SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Co(II) Adsorption onto Ferrous Chloride and Thermally Modified Diatomite: Surface Properties and Adsorption Mechanism

Eda GÖKIRMAK SÖĞÜT
Metin ÇELEBİ
Pages
307–319
Publication Date
2023-06-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the selected modification methods were effective in removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions, making the samples potentially cost-effective adsorbents to remove the water pollution problem

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a potential alternative for heavy metal removal, adsorption using various low-cost materials is one of the most effective methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The adsorption equilibrium was well described by the Langmuir isotherm model, with the maximum adsorption capacities of DA, DM, DM-550°C and DM-850°C at about 18.18 mg L-1, 28.65 mg L-1, 48.30 mg L-1, and 66.22 mg L-1, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the selected modification methods were effective in removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions, making the samples potentially cost-effective adsorbents to remove the water pollution problem
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adsorption · Co (II) · Ferrous chloride

Abstract

As a potential alternative for heavy metal removal, adsorption using various low-cost materials is one of the most effective methods. This study presents the efficiency of local diatomite modified by ferrous chloride and heat treatment in removing Co(II) from an aqueous solution. The samples were characterized by ICP, XRD, TG-DTA, FTIR, SEM, and BET analyses and the adsorption efficiency of the samples for Co(II) ions was investigated under different factors such as contact time and pH. The adsorption equilibrium was well described by the Langmuir isotherm model, with the maximum adsorption capacities of DA, DM, DM-550°C and DM-850°C at about 18.18 mg L-1, 28.65 mg L-1, 48.30 mg L-1, and 66.22 mg L-1, respectively. The kinetic data were best fitted to the pseudo-second-order model. In addition, ion exchange and electrostatic surface complexation were predicted to play dominant roles in the adsorption mechanism. The results showed that the selected modification methods were effective in removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions, making the samples potentially cost-effective adsorbents to remove the water pollution problem

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖĞÜT, E. G., ÇELEBİ, M. (2023). Co(II) Adsorption onto Ferrous Chloride and Thermally Modified Diatomite: Surface Properties and Adsorption Mechanism. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 307–319. https://ajindex.com/articles/948736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. M. Ferri, S. Campisi, and A. Gervasini, “Nickel and cobalt adsorption on hydroxyapatite: a study for the de-metalation of electronic industrial wastewaters,” Adsorption, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 649–660, Mar. 2019
  2. L. P. Lingamdinne, J. R. Koduru, H. Roh, Y. L. Choi, Y. Y. Chang, and J. K. Yang, “Adsorption removal of Co(II) from waste-water using graphene oxide,” Hydrometallurgy, vol. 165, pp. 90–96, Oct. 2016
  3. Y. V. Hete, S. B. Gholase, and R. U. Khope, “Adsorption Study of Cobalt on Treated Granular Activated Carbon” E-Journal Chem., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 335–339, 2012
  4. Y. Aşçi and Ş. Kaya, “Removal of cobalt ions from water by ion-exchange method” New pub Balaban, vol. 52, no. 1–3, pp. 267–273, 2014
  5. F. L. Becker, D. Rodríguez, and M. Schwab, “Magnetic Removal of Cobalt from Waste Water by Ferrite Co-precipitation,” Procedia Mater. Sci., vol. 1, pp. 644–650, Jan. 2012
  6. B. S. Thaçi and S. T. Gashi, “Reverse Osmosis Removal of Heavy Metalsfrom Wastewater Effluents Using BiowasteMaterials Pretreatment,” Polish J. Environ. Stud., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 337–341, Nov. 2018
  7. N. Tzanetakis, W. M. Taama, K. Scott, R. J. J. Jachuck, R. S. Slade, and J. Varcoe, “Comparative performance of ion exchange membranes for electrodialysis of nickel and cobalt,” Sep. Purif. Technol, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 113–127, Feb. 2003
  8. Ö. Yavuz, Y. Altunkaynak, and F. Güzel, “Removal of copper, nickel, cobalt and manganese from aqueous solution by kaolinite,” Water Res., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 948–952, Feb. 2003
  9. N. Abdullah, N. Yusof, W. J. Lau, J. Jaafar, and A. F. Ismail, “Recent trends of heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by membrane technologies,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 76, pp. 17–38, Aug. 2019
  10. S. A. Mirbagheri and S. N. Hosseini, “Pilot plant investigation on petrochemical wastewater treatmentfor the removal of copper and chromium with the objective of reuse,” Desalination, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 85–93, Jan. 2005
  11. Y. Huang, X. Zeng, L. Guo, J. Lan, L. Zhang, and D. Cao, “Heavy metal ion removal of wastewater by zeolite-imidazolate frameworks,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 194, pp. 462–469, Apr. 2018
  12. M. Çelebi and E. Gökirmak Söğüt, “High-efficiency removal of cationic dye and heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using amino-functionalized graphene oxide, adsorption isotherms, kinetics studies, and mechanism,” Turkish J. Chem., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1577–1593, Jan. 2022
  13. H. Peng and J. Guo, “Removal of chromium from wastewater by m