no. April 2018, pp. 836–846, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.068
  8. Y. Guo et al., “Deformation behaviors and energy absorption of auxetic lattice cylindrical structures under axial crushing load,” Aerosp Sci Technol, vol. 98, p. 105662, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105662
  9. F. Usta, O. F. Ertaş, A. Ataalp, H. S. Türkmen, Z. Kazancı, and F. Scarpa, “Impact behavior of triggered and non-triggered crash tubes with auxetic lattices,” Multiscale and Multidisciplinary Modeling, Experiments and Design, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 119–127, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41939-018-00040-z
  10. H. Sun, C. Ge, Q. Gao, N. Qiu, and L. Wang, “Crashworthiness of sandwich cylinder filled with double-arrowed auxetic structures under axial impact loading,” International Journal of Crashworthiness, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2021.1947071
  11. X. Y. Zhang et al., “A novel type of tubular structure with auxeticity both in radial direction and wall thickness,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 163, no. March, p. 107758, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107758
  12. L. Chen et